Central Bank Of India Limited vs M D Frozen Food Exports Private Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1878 of 2025
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an affidavit directed by an earlier order has in substance been filed, albeit late, the tribunal must rationally consider it rather than dismiss the proceedings for non-compliance with the time limit, because a litigant before a tribunal is entitled to have its lis decided on the merits.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Central Bank of India ...Appellant
Versus
M.D. Frozen Foods Exports Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Ms. Richa Sandilya, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Jeetender Gupta, Mr. Bhavnesh Kashyap, Advocates.
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode)
11.08.2026: In the proceedings those were held before the Ld. National
Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Court-IV, in CP IB No.480 of 2025. The
Ld. Tribunal vide its order dated 10.10.2025 had rejected the application
preferred by the appellant under Section 7 of I&B Code, on account of the
fact that the appellant has not complied with the earlier order dated
22.09.2025. By virtue of which the Ld. Tribunal had directed the appellant to
place certain affidavit on record.
2. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that, though the order
dated 22.09.2025 was not complied with within the time period prescribed
by the Ld. Tribunal, but actually the affidavit was placed on record on
07.10.2025, and it is because of the non-compliance of the order dated
22.09.2025 within time the proceedings have been dismissed. -2-
3. We are of the view that so far as the purpose of filing of an affidavit by
virtue of an order dated 22.09.2025, this stood satisfied with the appellant
having already filed an affidavit on 07.10.2025 and the affidavit filed thereon
ought to have been rationally considered by the Ld. Tribunal even if filed
with some delay, rather than dismissing the proceedings under Section 7 of
I&B Code on grounds of non-compliance of the order dated 22.09.2025.
4. We are of the view that a litigant before a tribunal is required to have
his lis decided on its merits. Hence, we quash the order and remit the matter
back to the Ld. National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Court-IV, to
decide the proceedings of the company petition on its own merits, leaving all
contentions raised by the respondent to be considered on merits by the
Tribunal.
[Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma] Member (Judicial)
[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical)
[Indevar Pandey] Member (Technical)
SA/rr
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1878 of 2025
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free