Consolidated Engineering Company vs Subodh Kumar Agarwal & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1112 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, when considering whether to approve a resolution plan, must examine whether operational creditors have been given the same treatment as financial creditors, and where such treatment is discriminatory it may pass appropriate orders in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Consolidated Engineering Company ...Appellant
Vs.
Subodh Kumar Agarwal & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Bhavya Sethi and Mr. Saikat Sarkar, Advocates.
O R D E R
23.10.2019─ Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the
approved 'Resolution Plan' was neither gone through by any of the
'Operational Creditors' nor details thereof discussed by the 'Committee of
Creditors' while approving the 'Resolution Plan'.
According to the counsel for the Appellant, 'NIL' amount has been
given to all the 'Operational Creditors' except one 'Operational Creditor'
and thereby the 'Resolution Applicant' has discriminated between the
'Financial Creditors' and the 'Operational Creditors'.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, as we find that the
Adjudicating Authority has not yet approved the 'Resolution Plan', we allow
the Appellant to appear before the Adjudicating Authority on the next date.
The Adjudicating Authority while considering the 'Resolution Plan' will
consider whether the 'Operational Creditors' have been given the same
Contd/-.............
-2-
treatment as given to the 'Financial Creditors' or not. If it is discriminatory,
it will be open to the Adjudicating Authority to pass appropriate order as per
the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. &
Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.─ Writ Petition (Civil) No. 99 of 2018".
The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations and
directions. No costs.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Venugopal M) Member(Judicial)
(Justice Jarat Kumar Jain) Member(Judicial) Ar/g
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1112 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free