Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Electronics Components Industries, ... vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal25 February 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where the Assessing Officer has not rejected the assessee's books of account, the gross profit of the assessee cannot be estimated, and an addition made by estimating gross profit on the basis of earlier years is impermissible and must be deleted.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

I .T.A . N o. 20 46 / KOL ./ 20 1 4 As ses sm e nt y e ar : 20 10 - 20 1 1

Page 1 of 3

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA 'SM C' BENCH, KOLKATA

Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial M ember

I.T .A. No . 204 6 /KOL/ 2 01 4 Assess ment year : 2010 -2 01 1

M/s. Elec tronic s Comp onen ts Ind ustries,..........................A pp e lla nt 261 /76/77, G. T. Roa d (N orth), Sa lkia , Howra h -7 11 106 [PA N : AA A FE 7756 P]

-Vs.-

Joint Co mmissi oner of Income Ta x,................. ...................Resp ond e nt Ra ng e-48, Kolka ta , 3, Gove rnment Pla c e(West), Kol ka ta -700 001

Appeara nces by : Shri Sunil Sur ana, F. C. A. , f or the as sessee Shri K.L. Kanak, JCIT, Sr. D.R., for th e Department

Dat e of concluding t he hearin g : Feb ruary 25, 2015 Dat e of pr onouncing th e order : Feb ruary 25, 2015

O R D E R

Per Ge orge M athan:

This is an app eal filed by the assess ee a gain st th e order of ld. Commissioner of Inco me Ta x (Appea ls)-XXX, Kolkata in Appeal No. 87/CIT(A )-XXX/JCIT,R-48/2 012-13 date d 05. 08.2014 for the ass essment year 2 010-11.

2. Sh ri Sunil Su ran a, F .C.A., rep re sented o n behalf of the as ses se e and Sh ri K.L. Kanak, JCIT, Sr. D.R. rep resented on behalf of th e R evenue.

3. At the ti m e of hearin g, it was submitt ed b y the ld. A.R. th at the as se sse e is in th e b usiness o f el ect ronic goo ds and sp are p a rts. It wa s the submission that the A ssessin g Office r had esti mated the as se sse e's g ros s profit b y rejectin g th e assessee's boo ks of account s. It wa s th e submis sion that the n et p rofit of the asses see fo r the rel evant ass es sment year was I .T.A . N o. 20 46 / KOL ./ 20 1 4 As ses sm e nt y e ar : 20 10 - 20 1 1

Page 2 of 3

highe r than the e arlier year al so. It was the submis sion that the boo ks hav e not been reject ed. The esti mation o f the ass ess ee could not be done. It was th e submi ssion that th e o rde r o f the ld. CIT(Ap peals ) con fi rmin g the e sti mation may be rev ers ed.

4. In reply , ld. Sr. D.R. vehemently su pported th e ord er o f th e Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(Appe als).

5. Ld. A.R. also placed relian ce upon th e d ecision of th e Division Ben ch of this T ribunal in the ca se of SRK Tea Proces sin g Indu stries in ITA No. 1685/Kol/2009 dated 11.03.2011, wherein it has been held as follows :-

"In th e abs en ce of this finding and in the a bsence of r ejectio n of books o f acco unt, we are un able to accept that the Ass essing Officer h as rightly estimated th e gross profit. Accordingly, we are of the vi ew that th e lower au tho rities have err ed in ap plying gro ss profit rate o n th e basis of ea rlier years withou t r ejecting books of accou nt. W e allow the claim of the assess ee a nd this issue o f assessee's appeal is allowed".

6. I have considered the rival submis sion s. As it is notic ed that the issu e in this app eal i s squa rely covered by the deci sion of th e Division Bench of this Tribunal in the case o f SRK Tea Processin g Indust rie s referred to sup ra and as it i s noticed t hat the As sessin g Officer has not rejected the ass ess ee's book s of accoun t, the estimation of th e assessee's gross profit is not p ermissible. In the se circu mstances, the add ition m ade by the Ass es sin g Office r and a s confi rmed by the ld. CIT(Appeals) by estim atin g the a sse ss ee's gross p ro fit stands d elet ed.

7. In the result, the appeal filed by the ass essee is allowed.

Orde r p ronounced in th e open Co urt on 25 t h Feb rua ry, 2015.

Sd/-

George Mathan (Judicial M embe r) Kolkata, th e 25 t h day of Feb ruary , 2015 I .T.A . N o. 20 46 / KOL ./ 20 1 4 As ses sm e nt y e ar : 20 10 - 20 1 1

Page 3 of 3

Co pies to : (1) M/s. Elec tronic s Comp onen ts Ind ustries, 261 /76/77, G. T. Roa d (N orth), Sa lkia , Howra h -7 11 106

(2) Joint Co mmissi oner of Income Ta x, Ra ng e-48, Kolka ta , 3, Gove rnment Pla c e(West), Kol ka ta -700 001

(3) Comm iss ioner of Income-T ax (Appeal s ) (4) Com mis sioner of Incom e Tax (5) The Depar tmental R epr es entative (6) Guard Fil e By order

Assistant Registrar Income Tax App ellate Tribunal Kolkata Ben ch es, Kolkata Laha/Sr. P.S.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free