Chharia Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Brys International Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 126 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
It is mandatory under Section 7(3)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for a financial creditor filing an application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process to furnish the name of the resolution professional proposed to act as interim resolution professional, the word "shall" in that provision being mandatory in contrast to the permissive "may" in Section 9(4) for operational creditors. Where a financial creditor's application under Section 7 is defective for want of the proposed interim resolution professional's name, the Adjudicating Authority must, under the proviso to Section 7, give the applicant notice to rectify the defect within seven days before rejecting the application; an application is not to be rejected as incomplete without that opportunity. Where the financial creditor has in fact proposed the name of an interim resolution professional in the prescribed Form-1 with consent annexed, the requirement of Section 7(3)(b) is satisfied, and an order dismissing the application on the ground that no such name was proposed cannot be sustained; the matter is remitted for admission if the application is otherwise complete.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Chharia Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
Brys International Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Respondents
Present: For Appellant:- Mr. Pawan Sharma and Ms. Arpita Yadav, Advocates.
ORDER
30.08.2017- The appellant who claimed to be 'Financial Creditor' filed an
application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as "I & B Code") for initiation of 'Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process' against the Respondents-A4/s. Brys
International Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ('Corporate Debtor'). Ld. Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi,
by impugned order dated 22nd June, 2017 dismissed the application under
section 7 of the 'I & B Code' preferred by appellant with the following
observations: -
"On reading of the above 2 sub-sections, it is apparent that while there is a provision for the Adjudicating Authority to make a reference to the Board for a recommendation of an Insolvency professional, in the case of an operational creditor, there is no such provision in the case of a financial creditor. The instant application has been filed under section 7 of IBC as a financial creditor. The applicant financial creditor has not proposed the name 2
of any insolvency professional and thus, has not fulfilled the requirement as in sub-section 3 (b) of section 7 of the Code, which reads as follows: -
'The financial creditor shall, along with the application furnish -
(a) Record of the default recorded with the information utility or such other record or evidence of default as may be specified'
(b) the name of the resolution professional proposed toact as an interim resolution professional; and
(c) any other information as may be specified by the Board."
Hence, we are unable to admit the application for
insolvency as the same is not complete.
Application is dismissed."
2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant had
proposed the name of the 'Interim Resolution Professional' and referred
to Part-Ill of the application filed under section 7 in format to suggest
that name of one "Mr. Vivek Raheja, R/o CU-49, Pitampura, Delhi-
110088 with e-mail address vivekvpgs.in and Registration No.
IBBI / IPA-0 1 / IP-00006 / 2016-17" along with consent letter of the 'Interim
Resolution Professional' in Annexure A-4 attached thereto. It is also
submitted that non-furnishing the name of proposed 'Interim Resolution
Professional' will not render the application incomplete.
3. The questions arise for consideration in this appeal are: 3
(i) Whether it is mandatory for a 'Financial Creditor' to
propose the name of 'Interim Resolution Professional'
in an application under section 7 of the 'I&B Code'?
(ii) Whether in absence of proposal of name of 'Interim
Resolution Professional' the application is incomplete?
(iii) Whether the impugned order dated 22nd June,
2017 is legal and valid?
4. Before deciding the first two questions, it is desirable to notice the
relevant facts as pleaded by the parties.
5. Appellant has pleaded and not disputed by respondents that the
appellant preferred an application under section 7 in Form-1 of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules,
2016. In the said Form-1, the appellant has proposed the name of
'Interim Resolution Professional', as apparent from the record and
noticed in the preceding paragraph. In view of such admitted facts, the
impugned order dated 22nd June, 2017 cannot be sustained and the
matter is required to be remitted back to the Ld. Adjudicating Authority
for admission of the case, if the application is otherwise complete.
6. To determine the question as to whether it is mandatory for the
'Financial Creditor' to propose the name of an 'Interim Resolution
ProfessiOnal' in the application under section 7 of the 'I&B Code', it is
desirable to notice the relevant provisions.
