Financial Technologies (India) ... vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 437 of 2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A party is not a proper or necessary party to an appeal merely because an appeal against a regulator's refusal to extend a time limit for divestment is pending before the Tribunal; the fact of such pending proceedings is not a ground to implead a third-party company or to restrain it from passing a shareholder resolution amending its Articles of Association. Where the proposed corporate action of a third-party company is alleged to contravene the Companies Act, 2013, the appropriate remedy lies in approaching the authorities constituted under that Act, and not in impleading the company as a respondent to a securities appeal before the Tribunal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision: 16.06.2015
Misc. Application No. 214 of 2015 In Appeal No. 437 of 2014
Financial Technologies (India) Limited CTS No. 256 & 257, Suren Road, Chakala Andheri (East), Mumbai- 400 093 ...Appellant
Versus
1.
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051 ...Respondent No. 1
2. MCX Stock Exchange Limited Exchange Square, Suren Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai- 400 093 ...Respondent No. 2
3. MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited ...Proposed Respondent No. 3
Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Dhane, Advocate i/b Joby Mathew & Associates for the Appellant.
Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rushin Kapadia, Advocate i/b K. Ashar & Co. for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Akshay Patil, Advocate with Ms. Medha Agarwal, Advocate i/b Khare Legal Chambers for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3
CORAM: Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member
Per: Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1. By this Miscellaneous Application appellant seeks to implead
MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited as party respondent in Appeal 2
No. 437 of 2014 and pending disposal of the said appeal seeks an order
restraining MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited from taking steps
pursuant to resolution that may be passed in the Extra Ordinary General
Meeting scheduled on 16.06.2015 at 11.30 A.M. and if necessary SEBI
may be directed to issue suitable directions to MCX-SX Clearing
Corporation Limited.
2. In this case, SEBI by its order dated March 19, 2014 had directed
the appellant to divest its shareholding in the relevant entities including
the shares in MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited within the time
stipulated therein. Challenging the said order appellant had filed an
appeal before this Tribunal. While dismissing the said appeal on July 9,
2014 this Tribunal had extended the time to comply with the order of
SEBI by four weeks. Challenging the order of this Tribunal the appellant
has filed an appeal before the Apex Court and the same is admitted on
February 06, 2015. In the meantime, the appellant had filed an
application before SEBI seeking extension of time to divest the shares in
the various entities held by the appellant, without prejudice to its right in
the appeal pending before the Apex Court. The said application was
rejected by SEBI on 22.09.2014 and appeal filed against the said order is
pending before this Tribunal.
3. Mr. Dwarkadas, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf the
appellant submitted that even though MCX-SX Clearing Corporation
Limited is empowered to amend its Article of Association, the intended
resolution if passed would prejudicially affect the financial interest of the
appellant, and therefore this Tribunal be pleased to restrain MCX-SX 3
Clearing Corporation Limited from implementing the resolution that may
be passed, till the disposal of the Appeal No. 437 of 2014.
4. We see no merit in the above contentions.
5. Fact that SEBI has declined to grant extension of time to sell the
shares held by the appellant and the appeal filed by the appellant against
the said order is pending before this Tribunal cannot be a ground to
implead MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited as party respondent to
the appeal and to restrain MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited from
passing any resolution to amend its Articles of Association. MCX-SX
Clearing Corporation Limited is neither a proper nor a necessary party to
the appeal pending before this Tribunal. Moreover, if the proposed action
of MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited is in contravention of the
provisions of Companies Act, 2013 then the proper course for the
appellant is to move the authorities under the Companies Act, 2013 and
not to implead MCX-SX Clearing Corporation Limited as party
respondent to the appeal.
6. In these circumstances, we see no merit in the Miscellaneous
Application and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Jog Singh Member
16.06.2015 Prepared & Compared By: PK
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free