Committee Of Creditors vs Sonu Jain Rp For Marina Projects Pvt Ltd & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1115 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Interim Resolution Professional's fee cannot be borne by the Corporate Debtor, even with the consent of the Operational Creditor, because Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (moratorium) bars recovery from the Corporate Debtor during the insolvency process. The Committee of Creditors is liable to pay the Interim Resolution Professional's fee, and that amount may be adjusted out of the Insolvency Resolution Process, including the fee of the Interim Resolution Professional.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Committee of Creditors ...Appellant
Versus
Mrs. Sonu Jain, Resolution Professional for Marina Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya, Mr. Debarpita Basu Mukherjee and Mr. Mangaljit Mukherjee, Advocates
For Respondent : Mr. Vinod Kumar Chaurasia, Advocate ORDER
23.10.2019 This is an unfortunate Appeal filed by the 'Committee of
Creditors' without appreciating the provisions of the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016'. With regard to the Fee of the 'Resolution Professional', the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench,
Kolkata directed the 'Committee of Creditors' to pay the Fee to the 'Resolution
Professional' @ Rupees One Lakh per month.
2. Learned counsel for Appellant submits that in the meeting of the
'Committee of Creditors' which held on 18th May, 2019 at 'Item No. 1' with regard
to the determination of fee of 'Interim Resolution Professional, the following
decision was taken:
"ANY OTHER MATTER WITH THE PERMISSION OF CHAIRPERSON
ITEM NO. 1 : DETERMINATION OF FEES OF IRP
The IRP in the meeting had laid down an issue
stating the fact that her fees should be taken into
consideration. She proposed her fees to be -2-
Rs. 1,00,000 per month. The Corporate Debtor
with the consent of Operation Creditor had decided
to bear the IRP fees."
3. In view of Section 14 of the 'I&B Code' there being a provision of 'Recovery'
and as no amount can be taken from the 'Corporate Debtor', we are of the view
that even with the consent of the 'Operational Creditor', the 'Corporate Debtor'
cannot bear the Fee of the 'Interim Resolution Professional'. The Adjudicating
Authority had rightly directed the 'Committee of Creditors' to pay the Fees, which
according to us, can be adjusted from the 'Insolvency Resolution Process' which
includes the Fee of the 'Interim Resolution Professional'.
We find no merit in the Appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial)
[Justice Jarat Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial) /ns/sk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1115 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free