Miss Lucy
← All judgments

E. Shanmugam vs Bank Of India & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal16 October 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A former Managing Director of a corporate debtor, who was a financial creditor and who continued in office until a new management took over, is excluded from the Committee of Creditors where a conflict of interest arises from his prior role; the Adjudicating Authority's direction excluding him on that basis is sustainable and the appeal against it fails.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)No.1053 of 2019

IN THE MATTER OF: E.Shanmugam .....Appellant Vs. Bank of India & Ors. ......Respondents

Present : For Appellant: Ms. Ranjana Roy, Ms. Vasudha Sen, Ms. Ananya, Advocates

O R D E R

16.10.2019 - Two 'Financial Creditors' namely the 'Bank of India' and the

'Indian Overseas Bank' filed application for declaration that the Appellant

(Respondent No. 2 therein) and another 'M/s. Srinidhi Finance Pvt. Ltd.'

(Respondent No. 3 therein) are not 'Financial Creditors'.

The Adjudicating Authority ('National Company Law Tribunal')/Division

Bench, Chennai by impugned order dated 11th July, 2019 held that the Appellant

and the other person are rightly held to be the 'Financial Creditors'.

However, taking into consideration that the Appellant having continued

as Managing Director until before new management came in place of old

management there being a conflict of interest coming in between, the

'Resolution Professional' was directed not to include him as the member of the

'Committee of Creditors'. .....contd.

2

The grievance of the Appellant is against the orders of the Adjudicating

Authority wherein it is held that the Appellant is not to be included as a

member of the 'Committee of Creditors'. However, it is not in dispute that the

Appellant was the ex-Managing Director till new Management came in there

being a possibility of conflict of interest, the Appellant being an erstwhile

Managing Director he was rightly excluded as member of the 'Committee of

Creditors'. In the absence of any merit, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

[Justice A. I. S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)

[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)

ss/sk

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)No.1053 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free