Avr Overseas Private Limited vs Adinath Internationalnprivate ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1016 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a party has filed its reply and rejoinder has been filed and costs paid, and the reply is said to have been filed in physical form, the Adjudicating Authority ought to have given the party an opportunity to file its reply before proceeding ex parte, and an ex parte order and the order refusing to set it aside are to be set aside in such circumstances in the interest of justice, with the reply directed to be taken on record.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
AVR Overseas Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant Versus Adinath International Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent Present: For Appellant: Mr. Karan Khanna, Advocate. For Respondent: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Advocate. ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
09.12.2021: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as Learned
Counsel appearing for the Respondent. With the consent of the parties the
Appeal is being taken up for final disposal.
2. This appeal has been filed by the Appellant against order dated 11.10.2021
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) New
Delhi, Court IV in I.A. No. 4579/ND/2021 in (IB) 348(ND)2020. An application
was filed by the Corporate Debtor to set aside the ex-parte order dated
18.08.2021, the said Application has been rejected.
3. In the present case, the CIRP proceedings were initiated and time was
granted to the Respondent, who is Appellant before us, to file its reply. On 2nd
February, 2021, the Adjudicating Authority passed following order:
"Order None appears for the Corporate Debtor. On 05.01.2021, 2 weeks' time was granted to file reply. Neither reply is filed, nor anybody is appearing. As a last chance 5 days'
Cont'd..../ -2-
time is granted to file reply subject to the cost of Rs.10,000 to be paid to the Applicant. List the matter on 10.03.2021."
4. On 10.03.2021 again, the case was taken up and the court noticed that no
reply has yet been filed. It was informed that the main counsel met with an
accident, hence there was delay. It was noted that reply was served on the other
side one day before. Learned counsel for the Corporate Debtor submitted that
reply has been filed and he undertook that cost will be paid during the course of
the day. Court also granted time to file the rejoinder. Learned Counsel for the
Appellant submits that reply was filed on 09.03.2021 on which dated it was also
served upon the Counsel for the other side.
5. Matter was again taken up by the Court on 18.08.2021 on which date the
Court noticed that on the perusal of e-portal, the reply has not come on record.
The Court also noticed that copy of rejoinder is on record. None appeared on
behalf of the Corporate Debtor. It was also noticed that cost is paid but reply has
not come on record. The court directed to proceed ex-parte, which order was
sought to be recalled by filing the I.A. but was refused.
6. The Adjudicating Authority had refused to set aside the order dated
18.08.2021. Statement was also made before the Court that the reply was filed
in the physical form also. Court, however, observed that the status of reply on
e-portal shows awaited. On the above reasoning, the application was rejected.
7. Learned Counsel for the Applicant (Respondent before us) does not dispute
that he has received the reply on which he has also filed the rejoinder and he has
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1016 of 2021 -3-
also received the cost. Learned Counsel for the Appellant made statement that
reply was filed in the physical form also. Even if, the reply in physical form was
not available, an opportunity ought to have been given to the file reply before the
court.
8. We are satisfied that present is the case in which rejoinder having been
filed by the Applicant and cost being paid to the Applicant/ Respondent before
us, the Court ought to have given opportunity to the Respondent/Appellant
before us to file reply. In the facts of the present case, ends of justice be served
in setting aside order dated 18.08.2021 as well as order dated 11.10.2021. We,
however, direct Learned Counsel for the Appellant to file reply in physical form
before the Adjudicating Authority alongwith copy of this order within two weeks,
which may be taken on record and the Learned Adjudicating Authority shall
proceed to hear the matter further in accordance with law. With these
observations, Appeal stands disposed off.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Justice Jarat Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial)
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) Archana/nn.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1016 of 2021
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free