Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Department Of State Tax vs Topworth Pipes & Tubes Private Limited & ...

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal24 February 2023Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The appeal is dismissed by following the Tribunal's earlier decision in Company Appeal (AT)(Ins.) No. 246/2022, which the court treats as fully covering the same issue; the reasoning on the merits is contained in that earlier judgment, not in this order.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH,NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 479 of 2022

IN THE MATTER OF: Department of State Tax Through the Dy. Commissioner of State Tax ...Appellant

Versus

Topworth Pipes & Tubes Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents

Present:

For Appellant : Mr. Rahul Chitnis and Mr. Aaditya Pande, Advocates

For Respondents : Sharmistha Ghosh, Ms. Palak Nenwani, Ms. Aditi Sinha, Advocates for R-1 & R-3 Ms. Honey Satpal, Advocate for R2.

ORDER

24.02.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.

This appeal has been filed against the order of the Adjudicating

Authority dated 09.03.2021 passed by 'National Company Law Tribunal,

Mumbai Bench, Court No. 1 by which Adjudicating Authority has

extinguished the claim of the Appellant, the Department of State Tax.

2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant sought to contend that Appellant's

claim should be treated as Secured Creditor's claim and the Adjudicating

Authority committed error.

Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 479 of 2022

1

3. The similar issue has already been considered by this Tribunal and

rejected in Company Appeal(AT)(Ins.) No. 246/2022 decided on 07.02.2023.

This appeal is fully covered by the judgement of this Tribunal dated

07.02.2023. Following the said judgement, this appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) ss/nn

Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 479 of 2022

2

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free