Deepak Seth vs Moods Hospitality Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 395 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, when a financial creditor's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is complete and no dispute as to debt or default is shown, must decide it either by admitting it or, where there is a defect, by directing the applicant to remove the defect; it may reject the application only if it is not maintainable or there is no ground for admission, and without going into the merits.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Deepak Seth ...Appellant
Vs.
Moods Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: - Ms. Gayatri Verma and Mr. Bhuvan Arora, Advocates.
ORDER
26.07.2018─ Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant
submits that the Appellant- Mr. Deepak Seth, 'Financial Creditor' has
already filed application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "I&B Code") in
February, 2018 but it has not been admitted because of the delaying
tactics of the 'Corporate Debtor'. It is informed that in March, 2018, the
'Corporate Debtor' has filed reply and admitted the dues.
2. We agree with the submission made on behalf of the Appellant, if
the application under Section 7 is complete has been filed by the
'Financial Creditor', in absence of any dispute relating to debt or default,
the application is to be decided either way by admitting and in case of
defect asking the Applicant to remove the defects. If otherwise the
application is not maintainable or no ground, it can be rejected without
Contd/-............
-2-
going into the merit of the case. As this matter to be decided by the
learned Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Principal Bench, New Delhi, we are not expressing any opinion with a
request to the Adjudicating Authority to pass appropriate order in
accordance with law.
3. The appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. No cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) Ar/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 395 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free