Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Department Of State Tax vs Dar Media Private Limited & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1 February 2024Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a creditor's claim is lodged after the Committee of Creditors has already approved the resolution plan, and after the resolution professional has filed the plan for approval before the Adjudicating Authority, the resolution professional is not in error in refusing to admit that late claim.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 73 of 2024& I.A. No. 155, 232 of 2024IN THE MATTER OF:

Department of State Tax ...Appellant

Versus

Dar Media Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant: Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Advocate. For Respondents:

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

01.02.2024: I.A. No.232 of 2024: This is an application praying for

condonation of 15 days' delay in filing the Appeal. Learned counsel for the

Appellant submits that the Appellant came to know about the order on

29.09.2023 and thereafter some time was taken in obtaining necessary

approval from the higher authorities. Cause shown sufficient, delay in

condoned. I.A. No.232 of 2024 is disposed of.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. This Appeal has been filed

against order dated 29.08.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in I.A.

No.1219 of 2023.

3. In the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor, public announcement was made

on 15.05.2022 and last date for submission of claim was 26.05.2022.

Appellant lodged its claim on 06.02.2023. The Resolution Professional refused

Cont'd.../ -2-

to admit the claim informing that the application for approval of Resolution

Plan has already been filed before the Adjudicating Authority on 03.02.2023.

4. The aforesaid clearly indicate that the resolution plan was approved by

the CoC prior to 03.02.2023 and the claim which was filed by the Appellant

was subsequent to approval of the plan by the CoC. When the plan was

already approved by the CoC, we are of the view that no error has been

committed by the Resolution Professional in refusing to admit the claim. The

Adjudicating Authority has rightly rejected I.A. No.1219 of 2023 filed by the

Appellant. There is no merit in the Appeal. Appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) Archana/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.73 of 2024

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free