Athena Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd vs Tanvi Construction Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 313 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 may not be rejected on the technical ground that the Board resolution accompanying it was defective in form, where the application was filed after the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notification of 24th February, 2019 and the Adjudicating Authority has not decided the disputed question of the resolution's validity. Where the Adjudicating Authority rejects a Section 7 application on such a technical ground, the order is liable to be set aside and the matter remitted to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision after notice to the Corporate Debtor, without going into the technicality.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Athena Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant
Vs
Tanvi Construction Pvt. Ltd. .... Respondent
Present:
For Appellant: Mr. Kunal Tandon, Mr. Darryl Pereira, Mr. Mayank, Ms. Niti Jain and Ms. Richa Sandilya, Advocates.
For Respondent: Mr. Armin Wandrewala, Mr. Akshay Vani, Mr. Manan Jaiswal and Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Advocates.
ORDER
01.05.2019 The Appellant - Athena Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd. filed
application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(I&B Code), which having been rejected by order dated 12th March, 2019
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Mumbai Bench, the present Appeal has been preferred.
2. The application under Section 7 has been rejected on technical ground
that the application under Section 7 filed by the Director on the basis of
Board's Resolution was not proper, though time was allowed to the Appellant.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 313 of 2019 Page 1 of 3
3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent submits that
the Appellant was given an opportunity to file the proper Resolution of the
meeting of the Board of Directors, but it was not produced within time, but
the same was subsequently corrected. However, we are not going to decide
such disputed question, but merely on such technicality an application
under Section 7 cannot be rejected, particularly in view of Notification dated
27th February, 2019 passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, which reads
as follows: -
4. The impugned order dated 12th March, 2019 having been passed after
the Notification dated 24th February, 2019, we are of the view that the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 313 of 2019 Page 2 of 3 Adjudicating Authority should have entertained the application under
Section 7 of the I&B Code.
5. For the reasons aforesaid, we set-aside the impugned order dated 12th
March, 2019 and remit the case to the Adjudicating Authority for passing
appropriate order after notice to the Corporate Debtor without going into
such technicality. It will be open to the Corporate Debtor to settle the matter
in the meantime.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)
Ash/GC
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 313 of 2019 Page 3 of 3
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free