7. As per clause (b) of Sub-section (3) of Section 7 the 'Financial
Creditor' required to furnish name of the resolution professional proposed 4
to act as an 'Interim Resolution Professional', the relevant portion of
which reads as follows: -
"7. Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution
process by financial creditor. --(1) A financial
creditor either by itself or jointly with other financial
creditors may file an application for initiating
corporate insolvency resolution process against a
corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority
when a default has occurred.
Explanation. --For the purposes of this sub-
section, a default includes a default in respect of a
financial debt owed not only to the applicant
financial creditor but to any other financial creditor
of the corporate debtor.
(2) The financial creditor shall make an application
under sub-section (1) in such form and manner and
accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.
(3) The financial creditor shall, along with the
application furnish--
(a) record of the default recorded with the
information utility or such other record or
evidence of default as may be specified;
(b) the name of the resolution professional
proposed to act as an interim resolution
professional; and 5
(c) any other information as may be specified
by the Board.
(4) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen
days of the receipt of the application under sub-section
(2), ascertain the existence of a default from the records
of an information utility or on the basis of other
evidence furnished by the financial creditor under sub-
section (3)."
8. However, under sub-section (4) of Section 9 an 'Operational
Creditor' has been given option to propose the name of any 'Interim
Resolution Professional' of its own choice, which reads as follows:
"9. Application for initiation of corporate
insolvency resolution process by operational
creditor.--(1) After the expiry of the period of ten days
from the date of delivery of the notice or invoice
demanding payment under sub-section (1) of section 8, if
the operational creditor does not receive payment from
the corporate debtor or notice of the dispute under sub-
section (2) of section 8, the operational creditor may file
an application before the Adjudicating Authority for
initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process.
(2) The application under sub-section (1) shall be filed in
such form and manner and accompanied with such fee
as may be prescribed.
6
(3) The operational creditor shall, along with the
application furnish--
(a) a copy of the invoice demanding payment or
demand notice delivered by the operational creditor
to the corporate debtor;
(b) an affidavit to the effect that there is no notice
given by the corporate debtor relating to a dispute of
the unpaid operational debt;
(c) a copy of the certificate from the financial
institutions maintaining accounts of the operational
creditor confirming that there is no payment of an
unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor;
and
(d) such other information as may be specified.
(4) An operational creditor initiating a corporate
insolvency resolution process under this section, may
propose a resolution professional to act as an interim
resolution professional.
xxx
9. From the aforesaid provision, it is clear that the 'Operational
Creditor' may provide the name of an 'Interim Resolution Professional'
and in a particular case, the 'Operational Creditor' may not provide the
name of the 'Operational Creditor'.
10. In so far the 'Corporate Applicant' is concerned, in their case
provision has been made under clause (b) of sub-section (3) of Section 10 to furnish the name of 'Interim Resolution Professional', as quoted
below: -
"10. Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution
process by corporate applicant. - (1) Where a
corporate debtor has committed a default, a corporate
applicant thereof may file an application for initiating
corporate insolvency resolution process with the
Adjudicating Authority.
(2) The application under sub-section (1) shall be filed in
such form, containing such particulars and in such
manner and accompanied with such fee as may be
prescribed.
(3) The corporate applicant shall, along with the
application furnish the information relating to--
(a) its books of account and such other documents
relating to such period as may be specified; and
(b) the resolution professional proposed to be
appointed as an interim resolution professional.
(4) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within a period of
fourteen days of the receipt of the application, by an
order--
(a) admit the application, if it is complete; or
(b) reject the application, if it is incomplete:
Provided that Adjudicating Authority shall, before
rejecting an application, give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defects in his application
within seven days from the date of receipt of such
notice from the Adjudicating Authority.
w w
11. On bare reading of the provisions aforesaid, it is clear that sub-
section (3)(b) of Section 7 and sub-section (3)(b) of Section 10, are
mandatory and the 'Financial Creditor' and the 'Corporate Applicant' are
required to furnish the name of 'Interim Resolution Professional', failing
which application being defective may be rejected.
