Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Deepa Mohan Naik vs Chandra Bhusan Pal

Supreme Court4 October 2021S. Ravindra Bhat

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

In matrimonial cases, a transfer petition between courts situated in different states may be granted on the ground that the venue is inconvenient or unjustified, where the facts and circumstances and overall interest of justice justify such transfer; the deciding court considers the residential location of the parties and appropriateness of the transferee forum among such relevant factors.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.2241 OF 2018

DEEPA MOHAN NAIK Petitioner

VERSUS

CHANDRA BHUSAN PAL Respondent

O R D E R

This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife

seeking transfer of petition filed by the respondent-husband in the

Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar to the

Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, Goa.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of

the opinion that another attempt for securing an amicable

settlement through mediation should be made by the parties.

Considering the facts and circumstances on the record and

overall interest of justice, this Court is of the opinion that

request for transfer of proceedings from the Court at Bhojpur, Ara,

Bihar to the Court at Panaji, Goa, is justified.

Consequently, the petition being Matrimonial Case No.84 of

2017, titled as “Chandra Bhusan Pal v. Deepa Mohan Naik”, pending

in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar

is transferred to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Dr. Mukesh Nasa Date: 2021.10.08

Goa.

09:04:41 IST Reason:

2

The Family Court at Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar is directed to

transmit the entire record to the transferee Court immediately.

The transferee Court shall in the first instance refer the

parties to the Mediation Centre of the Bombay High Court, Goa

Bench. The Mediation Centre shall conduct the proceedings as per

the choice of the parties - if so required by Video-Conferencing

mode as well.

The transferee Court shall not proceed with the case for eight

weeks, during which period the mediation proceedings may be

pending. In case no settlement is arrived at between the parties,

the case shall be taken up after said period of eight weeks. This

period shall commence from the date of receipt of the papers from

the Court at Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar alongwith the order of this Court.

The transferee Court shall decide the case so transferred as

expeditiously as possible.

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this Order to both

the Courts immediately for compliance.

This transfer petition is allowed accordingly.

.................................J. [S. RAVINDRA BHAT]

NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 04, 2021

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free