Continental Carriers Pvt. Ltd vs Camson Agri-Ventures Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 523 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an operational creditor's application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is founded on a demand notice, and the corporate debtor had, before the demand notice was issued, raised a dispute concerning the quality or timeliness of the services rendered, the existence of such a pre-notice dispute renders the application not maintainable and it must be rejected.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Continental Carriers Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Vs.
Camson Agri-Ventures Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Adhish Sharma and Mr. Neeraj Malik, Advocates.
O R D E R
16.05.2019─ The Appellant filed an application under Section 9 of
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("I&B Code" for short) for
initiation of 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' against 'M/s.
Camson Agri Ventures Private Limited'- ('Corporate Debtor'). The
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Bengaluru
Bench, on hearing the counsel for the parties, by impugned order dated
12th April, 2019 rejected the application on the ground of 'existence of
dispute'.
2. On hearing learned counsel for the Appellant and on perusal of the
record, we find that Demand Notice under Section 8(1) of the 'I&B Code'
was issued by the Appellant on 30th October, 2017. Much prior to
issuance of demand notice by e-mail dated 6th March, 2017, the
Contd/-..............
-2-
'Corporate Debtor' raised dispute about insufficient services in sending
the goods on time.
3. Admittedly, the Appellant is a transport carrier which provides
services and not the goods. There being a dispute about providing proper
services, we hold that the application under Section 9 was not
maintainable.
4. In absence of any merit, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice A.I.S. Cheema) Member(Judicial)
(Kanthi Narahari) Member(Technical) Ar/g
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 523 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free