Bhagwandas R. Bhattad vs R M Bhuther And Company Limited And Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.494 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the principal amount and interest in the default have been paid into court and disbursed to the financial creditor, there is no purpose in continuing the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor, and the appeal against admission of the Section 7 application may be disposed of on that basis, leaving the financial creditor free to pursue any balance due under the consent terms by such proceedings as the law permits.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Bhagwandas R. Bhattad ...Appellant
Versus
R. M. Bhuther and Company Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present:
For Appellant: Mr. P. Nagesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Nanda, Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr. Bharat Kr. Jain, Advocates.
For Respondents: Mr. Shyel Trehan, Mr. Pranav Sarthi, Ms. Shivalika, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Dyutz Ghai, Advocate for R-1
ORDER
18.05.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
This appeal has been filed against the order dated 03.03.2023 by which
Adjudicating Authority has admitted Section 7 application on IA No. 1621/2023.
Section 7 application was filed by the Financial Creditor for default of an amount
of Rs. 1,15,88,470/-.
2. In Section 7 proceedings, a Consent Terms was entered between the
parties on 30.06.2021 under which the parties settled their issues and certain
payments were required to be made by the Corporate Debtor. There was breach
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.494 of 2023 1 in the Consent Terms hence, an IA was filed to revive the Section 7 application
which has been revived by the order dated 14.02.2023. After the revival of the
application by the Impugned Order, Section 7 application has been admitted.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that when the Appeal was
taken up, this Court has passed an order on 21.04.2023 to deposit the Appellant
an amount of Rs. 1,71,80,263/- which according to the Appellant has already
been deposited.
4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in view of the fact that
entire Principal Amount has been deposited +interest, there is no purpose for
continuing the CIRP any further.
5. Learned Counsel for Respondent refuting the submissions contends that
since the Consent Terms were breached by the Corporate Debtor, the
Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in admitting Section 7
application.
6. It is submitted by the Learned Counsel for Respondent that amount of Rs.
2,27,26,425/- is due on the Corporate Debtor as per Consent Terms which
statement disputed by the Appellant.
We have considered the submission of the parties and perused the record.
7. The amount under part-IV of the Section 7 application is to the following
effect:-
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.494 of 2023 2 Amount claimed to be in Amount claimed to be in default:
default and the date on which The Principal Amount of Rs.
the default occurred (Attach 1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore
the workings for computation only), Interest of Rs. 9,23,334/-
of amount and days of default (Rupees Nine Lakhs Twenty Three
in tabular form) Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty
Four only), Financial Loan (ICD)
Processing and Sanction Charges and
Out of Pocket Expenses of Rs.
6,65,136/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Sixty
Five Thousand One Hundred and
Thirty Six only) aggregating to Amount
Outstanding of Rs. 1,15,88,470/-
(Rupees One Crore Fifteen Lakhs
Eighty Eight Thousand Four Hundred
and Seventy only)."
8. It is to be noted that in view of the Consent Terms between the
parties, the Appellant has deposited in the Court, the amount of Rs.
1,71,80,263/- as noted above.
9. We are of the view that in the ends of justice be served in directing that
the said amount deposited in the court is paid to the Financial Creditor. The
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.494 of 2023 3 Principal Amount + Interest having been paid, we see no purpose in continuing
the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. In so far as the submission of the
Learned Counsel for the Financial Creditor that Consent Terms, the entire
amount of Consent Terms has not been paid, the Financial Creditor is at liberty
to take such proceedings as permissible in law to recover the balance amount.
With these observations we dispose of the Appeal.
10. Learned Counsel for IRP submits that IRP fee and expenses has not yet
been paid.
11. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submit that Appellant shall make the
payment and expenses subject to submission of the bills along with necessary
receipts etc. The amount shall be paid within two weeks thereafter.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Mr. Naresh Salecha] Member (Technical)
ss/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.494 of 2023 4
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free