Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S. Andhra Organics Ltd
- CitationAppeal No. 47/2012
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The tour operator services used by an assessee to transport its workers and staff between their residences and the factory premises are an input service eligible for CENVAT credit, and the assessee is therefore entitled to avail credit of the service tax paid on them.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 47/2012(V-I) CE dated 30/08/2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Visakhapatnam.]
For approval and signature:
HON'BLE SMT. ARCHANA WADHWA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1 Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982? No 2 Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not? No 3 Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the Order? Seen 4 Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities? Yes
Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax VISAKHAPATNAM-I CENTRAL EXCISE BUILDING PORT AREA VISAKHAPATNAM 530 035. ANDHRA PRADESH Appellant(s)
Versus
M/s. ANDHRA ORGANICS LTD PYDIBHIMAVARTAM, SRIKAKULAM DIST A.P. Respondent(s)
Appearance:
Mr. N. Jagadish, Superintendent (AR) For the Appellant
None For the Respondent
Date of Hearing: 23/06/2015
Date of Decision: 23/06/2015
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. ARCHANA WADHWA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Final Order No. 21415 / 2015
Per : ARCHANA WADHWA
The short issue required to be decided in the present appeal of the Revenue is as to whether the respondents are entitled to avail CENVAT credit of service tax paid on tour operator services used by them for transporting their workers and staff from the residents to the factory premises. Commissioner (A) has, by relying upon various decisions of the Honble High Court as also the Tribunal has held in favour of the assessee.
2. I find that there are number of precedent decisions of the Tribunal holding that such transportation of service is a cenvatable input service. One such reference can be made to Honble Karnataka High Courts decision in the case of CCE, Bangalore vs. Milipore India Pvt. Ltd.: 2012 (26) STR 514 (Kar.). As such, I find no infirmity in the impugned order of Commissioner (A). Revenues appeal is accordingly rejected.
(Order pronounced and dictated in open court on 23.6.2015.)
ARCHANA WADHWA JUDICIAL MEMBER rv
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free