Coal India Ltd vs Gulf Coil Lubricants India Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 807 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has been admitted and the principal debt has already been paid and the claim settled before the Committee of Creditors is constituted, the Adjudicating Authority's admission order may be set aside and the application dismissed, since the settlement, made at a stage where no Committee of Creditors exists, is one the Tribunal may permit under its inherent powers, and the admission order having failed to take account of the payment of principal and the contractual position on interest cannot stand. Consequent orders made pursuant to a set-aside admission, including the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional, the declaration of moratorium and freezing of accounts, and any action taken under them, fall with it, and the corporate debtor is released from the Code's restrictions and permitted to function through its Board of Directors.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Coal India Ltd. ...Appellant
Vs.
Gulf Coil Lubricants India Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Mr. Sandeep Bisht, Mr. Anuj Tiwari, Mr. Shikhar Shivastan and Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocates.
For Respondents: - Mr. Shwetaank Nigam, Advocate for R-1.
ORDER
11.02.2019─ An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("I&B Code" for short) was filed by 'M/s. Gulf Oil
Lubricants India Limited'- ('Operational Creditor') for initiation of the
'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' against 'Eastern Coalfields
Limited'. The said application has been admitted by impugned order
dated 19th December, 2018 by the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata. The present appeal has
been preferred by 'Coal India Limited'.
2. On 22nd December, 2018, when the matter was taken up, taking
into consideration the submissions made by learned Senior Counsel for
the Appellant, the following order was passed:
Contd/-..............
-2-
"22.12.2018 Learned Senior Counsel referred
to the impugned order and enclosures annexed thereto,
to suggest that the principal amount had already been
paid and as per the terms of Agreement/ Contract, no
interest is payable. This fact, though, noticed by the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal, Kolkata Bench), Kolkata, in spite of that
impugned order dated 19th December, 2018 has been
passed in an application under Section 9 of the I&B
Code, 2016.
It is also informed that parties have already
settled the claim and nothing payable to the
respondents (Operational Creditor).
Let notice be issued on respondents by Speed
Post.
The requisite be filed by 26th December, 2018
by 11:00 AM. If the appellant provides email address
of the respondents, let notice be issued through e-mail
also.
Post the matter for admission before the 1st
Court on 29th January, 2019 within two cases. Appeal
may be disposed of at the stage of admission.
Until further orders, the operation of the
impugned order dated 19th December, 2018 passed in
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 807 of 2018 -3-
CP (IB) No. 228/KB/2018 by NCLT Kolkata Bench
shall remain stayed. The Resolution Professional, if
joined may report."
3. Pursuant to the notice, the Respondent has appeared.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting Respondent-
'M/s. Gulf Oil Lubricants India Limited'- ('Operational Creditor') accepts
that the principal amount was paid prior to the admission of the
application under Section 9 and interest has been paid and matter has
been settled by agreement dated 26th January, 2019.
5. It is submitted that such settlement has already been made prior
to the constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors'.
6. In the case of 'Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India
& Ors. - Writ Petition (Civil) No. 99 of 2018', the Hon'ble Supreme
Court observed as follows:
"52. It is clear that once the Code gets triggered by
admission of a creditor's petition under
Sections 7 to 9, the proceeding that is before
the Adjudicating Authority, being a collective
proceeding, is a proceeding in rem. Being a
proceeding in rem, it is necessary that the body
which is to oversee the resolution process must
be consulted before any individual corporate
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 807 of 2018 -4-
debtor is allowed to settle its claim. A question
arises as to what is to happen before a
committee of creditors is constituted (as per the
timelines that are specified, a committee of
creditors can be appointed at any time within
30 days from the date of appointment of the
interim resolution professional). We make it
clear that at any stage where the committee of
creditors is not yet constituted, a party can
approach the NCLT directly, which Tribunal
may, in exercise of its inherent powers under
Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, allow or
disallow an application for withdrawal or
settlement. This will be decided after hearing
all the concerned parties and considering all
relevant factors on the facts of each case."
7. In view of the fact that the parties have now settled the matter prior
to the constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors' and the Adjudicating
Authority has failed to notice that the principal amount has already been
paid and original plea of the 'Corporate Debtor' was that no interest was
payable in terms of the Agreement/ Contract, we set aside the impugned
order dated 19th December, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
8. In effect, order (s), passed by the Adjudicating Authority appointing
'Interim Resolution Professional', declaring moratorium, freezing of
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 807 of 2018 -5-
account, and all other order (s) passed by the Adjudicating Authority
pursuant to impugned order and action, if any, taken by the 'Interim
Resolution Professional', including the advertisement published in the
newspaper calling for applications all such orders and actions are
declared illegal and are set aside. The application preferred by
Respondent under Section 9 of the 'I&B Code' is dismissed. Learned
Adjudicating Authority will now close the proceeding. The 'Corporate
Debtor' (company) is released from all the rigour of law and is allowed to
function independently through its Board of Directors from immediate
effect.
9. The Adjudicating Authority will fix the fee of 'Interim Resolution
Professional' and the 'Corporate Debtor' will pay the fees of the 'Interim
Resolution Professional' for the period he has functioned. The appeal is
allowed with aforesaid observation. However, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) Ar/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 807 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free