Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Gaurav Jaina vs Bank Of India & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal12 March 2020

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The pendency of a civil suit between the parties concerning the same transaction does not, by itself, furnish a ground to reject an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, where the financial creditor establishes that a debt is due and the default is not disputed.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALNEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 401 of 2020IN THE MATTER OF:Gaurav Jaina ...AppellantVersus

Bank of India & Anr. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant : Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal and Mr. Gaurav Choudhary, Advocates

ORDER

12.03.2020 'Bank of India' filed an application under Section 7 of the 'I&B

Code' pursuant to which Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law

Tribunal), Guwahati Bench by impugned order dated 12th February, 2020

initiated 'corporate insolvency resolution process' against 'M/s. Agnipa Energy

Private Limited' (Corporate Debtor).

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that there is a suit pending

inter se the parties and admission of application under Section 7 of the 'I&B

Code' would result in pre-empting the decision pending in the suit. It was further

submitted that because of the failure on the part of the Bank wrong insurance

policy was taken which resulted in the Corporate Debtor's taking advantage of

the same and because of this dispute pending, the Adjudicating Authority

admitted the application under Section 7.

It is not disputed that there is a 'debt' payable by the Corporate Debtor to

the Bank as loan having taken, the default has not been disputed and there is

ground for rejection of the application under Section 7 of the I&B Code. -2-

In the circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned

order dated 12th February, 2020. The appeal is dismissed. No costs.

[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)

[ Shreesha Merla ] Member (Technical)

/ns/gc/

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 401 of 2020

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free