B.Karthikeyan vs Nonstop Courier And Cargo Pvt Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 476 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A person who has paid money to a corporate debtor solely to obtain franchisee rights, and who has neither supplied goods nor rendered services to it, is not an "operational creditor" within the meaning of Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and an application under Section 9 by such a person is not maintainable.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
B. Karthikeyan ...Appellant
Versus
Nonstop Courier & Cargo Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Mr. S. Ramajayam, Advocate
ORDER
03.05.2019 The Appellant filed an application u/s 9 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, the 'I&B Code') against 'M/s. Nonstop Courier
and Cargo Private Limited' which has been rejected by order dated 14th March,
2019 by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Division
Bench, Chennai. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits
that the respondent failed to refund the deposit amount of Rs. 2.50 Lakhs
deposited by the Appellant with the 'Corporate Debtor'. It is submitted that the
aforesaid amount of Rs. 2.50 Lakhs deposited to get franchisee rights over
Alwarpet and T. Nagar branches of 'M/s. Nonstop Courier and Cargo Private
Limited'.
2. From the aforesaid submission, it is clear that the Appellant has neither
supplied any goods nor provided any services and it has only deposited money
for Franchisee rights and as such it cannot be termed as 'Operational Creditor'
in terms of Section 9 of the I&B Code. In view of the matter the application
under Section 9 being not maintainable, we are not inclined to interfere with the 2
impugned order dated 14th March, 2019. However, we are not expressing any
opinion as to whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Appellant
can claim to be a 'Financial Creditor' for initiation of proceeding u/s 7 of the I&B
Code.
The appeal is dismissed with aforesaid observations.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical)
/ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 476 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free