Edelweiss Asset Reconstructions ... vs S Kumars Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 52 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, while it may permit parties to attempt settlement before deciding a financial creditor's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is bound by the statutory time frame in Section 7(4), which requires the application to be admitted or rejected within 14 days; an adjournment for settlement does not displace that obligation. Once the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied as to the existence of debt and default and as to the completeness of the application, it must pass an order of admission or rejection on merits, and it cannot leave the application pending indefinitely.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Edelweiss Asset Reconstructions Company Ltd. ....Appellant (acting in its capacity as trustee of EARC SC Trust 35) Vs. M/s. S. Kumars Ltd. ....Respondent Present: Appellant: Mr. RP Agrawal, Ms. Manisha Agrawal, Ms. Pragati Agrawal, Advocates. Respondent:
ORDER
(Through Virtual Mode)
28.01.2021: Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("I&B Code" for short) filed by the Appellant is stated to
be pending consideration for admission before the Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Court No.-II.
Mr. R.P. Agrawal, Advocate representing the Appellant- (Financial
Creditor) has invited our attention to the impugned order dated 2nd March,
2020 by virtue whereof parties were directed to complete the pleadings if the
endeavors for settlement do not fructify. The matter was posted for 15th April,
2021. According to Mr. R.P. Agrawal, learned counsel for the Appellant, the
matter has not been taken up thereafter.
Contd/-......
-2-
The statutory provision engrafted in Section 7(4) of the 'I&B Code' clearly
provides the time frame of 14 days for the Adjudicating Authority to decide the
application of Financial Creditor by either admitting or rejecting it. While one
may not find fault with the approach of the Adjudicating Authority in providing
an opportunity to the parties to work out a settlement, it needs to be
emphasized that the statutory provision has to be kept in view and the
Adjudicating Authority has to adhere to the statutory provisions. After
ascertaining debt and default and being satisfied of the completeness of the
application it is to pass an order of admission or rejection of application on
merit.
In the given circumstances, we would, therefore, dispose off this appeal
with a request to the Adjudicating Authority to list the matter in the coming
week and in the event of parties not reporting settlement, pass order of
admission or otherwise on merit after ascertaining debt and default and
completeness of the application.
Copy of this order be communicated to the Adjudicating Authority
forthwith.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Acting Chairperson
[Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra] Member (Technical)
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) AR/g Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 52 of 2021
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free