E. Shanmugam vs Bank Of India & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)No.1053 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A former Managing Director of a corporate debtor, who was a financial creditor and who continued in office until a new management took over, is excluded from the Committee of Creditors where a conflict of interest arises from his prior role; the Adjudicating Authority's direction excluding him on that basis is sustainable and the appeal against it fails.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: E.Shanmugam .....Appellant Vs. Bank of India & Ors. ......Respondents
Present : For Appellant: Ms. Ranjana Roy, Ms. Vasudha Sen, Ms. Ananya, Advocates
O R D E R
16.10.2019 - Two 'Financial Creditors' namely the 'Bank of India' and the
'Indian Overseas Bank' filed application for declaration that the Appellant
(Respondent No. 2 therein) and another 'M/s. Srinidhi Finance Pvt. Ltd.'
(Respondent No. 3 therein) are not 'Financial Creditors'.
The Adjudicating Authority ('National Company Law Tribunal')/Division
Bench, Chennai by impugned order dated 11th July, 2019 held that the Appellant
and the other person are rightly held to be the 'Financial Creditors'.
However, taking into consideration that the Appellant having continued
as Managing Director until before new management came in place of old
management there being a conflict of interest coming in between, the
'Resolution Professional' was directed not to include him as the member of the
'Committee of Creditors'. .....contd.
2
The grievance of the Appellant is against the orders of the Adjudicating
Authority wherein it is held that the Appellant is not to be included as a
member of the 'Committee of Creditors'. However, it is not in dispute that the
Appellant was the ex-Managing Director till new Management came in there
being a possibility of conflict of interest, the Appellant being an erstwhile
Managing Director he was rightly excluded as member of the 'Committee of
Creditors'. In the absence of any merit, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice A. I. S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)
ss/sk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)No.1053 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free