Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Gateway Offshore Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Runwal Realtors Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal10 July 2023Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A financial creditor seeking to initiate insolvency under Section 7 must prove a "financial debt" as a matter of evidence; the mere fact that the corporate debtor received money from the creditor, which the debtor does not dispute, does not by itself establish a financial debt where the transaction's purpose is contested and no written document, such as a loan agreement, promissory note, or contract, shows that the money was disbursed as a loan carrying a time value of money. Where the corporate debtor's financial statements do not reflect any debt owed to the financial creditor, and the financial creditor has not produced its own balance sheet or other record showing the debt, the adjudicating authority is entitled to find that the financial creditor has failed to establish the existence of a financial debt, and an appellate court will not interfere with that finding absent error.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH,NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 871 of 2022

IN THE MATTER OF: Gateway Offshore Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Appellants

Vs.

Runwal Realtors Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent

Present: For Appellants: Mr. Lzafeer Ahmad, BF, Advocate For Respondent: Mr. Atit Soni, Advocate

ORDER

10.07.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.

This appeal has been filed against the order dated 10.06.2022 by which

Adjudicating Authority rejected section 7 application filed by the Appellant. The

Appellant has filed the application claiming that the amount was disbursed by

the Financial Creditor No. 1 and Financial Creditor No. 2 to the Corporate Debtor

and Corporate Debtor was liable to repay the loan and

that Corporate Debtor failed to repay the loan.

2. The notice was issued and thereafter reply to Section 7 application has

been filed. The Corporate Debtor filed its reply and submitted that amount was

disbursed for joint development of the land owned by the Corporate Debtor. The

Financial Creditor was liable to contribute Rs. 17 crore out of which only Rs.

4.43 crore has been paid to the Corporate Debtor. There was no loan agreement

or any communication in the form of the letter etc. for the purpose of

substantiating the claim.

3. The Adjudicating Authority after hearing the parties rejected section 7

application. The Adjudicating Authority observed that in the Financial

Statement of the Corporate Debtor for the year 2016-2017 and 2017-18, no debt

was reflected specifically to the Financial Creditor, hence the Appellant failed to

prove any financial debt.

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 871 of 2022

1

4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in event the Corporate

Debtor did not disclose the debt, the Financial Creditor cannot suffer. It is

submitted that with regard to the claim of the Corporate Debtor that it was a

joint venture amount in the financial statement, no investment was shown

towards Joint Venture.

5. We have considered the submission of the Learned Counsel for the parties

and peruse the record.

6. Adjudicating Authority has returned the findings after hearing the parties

in the paragraph 21 and 22 to the following effect: -

"21 However, the Financial Creditor has failed

to bring on record any other evidence in the form of a

loan agreement, promissory note, contract or any

document to substantiate its claim that there was a

financial debt and a default of the same. The Financial

Creditor has produced the Corporate Debtor's Annual

reports for the Financial Years 2016-2017 and 2017-

18. However, the same do not reflect any debt due

specifically to the Financial Creditor.

22. Further, the Financial Creditor has placed

reliance on its bank statements and confirmation of

accounts of the Corporate Debtor that reflect

transactions between the parties. However, in absence

of any written document indicating the purpose of the

said transactions, it cannot be assumed to have been

towards a loan as claimed by the Financial Creditor."

7. The present is a case where disbursement of the amount by the Financial

Creditor is not disputed by the Corporate Debtor but the case of the Corporate

Debtor was the said amount was disbursed towards Joint Venture and out of the

amount which was required to be paid by the Corporate Debtor of Rs. 17 crores, Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 871 of 2022

2 only Rs. 4.43 crore was given. There is no material on the record placed by the

Appellant to indicate that there was any disbursement for time value of money

so as to accept the debt as a financial debt.

8. The financial statement of the Corporate Debtor cannot be said to be

irrelevant document which has been relied. No debt is reflected in the Financial

Statement of the Corporate Debtor. The Appellant did not file their balance sheet

to indicate the debt due on the Corporate Debtor.

9. We, thus, are of the view that the Adjudicating Authority did not commit

any error in rejecting Section 7 application, there is no merit in the appeal, the

Appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

ss/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 871 of 2022

3

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free