Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Classic Global Finance & Capital Ltd. vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal10 February 2017J. P. Devadhar

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Adjudicating Officer, having imposed a penalty under Section 15C of the SEBI Act by applying the provision as it stood before its amendment with effect from September 8, 2014, instead of the amended provision in force at the relevant time, acted without applying the governing law; an order so passed, which was also made ex parte without affording the affected party an opportunity of personal hearing, is liable to be quashed and set aside and remitted to the Adjudicating Officer for fresh determination on merits in accordance with the law in force, after granting a personal hearing.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

DATE : 10.02.2017

Appeal No. 170 of 2016

Classic Global Finance & Capital Ltd. Office No. 8, IInd Floor, Sodhi Complex, Miller Gang, Opp. Ramgarhia School, Ludhiana, Punjab - 141003. ..... Appellant

Versus

Securities & Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent

Ms. Shreya Parekh, Advocate with Mr. Amit B. Dey, Advocate, Mr. Niralimuhhi, Company Secretary, i/b Mindspright Legal for the Appellant. Mr. Rajesh Nagori, Advocate with Mr. Anubhav Ghosh, Advocate i/b The Law Point for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice J. P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member Dr. C. K. G. Nair, Member

Per : Justice J. P. Devadhar (Oral)

1.

This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by Adjudicating

officer ('AO' for short) of Securities and Exchange Board of India ('SEBI'

for short) on March 9, 2016 whereby maximum penalty of ` 1 crore is

imposed on the appellant under Section 15C of SEBI Act.

2. It is not in dispute that in the impugned order, the AO has applied

Section 15C as it stood prior to its amendment on September 8, 2014, when

in fact the AO ought to have applied Section 15C as amended with effect

from September 8, 2014. Moreover, the impugned order is an ex-parte

order.

2

3. In these circumstances, the impugned order is quashed and set aside

and restored to the file of the AO for passing fresh order on merits and in

accordance with law after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the

appellant.

4. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Justice J. P. Devadhar Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Jog Singh Member

Sd/-

Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member

10.02.2017 Prepared & Compared by PTM

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free