Bajrang Lal Dalmia Huf vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 349 of 2024
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal condoned a delay of 743 days on payment of costs, reasoning that the appellant was prepared to pay them and the condonation was just and reasonable in the circumstances; the appeal was then dismissed because the appellant's purpose of availing the settlement scheme could be achieved before SEBI without the appeal remaining pending, and SEBI's undertaking to consider such claims under the scheme, if filed in time, made continuance of the appeal unnecessary.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision: 10.06.2024
Misc. Application No. 698 of 2024 And Appeal No. 349 of 2024
Bajrang Lal Dalmia HUF Lalji Tola Eastern Side, Patna, Bihar- 800 001 ...Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400 051 ...Respondent
Ms. Shreya Khandelwal, Advocate i/b Juris Link for the Appellant.
--
Mr. Manish Chhangani, Advocate with Mr. Sumit Yadav, Mr. Abhay Chauhan and Mr. Atul Kumar Agrawal and Mr. D Kalyan Reddy, Advocates i/b The Law Point for the Respondent
-SEBI.
CORAM: Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar, Technical Member
Per: Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer (Oral)
Not on Board. Mentioned today by the appellant.
2. There is a delay of 743 days in the filing of the appeal. 2
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that SEBI has
come out with the Settlement Scheme, 2024 and appellant
desires to avail the same. With regard to delay in filing this
appeal, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the
same may be allowed by imposing reasonable costs and on
instructions, submitted that appellant is prepared to pay a cost of
Rs. 25,000/-. We find it just and reasonable. In the
circumstances, application for condonation of delay is allowed
subject to payment of Rs. 25,000/- as costs to SEBI. Appellant
has approached this Tribunal to avail the settlement scheme. In
similar cases, SEBI has undertaken to consider the cases under
the settlement scheme. Hence, no purpose would be served by
keeping this appeal pending. Shri Manish Chhangani, Counsel
for SEBI submits that notwithstanding dismissal of this appeal,
SEBI shall consider appellant's case under Settlement Scheme
if it is filed in time. His submission is placed on record.
4. In the result, Misc. Application for condonation of delay is
allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 25,000/-. Appeal is
dismissed. SEBI shall consider the appellant's case under the
Settlement Scheme if claim is filed in time. 3
5. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the
scheme is expiring today. The registry shall endeavor to upload
this order during the course of the day. However,
notwithstanding the same, SEBI is directed to consider
appellants case for settlement and we request Shri Manish
Chhangani, learned counsel for the respondent SEBI to convey
this order to the SEBI.
Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member
Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar PRERNA Digitally signed Technical Member by PRERNA 10.06.2024 MANISH MANISH KHARE PK KHARE Date: 2024.06.14 10:38:01 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free