Devanathan Ranganathan vs Idbi Bank Limited & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 507 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a financial creditor's Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed after the Code came into force, the limitation period applicable to it is that provided by Article 137 of Part II of the Third Division of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, namely three years running from the date on which the right to apply accrues. Where the debt has been classified as a non-performing asset and a recall notice has been issued, and the corporate debtor has thereafter failed to repay, the default is taken to have occurred after that notice, and the application filed within three years of that default is not barred by limitation.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Mr. Devanathan Ranganathan ...Appellant
Vs.
IDBI Bank Limited & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. M.K.S Menon and Ms. Diyangna Malik, Advocates.
For Respondents: - None.
O R D E R
23.05.2019─ This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant- Mr.
Devanathan Ranganathan against the order dated 25th February, 2019
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Division Bench, Chennai, whereby the Adjudicating Authority admitted
the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,
2016 ("I&B Code" for short) filed by 'M/s. IDBI Bank Limited'- ('Financial
Creditor').
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the claim of the
Bank and the date of default both are barred by limitation. However, we
are not inclined to accept such submission.
3. Admittedly, the loan amount of the 'Corporate Debtor' was
classified as 'Non-Performing Assets' (NPA) on 30th June, 2015 in
accordance with the guidelines of the 'Reserve Bank of India'. Even
Contd/-......
-2-
thereafter the 'Corporate Debtor' having not paid back the amount to the
Bank, recall notice dated 13th November, 2015 was sent to the 'Corporate
Debtor' and thereafter, the 'Corporate Debtor' having not repaid the
amount, the application under Section 7 was filed on 24th October, 2018.
4. For counting the period of limitation in filing the appeal under
Section 7, we find that Part II of Third Division of Schedule of Limitation
Act, 1963 i.e. Article 137 is applicable, which reads as follows:
Part II-OTHER APPLICATION Description of application Period of Limitation Time from which period begins to run
137. Any other application for which Three years When the right to no period of limitation is provided apply accrues elsewhere in this division.
5. The 'I&B Code' having come into force since 1st December, 2016
and the application having been filed on 24th October, 2018, we hold
that the application under Section 7 is well within the time and is not
barred by limitation. Further, as we find that the default has occurred
after notice issued on 13th November, 2015 and application having been
filed on 24th October, 2018, we hold that the claim is also not barred by
limitation.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 507 of 2019 -3-
6. For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere with the
impugned order dated 25th February, 2019. The appeal is accordingly
dismissed. No costs.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice A.I.S. Cheema) Member(Judicial)
(Kanthi Narahari) Member(Technical) Ar/g
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 507 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free