Gayatri Infra Planners Pvt. Ltd vs Mr. Amit Joshi & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 495 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, in closing a corporate debtor's right to file a reply, must give reasons for refusing an application to file the reply out of time; where the record shows no valid reasons for rejecting such an application, a last opportunity to file the reply, on payment of costs, should be afforded rather than the right being extinguished outright.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Gayatri Infra Planners Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus Amit Joshi & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vineet Kumar, Advocates For Respondent: Ms. Pooja M Saigal, Simrat Singh Pasay, Chaitanya Pandey, Advocates for R-1 to R-5.
ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
04.05.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant and Learned
Counsel for the Respondent.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 11th April, 2022 passed
by the Adjudicating Authority in I.A. No. 1074 of 2022. This I.A. was filed on
behalf of the Corporate Debtor stating that certain documents in the Petition are
not legible and they could not file Reply. The Adjudicating Authority held that
the Corporate Debtor is unduly prolonging the proceeding by taking unnecessary
adjournments hence the Application was rejected and 'right to file Reply' was
closed.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that even if the Application i.e.
I.A. No. 1074 of 2022 was rejected, the Adjudicating Authority ought to have 2
given liberty to file Reply by imposing certain cost on the Corporate Debtor but
'right to file Reply' ought not to have been closed.
4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the Appellant has not
annexed all relevant orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority which indicate
that Corporate Debtor has been taking unnecessary adjournments hence the
Adjudicating Authority has rightly exercising jurisdiction closed the 'right to file
Reply'.
5. After having heard Learned Counsel for the parties and perusing the
record, we are satisfied that no valid reasons have been given by the Adjudicating
Authority for rejecting the I.A. No. 1074 of 2022 hence we do not find any ground
to interfere in the Order rejecting I.A. No. 1074 of 2022 however we are of the
view that as a last opportunity a short time ought to have been given to the
Corporate Debtor to file Reply. We thus are of the view that one-week further
time be allowed to the Corporate Debtor/Appellant to file its Reply-Affidavit
before the Adjudicating Authority subject to payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/-
which be paid to the Respondent alongwith filing of the Reply-Affidavit.
With the aforesaid, this Appeal is disposed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn
Company Appeal (AT) Ins. No. 495 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free