Dhananjay Pralhad Salunkhe Patil vs New Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1458 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Whether a financial creditor qualifies as a secured creditor, where its claimed security rests on movable property and there is no security interest over immovable property, is a question of fact to be determined by the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors in the corporate insolvency resolution process, and the Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Tribunal cannot sit over that determination.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Dhananjay Pralhad Salunkhe Patil ...Appellant
Versus
New Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Dr. Dinesh Rattan Bhardwaj, Advocate
For Respondent : Mr. Basava P. Patil, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jatin Zaveri and Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Advocates
ORDER
19.12.2019 The grievance of the Appellant is that the Appellant has been
treated as 'unsecured financial creditor' by the 'Resolution Professional'. Against
the said decision, the Appellant moved an application before the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench, Mumbai which
rejected the application by impugned order dated 23rd October, 2019.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that the
impugned order is not a speaking order and the Adjudicating Authority has held
that the detailed order will follow.
However, we find, on the basis of the record, that the 'Resolution
Professional' and the 'Committee of Creditors' noticed that the Appellant's claim
of 'Secured Creditor' rests on movable properties and not on any immoveable
properties as there is no security interest on immovable properties and pledge in
respect of immoveable properties cannot be claimed. The 'Resolution -2-
Professional' and the 'Committee of Creditors' held that the Appellant - 'Financial
Creditor' is not a 'secured creditor'.
Whether the Appellant is a 'secured creditor' or not, is a question of fact
and it can be decided by the 'Resolution Professional' and any decision further
can be taken by the 'Committee of Creditors'. The Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal) or 'National Company Law Appellate Tribunal'
cannot sit over the decision of the 'Resolution Professional' or 'Committee of
Creditors in this regard.
For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere with the
impugned order. The Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1458 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free