D S Kulkarni Developers Ltd vs Bank Of Maharashtra
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 414 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal's power to condone delay in filing an appeal under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is confined to a further period not exceeding 15 days beyond the 30-day limitation period; the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond that statutory extension, and an appeal filed outside the combined period is liable to be dismissed as barred by time.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: M/s. D. S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus Bank of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Advocate Archis Joshi For Respondent:
ORDER
(Virtual Mode) 19.04.2022: This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated
26.09.2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal, Mumbai Bench) in CP 1633(IB)/MB/2019 by which the moratorium
was enforced after admitting the Petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'Code'). An application for
condonation of delay being I.A. No. 1084/2022 has been filed. The ground taken
in the Delay Condonation Application is that the Directors of the Appellant were
in the Judicial Custody hence they were not able to take steps for filing the
Appeal.
2. A perusal of the Order indicates that three counsels appeared for the
Respondents who are Appellant before us. In the Delay Condonation Application
there is no ground taken that Appellants were not aware of the Order dated
26.09.2019. This Appeal has been filed on 28th October, 2021 and the Limitation 2
for filing an Appeal as provided under Section 61(2) of the Code is 30 days and
the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal is empowered to condone the
delay not exceeding 15 days in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 61(2) of the
Code. This Tribunal cannot condone the delay which has caused in filing this
Appeal.
3. We thus do not find any ground to condone the inordinate delay in filing
the Appeal. Application for Condonation of Delay is rejected and consequently
the Appeal is dismissed as barred by time.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn Company Appeal (AT) Ins. No. 414 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free