Chander Shekhar Arya vs Sameer Vasudev
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 290 of 2025
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An order that dismisses an application without giving any reason is not a speaking order and violates the principle of natural justice; such an order is liable to be set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal to decide the application afresh and pass a reasoned, speaking order, taking into account the pleadings and evidence led by the applicant on the cause of non-appearance.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Chander Shekhar Arya ...Appellant
Versus
Sameer Vasudeva & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Abhijit Mittal, Mr. Anukalp Jain, Ms. Shaivya Singh, Ms. Niharika Sinha, Advocates. For Respondents : Ms. Jaismeen Sharma, Advocate.
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode)
Per: Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Oral)
19.05.2025: This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.01.2025
by which the Ld. Tribunal has dismissed the application of the appellant
bearing Rest.A1/2025 by which the appellant has prayed for restoration of
I.A. No. 520 of 2021 filed in CP (IB)-429(ND)/2019 which was dismissed for
non-prosecution on 26.11.2024.
2. Notice in the appeal was issued and all the six respondents were
served but except Respondent No.3 no one had put in appearance,
therefore, they were proceeded against ex-parte on 15.05.2025. Counsel for
Respondent No. 3 has submitted that she has no objection if the appeal is
allowed and the order dated 08.01.2025 is set aside and the matter is
remanded back.
3. Counsel for the appellant has argued that the Ld. Tribunal has
passed the impugned order without looking into the fact that the non-
Cont'd.../ -2-
appearance of the counsel at the time of hearing in the application on
26.11.2024 was on account of illness which has not been referred to at all
in the impugned order.
4. We have heard the counsel for the parties and after examining the
record are of the considered opinion that the Ld. Tribunal has dismissed
the application of the appellant without giving any reason. Therefore, the
impugned order is not a speaking order and is in violation of the principle
of natural justice.
5. Thus, in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present
appeal is allowed and the order dated 08.01.2025 is set aside The matter is
remanded back to the Ld. Tribunal, seized of the matter to decide
Rest.A1/2025 afresh, after taking into consideration the pleadings and the
evidence led by the appellant in regard to non-appearance on 26.11.2024
and pass a speaking order. The parties are directed to appear before the
Tribunal on 29.05.2025.
[Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial)
[Mr. Naresh Salecha] Member (Technical)
[Mr. Indevar Pandey] Member (Technical) SA/RR
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 290 of 2025
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free