Deputy Commissioner Customs vs M/S Gujarat Nre Coke Limited @ Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 511 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority's rejection of a belated claim, filed after the order of liquidation and after the Liquidator has already disposed of several of the corporate debtor's properties, is not an error where the delay is long and the proceedings are well advanced; a belated claim at such a stage may be refused condonation of delay.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Deputy Commissioner Customs Division, Jamnagar ...Appellant
Versus
Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Mr. Arjun Asthana, Advocates for R-2 (Liquidator)
ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
20.05.2022: Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. This Appeal has
been filed against order of the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal) Kolkata Bench, Kolkata dated 18.11.2021 by which order the
application filed by the Applicant/ Appellant for condonation of delay of 1010
days in filing of claim has been rejected.
2. CIRP against the Corporate Debtor was initiated on 07.04.2017. The
order for liquidation was passed on 11.01.2018. Thereafter, a claim on behalf
of the Appellant was submitted on 18.11.2020 which was not accepted by the
Liquidator, hence, an application was filed before the Adjudicating Authority
which came to be rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that delay was not of 1010
days but it was for about 700 and some odd days. Be that as it may. The
order of liquidation was passed long ago i.e. on 11.01.2018 and CIRP was
initiated in the year 2017.
Cont'd..../ 2
4. Learned counsel for the Appellant after obtaining instructions submits
that further in the liquidation proceedings the Liquidator has already disposed
of several properties of the Corporate Debtor.
5. We do not find any error in the order of the Adjudicating Authority
rejecting the Application at such belated stage. We see no reason to entertain
this Appeal. The Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
[Naresh Salecha] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 511 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free