Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Efficient Investment Consultants Pvt ... vs Income Tax Officer & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 July 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Payment of the tax dues by a company does not, by itself, establish that a company whose name is sought to be restored under section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 is not liable to continue to face tax proceedings; where the Income Tax Department shows that assessment or reassessment proceedings against the company or its directors remain pending, that pendency is a sufficient ground on which the Tribunal may decline to interfere with an order refusing restoration of the company's name.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALNEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) No. 154 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

M/s. Efficient Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant

Versus

Income Tax Officer & Anr. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant : Mr. Anil Verma, Chartered Accountant

For Respondent : Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Easha Kadian, Advocate for Income Tax Deptt.

ORDER

08.07.2019 This appeal has been preferred by 'M/s. Efficient Investment

Consultants Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.' against the order dated 7th May, 2019 passed by

the 'National Company Law Tribunal' New Delhi, Bench-II (hereinafter referred

to as the 'Tribunal') in Appeal No. 893/252/ND/2018 in which the Tribunal

entertained the application filed u/s 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for

restoration of the name of the Appellant's Company namely 'M/s. Efficient

Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd.' Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Appellant submits that the tax amount payable to the Income-Tax Department

has already been paid and there was no reason to restore of the name of the

company.

2. Ms. Easha Kadian, Advocate appears on behalf of the Income Tax

Department and submits that for tax evasion, a notice has been issued to the

Directors of the Company for the Assessment Year 2011-2012 and for -2-

subsequent years, which are pending. It is also submitted that the Income-Tax

Department has also issued notice on 30th March, 2018 u/s 148 of the Income

Tax Act to the Respondent Company. In view of such stand taken by the Income

Tax Department, we are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order merely

on the ground that the company has paid the Income Tax. We find no merit in

the Appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)

[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc

Company Appeal (AT) No. 154 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free