Finassure Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 283 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The impugned order, passed ex parte without a show cause notice actually served on the appellants, cannot stand, because the appellants were given no opportunity of hearing. An attempt by the regulator to serve the show cause notice at a wrong address, which the regulator admitted, does not amount to effective service and so does not cure the denial of hearing.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision: 20.03.2023
Misc. Application No. 363 of 2023 And Appeal No. 283 of 2023
1.
Finassure Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 303-304, Gold Arcade, 3/a New Palasia, Indore, Madhya Pradesh- 452 001 (through its erstwhile director Mr. Amit Sharma)
2. Amit Sharma 401, Princess Landmark Ratlam Kothi, Indore- 452 001 ...Appellants
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400 051 ...Respondent
Mr. Kunal Katariya, Advocate with Mr. Neerav B Merchant and Mr. Nadeem M. Shama, Advocates i/b Thakordas and Madgavkar for the Appellants.
Mr. Manish Chhangani, Advocate with Ms. Samreen Fatima and Mr. Sumit Yadav, Advocates i/b The Law Point for the Respondent-SEBI.
CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member 2
Per: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The
present appeal has been filed against the order dated February
02, 2023 passed by the Whole Time Member ("WTM" for
convenience) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India
("SEBI" for convenience) debarring the appellants from
accessing the securities market and also directing them to refund
of the money collected from the investors under the Investment
Advisory Services.
2. We find that the impugned order was passed ex-parte
without serving the show cause notice. In this regard upon a
perusal of the impugned order we find that an attempt was made
by the respondent to serve the show cause notice at the wrong
address. This fact is admitted by the respondent.
3. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order, being an ex-
parte order, cannot be sustained as no opportunity of hearing
was given to the appellants and is quashed. The appeal is
allowed. The matter is remitted to the WTM to pass a fresh
order in accordance with law. In this regard the appellants will
appear before the WTM on April 10, 2023 on which date the
appellants will be served with the show cause notice and the 3
matter will proceed from there onwards in accordance with law.
The misc. application is disposed off accordingly.
4. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary
on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to
act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Certified copy of
this order is also available from the Registry on payment of
usual charges.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member PRERNA Digitally by PRERNA signed 20.03.2023 PK MANISH Date:
MANISH KHARE
KHARE 2023.03.21 16:21:05 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free