Bhavna Sanjay Ruia vs Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 341 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An appeal lies to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 only against an order of the Adjudicating Authority; no appeal is maintainable against an order passed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, including its Disciplinary Committee, and an appeal against such an order is therefore not maintainable before the Tribunal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Bhavna Sanjay Ruia ...Appellant
Vs
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India ....Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Pankaj Jain and Mr. Sagar Bansal, Advocates. For Respondent:
ORDER
08.04.2019: This appeal has been preferred by 'Bhavna Sanjay Ruia'
(Resolution Professional) against order dated 21st February, 2019 passed by
'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India' (IBBI) in Disciplinary Committee of
IBBI.
2. The Section 61 of I&B Code empowers an aggrieved person to file an appeal
before this Appellate Tribunal:-
"61. Appeals and Appellate Authority. - (1)
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the
Companies Act 2013 (18 of 2013), any person aggrieved by
the order of the Adjudicating Authority under this part may
prefer an appeal to the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 341 of 2019 -2-
(2) Every appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed within
thirty days before the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal:
Provided that the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal may allow an appeal to be filed after the expiry of the
said period of thirty days if it is satisfied that there was
sufficient cause for not filing the appeal but such period shall
not exceed fifteen days.
(3) An appeal against an order approving a resolution plan
under section 31 may be filed on the following grounds,
namely:--
(i) the approved resolution plan is in contravention of the
provisions of any law for the time being in force;
(ii) there has been material irregularity in exercise of the
powers by the resolution professional during the
corporate insolvency resolution period;
(iii) the debts owed to operational creditors of the
corporate debtor have not been provided for in the
resolution plan in the manner specified by the Board;
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 341 of 2019 -3-
(iv) the insolvency resolution process costs have not
been provided for repayment in priority to all other
debts; or
(v) the resolution plan does not comply with any other
criteria specified by the Board.
(4) An appeal against a liquidation order passed under
section 33 may be filed on grounds of material irregularity
or fraud committed in relation to such a liquidation order."
3. From the aforesaid provision it will be clear that only against order passed
by the Adjudicating Authority, this Appellate Tribunal can entertain appeal. No
appeal is maintainable against order passed by Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Board of India including its Disciplinary Committee.
4. In the circumstance, the appeal is dismissed being not maintainable.
However, this order will not come in the way of the Appellant to move before
appropriate forum for appropriate relief.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 341 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free