Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Gangotri Textiles Limited & Ors. vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal25 March 2019Tarun Agarwala

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The application for condonation of delay is allowed on the ground that the appellants have shown sufficient cause: the delay is explained by the appellants being based in Coimbatore and taking time to engage counsel in Mumbai, and by the company's financial crisis, including erosion of net worth and the sale of its unit, which caused the company's functioning to come to a standstill, as supported by an additional affidavit.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

Date : 25.3.2019

Misc. Application No.402 of 2018 And Appeal No.457 of 2018

1.

Gangotri Textiles Limited 25-A, Venkatachalam Co-op. Colony, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore-641002.

2. Manoj Kumar Tiberewal 401, Belleza Apartment, 258 Alagesan Road, Saibaba Colony Post, Coimbatore-641011, Tamil Nadu

3. Anita Tibrewal 401, Belleza Apartment, 258 Alagesan Road, Saibaba Colony Post, Coimbatore - 641011, Tamil Nadu

4. Mayank Tibrewal 401, Belleza Apartment, 258 Alagesan Road, Saibaba Colony Post, Coimbatore - 641011, Tamil Nadu

5. Umang Tibrewal 401, Belleza Apartment, 258 Alagesan Road, Saibaba Colony Post, Coimbatore - 641011, Tamil Nadu ..... Appellants

Versus

National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. Exchange Plaza, C-1, Block G, Bandra Kurla Complex, Badra (E), Mumbai-400051. ..... Respondent 2

Ms. Rishika Harish, Advocate with Ms. Nirali Mehta, PCS i/b. Mindspright Legal for the Appellants.

Mr. Rashid Boatwalla, Advocate with Ms. Shreya Anuwal, Advocate i/b. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the Respondent.

CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member Justice M.T. Joshi, Judicial Member

Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala (Oral)

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Two orders

have been challenged in this appeal. There is a delay of 436 and

174 days respectively in questioning the veracity and legality of

the orders dated 5th July, 2017 and 26th March, 2018. The

grounds urged are that the appellants are based in Coimbatore

and it took them some time to engage an Advocate in Mumbai

for the purpose of filing the appeal. Further, the company was

facing a financial crisis and it took some time to arrange the

necessary funds.

2. In support of this contention an additional affidavit has also

been filed indicating that the net worth of the company eroded

during the financial year 2012-13 as a result the company became

a sick industry and eventually the unit of the company was sold

and the functioning of the company had come to a standstill.

3. In the light of the aforesaid, we find that adequate reasons

have been indicated in the application. Sufficient cause has been 3

shown and consequently the application is allowed. The delay in

filing the appeal is condoned subject to payment of cost which

we compute at Rs.50,000/-. The said amount shall be deposited

before the Registrar of this Tribunal within a period of four

weeks.

3. List for admission on 20th May, 2019.

Sd/-

Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member

Sd/-

Justice M.T. Joshi Judicial Member

25.3.2019 Prepared and compared by RHN

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free