12. On the other hand on bare perusal of sub-section (4) of Section 9,
it is clear that for the 'Operational Creditor' it is not mandatory to propose
the name of an 'Interim Resolution Professional', in view of the word 'may'
used in sub-section (4) of Section 9, as distinct from word 'shall' used in
sub-section (3) of Section 7 and sub-section (3) of Section 1Q of 'I&B
Code'.
13. Section 16 relates to appointment and tenure of 'Interim Resolution
Professional' which reads as follows: -
"16. Appointment and tenure of interim resolution
professional. --(1) The Adjudicating Authority shall appoint
an interim resolution professional within fourteen days from
the insolvency commencement date.
(2) Where the application for corporate insolvency resolution
process is made by a financial creditor or the corporate
debtor, as the case may be, the resolution professional, as
proposed respectively in the application under section 7 or section 10, shall be appointed as the interim resolution
professional, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending
against him.
(3) Where the application for corporate insolvency resolution
process is made by an operational creditor and--
(a) no proposal for an interim resolution professional is
made, the Adjudicating Authority shall make a reference to
the Board for the recommendation of an insolvency
professional who may act as an interim resolution
professional;
(b) aproposal for an interim resolution professional is made
under sub-section (4) of section 9, the resolution
professional as proposed, shall be appointed as the interim
resolution professional, if no disciplinary proceedings are
pending against him.
(4) The Board shall, within ten days of the receipt of a
reference from the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section
(3), recommend the name of an insolvency professional to
the Adjudicating Authority against whom no disciplinary
proceedings are pending.
(5) The term of the interim resolution professional shall not
exceed thirty days from date of his appointment."
14. From sub-section (2) of Section 16, it is clear that the 'Interim
Resolution Professional', who have been proposed by 'Financial Creditor' 10
and 'Corporate Applicant' under section 7(3)(b) and Section 10(3)(b)
respectively are to be appointed as 'Interim Resolution ProfessiOnal', if no
disciplinary proceedings are pending. On the other hand, Clause (b) of
sub-section (3) of Section 16 makes it is clear that if the name of 'Interim
Resolution Professional' is proposed by 'Operational Creditor' as per sub-
section (4) of Section 9, then only such person is to be appointed, if no
disciplinary proceedings are pending, on the other hand, if no name of
'Interim Resolution Professional' is proposed by an 'Operational Creditor',
the Adjudicating Authority is required to make reference to the Board for
recommendation of an 'Interim Resolution Professional' under sub-
section (1) read with sub-section 3(a) of Section 16 who may act as an
'Insolvency Resolution Professional'.
15. If Section 7(3)(b), Section 9(4) and Section 10(3)(b) are read along
with Section 16, it will be clear that while it is mandatory for 'Financial
Creditor' and 'Corporate Applicant' to propose name of an 'Interim
Resolution Professional', but for 'Operational Creditor' it is not mandatory
and the 'Operational Creditor' may or may not propose the name of an
'Interim Resolution Professional'.
16. In view of the findings aforesaid, while we uphold the decision of
the Adjudicating Authority that proposal of name of 'Interim Resolution
Professional' in terms of clause (b) of sub-section (3) of Section 7 is
mandatory, but in the facts and circumstances of the case, as the name
of 'Interim Resolution Professional' has already been proposed by the
Appellant-'Financial Creditor', the impugned order dated 22nd June, 2017
cannot be upheld.
11
17. Further, we are of the view that if the application filed by 'Financial'
Creditor' or 'Corporate Applicant' is defective in absence of name of an
'Interim Resolution Professional', then in such case in terms of proviso to
Section 7 and Section 10, the Adjudicating Authority is required to give
a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect within seven days of the
receipt of such notice.
18. For the reasons aforesaid, we set aside the impugned order dated
22nd June, 2017 passed in Company Petition No. IB-80(PB)/2017 and
remit the case to the Ld. Adjudicating Authority, Principal Bench, New
Delhi. If the application is otherwise complete, Ld. Adjudicating
Authority will admit the application. However, in case of any defect, the
appellant be provided with seven days' time to remove the
defects/ complete record.
19. The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid observations. However, in
the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to
costs.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Balvinder Singh) Member(Technical) ar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free