Commissioner Of Customs (Import), ... vs M/S. Sanjay Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd
- Case No.Appeal No. C/744/2006
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal will not entertain a departmental appeal where the amount involved is below the monetary threshold fixed by the CBEC circular for filing appeals before the Tribunal, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed, leaving the underlying issue open.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 04(Gr.IIC & D)2006(JNCH) dated 02.02.2006 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-II)
For approval and signature: Honble Mr. P.S.Pruthi, Member (Technical)
Honble Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial)
============================================================
1. Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see : No the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?
2. Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the : No CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : Seen of the Order?
4. Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental : Yes authorities?
=============================================================
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva :
Appellant
VS
M/s. Sanjay Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd. :
Respondent
Appearance
Shri Chatru Singh, Assistant Commissioner (A.R.) for Appellant
Shri H.R. Shetty, Advocate for respondent
CORAM:
Mr. P.S.Pruthi, Member (Technical) Mr. Ramesh Nair (Judicial)
Date of hearing : 21/07/2015 Date of decision : 21/07/2015
ORDER NO.
Per : P.S. Pruthi
This appeal is filed by the revenue.
2. After hearing the departmental Representative and perusal of records, we find that the amount involved in this case is less than Rs. Five Lakhs. As per the CBEC Circular Number 390/MISC./163/2010-GC dated 27th August 2011, monetary limit of Rs. Five Lakhs is fixed for filing the appeal to the Tribunal.
3. Since the amount is less than threshold limit, we dismiss the appeal keeping the issue involved open for deciding in an appropriate manner.
4. Appeal is dismissed.
(Dictated in court)
(Ramesh Nair) Member (Judicial)
(P.S.Pruthi) Member (Technical)
SM.
2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free