Bhagyanagar Boards & Chemicals Pvt Ltd & ... vs Vijay Kumar Goyal & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) No. 42 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal's modification of the impugned interim order rests on the following reasoning: where compensation received by a party is already held in fixed deposits, the tribunal may direct that those deposits be maintained, renewed with interest from time to time, and not encumbered pending the decision of the company petition, rather than requiring the sum to be placed in a separate account; and the correction of the sum to be so held is made by reference to the amount actually disclosed as remaining in fixed deposits, with the balance adjusted accordingly.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Bhagyanagar Boards & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Appellants Versus Vijay Kumar Goyal & Ors. ...Respondents
For Appellant: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Mr. Abhinav Rao, Ms. Monalisa Kosaria and Mr. Sikhar Singh, Advocates
For Respondent: Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocate (R1-R3)
ORDER
18.02.2020 Heard learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr. Ravi
Raghunath, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, the original Petitioners in the
Company Petition. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are Proforma Respondents, as
arrayed. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1 to 3 has appeared on
his own under instructions from these Respondents. He is also heard.
It is stated that Impugned Order Para 1 shows as to the relief, which was
sought in the IA No. 1103 of 2019 which was filed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
herein. The prayer reads as under:
"a. Direct the Respondents 1 and 3, 5 to 8 to deposit
the compensation amount of Rs. 9,99,18,703/-
(Rupees Nine Crores Ninety-nine Lakhs Eighteen
Thousand Seven Hundred and three only) and
such further or other amounts that may be received
by any of the Respondents from the Greater 2
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation in a separate
Bank Account, to the Credit of the present
proceedings in T.P. No.06/HDB/2016, and to
further direct the Respondents not to alienate or
otherwise encumber the said compensation
amount in any manner whatsoever;"
The Learned Senior Counsel submits that in spite of such prayer the
order passed by the Learned NCLT, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad is as
follows:
"a. In view of the above, the Respondents are hereby
directed to place the amount of Rs. 9,99,18,703/-
received as compensation from the Greater
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation in a separate
Fixed Deposit Account for safe keeping and also
place all the particulars of the amounts and stage
of the application filed by R 1 Company for
enhancement of compensation within two weeks
before this Bench and further serve a copy of the
same to the Applicants."
Learned Counsel states that the amount received as compensation
towards land has already been deposited by the Appellants in Fixed Deposits.
Learned Senior Counsel tenders at bar particulars of the Fixed Deposits which
have been created of the amounts. The document is marked 'X' for
Company Appeal (AT) No. 42 of 2020 3
identification. The Learned Senior Counsel submits that it was stated to the
Learned NCLT that the amounts are kept in safe custody but still such order
to put the amount in separate Escrow Account has been passed. The learned
counsel for the Respondents is stating that the Appellants did not disclose
particulars as to how and where the money is deposited and it is only now
that the particulars of Fixed Deposits are disclosed.
The Appellant has in the Appeal Para 7.44, stated about keeping the
amount of Rs. 9.87 Crores in Fixed Deposits.
It is stated that the Company Petition itself needs to be decided urgently
and that it is kept for final hearing on 4th March, 2020. It is stated that even
written arguments have been filed.
It appears to us that if the amounts have been kept in Fixed Deposits,
the same may continue to be kept in Fixed Deposits and the same should be
renewed with interest from time to time. Learned Counsel for the Respondent
submits that there being disputes between the parties, the Fixed Deposits
should not be encumbered by the Appellants, we find that the request is
reasonable. It would be appropriate that the Company Petition is decided early
for the welfare of the company.
The Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the Appellants had
received Rs. 9,99,18,703/- out of which some amount was utilised for repair
of the walls and the Company which was demolished by the Municipal
Corporation. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that this was
against the orders of the Ld. Company Law Board, copy of which is at
Annexure A-32, which had directed the Appellants to keep the whole amount
in safe custody.
Company Appeal (AT) No. 42 of 2020 4
The Fixed Deposits created are of Rs. 9,87,61,429/-.
For the above reasons, we substitute figure of Rs. 11,57,274/- in the
Impugned Order Para 7, in place of Rs. 9,99,18,703/-, the rest of the amount
which is stated to have been deposited in Fixed Deposits shall be continued
to be maintained in Fixed Deposits as shown in document marked 'X'. The
Appellants would be responsible to renew the Fixed Deposits with interest
from time to time, till decision of the Company Petition. The Appellant will not
encumber the Fixed Deposits in any manner.
The Company Petition be urgently disposed preferably within two
months.
With this modification, the present Appeal stands disposed of.
[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
[Justice A.B. Singh] Member (Judicial)
[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical) BB/md /
Company Appeal (AT) No. 42 of 2020
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free