Miss Lucy
← All judgments

FIH Mauritius Investments Ltd, Mauritius — Combination C-2018/04/564

Competition Commission Of India4 May 2018

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Commission may approve a combination under Section 31(1) where, having assessed it against the factors in Section 20(4), it is of the opinion that the combination is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Where the acquirer acquires no rights in the target that it did not already hold, and the seller loses no rights in the target (including the right to nominate board members), the combination does not change the competitive dynamics in any market in which the parties operate, and so is not likely to have such an effect. An approval granted on the basis of information furnished by the acquirer stands revoked if that information is later found to be incorrect.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

Fair CompetitionFor Greater GoodCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA

4th May, 2018 Notice under Section 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by FIH Mauritius Investments Limited.

CORAM:

Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson

Mr. Sudhir Mital Member

Mr. Augustine Peter Member Mr. U.C. Nahta Member

Legal Representative: TT&A Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 1. On 9th April, 2018, the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) received a notice given by FIH Mauritius Investments Limited (“FIH Mauritius” / “Acquirer”) pursuant to Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) dated 29th March, 2018 entered into and between FIH Mauritius and Siemens Project Ventures GmbH (“Siemens” / “Seller”).

2. The proposed combination filed under sub-section (2) of Section 6 read with sub-section (a) of Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”), relates to acquisition of additional 6 percent of equity share capital of Bangalore International Airport Limited

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good (“BIAL”) by FIH Mauritius from Siemens. (hereinafter, FIH Mauritius and BIAL are collectively referred to as “Parties”).

3. FIH Mauritius, a private company incorporated in Mauritius for making investments in India, is an investment holding company and is not engaged in any trading or business. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fairfax India Holdings Corporation (“Fairfax India”), an entity incorporated in Canada. FIH Mauritius is present though its investment/ portfolio companies in India. Currently, FIH Mauritius holds 48 percent of the equity share capital of BIAL. 4. BIAL, a public company incorporated in India, is inter alia, engaged in operation and maintenance of an international airport at Bangalore. Apart from FIH Mauritius, its shareholders inter alia, include Karnataka State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (~13 percent), Airports Authority of India (~13 percent), Siemens Project Ventures GmbH (~26 percent).

5. Siemens, an entity incorporated in Germany, is inter alia, engaged in provision of project finance services. Siemens AG, an entity based in Germany, is the ultimate parent company of the ‘Siemens Group’ of companies. Siemens Group through its group companies is inter alia, engaged in business activities in sectors such as Power and Gas, Building Technologies, Mobility and Drives.

6. It is stated that as a result of proposed combination FIH Mauritius is not acquiring and Siemens is not losing any rights in BIAL including right to nominate members on the board of BIAL. 7. In the view of aforesaid, the proposed combination does not appears to change the competition dynamics in any markets in which the Parties are engaged. 8. Considering the facts on record, details provided in the notice given under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Act and assessment of the proposed combination on the basis of factors stated in sub-section (4) of Section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that proposed combination is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and therefore, the Commission, hereby, approves the same under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Act.

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good

9. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Acquirer is found to be incorrect. 10. The information provided by the Acquirer shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act. 11. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirer accordingly.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free