Atharva Auto Logistics Pvt Ltd vs Intec Capital Limited & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 303 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed on the footing of a stated date of default that is more than three years old, the application is not barred by limitation if the financial creditor's documents on record show a later payment by the corporate debtor, since limitation runs for three years from the date of the last payment acknowledged in the record. The payment details, having been placed on record with the application and noticed by the Adjudicating Authority, are to be taken into account in determining whether the application is within time.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 303 of 2022 IN THE MATTER OF: Atharva Auto Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus Intec Capital Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Sangramsingh Bhonsle, Ms. Samridhi Jain, Nrupal Dingankar and Mr. Satyam Tripathi, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Amir Arsiwala, Mr. Piyush Deshpande, Mr. Aabhas Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Akshay Petkar, Mr. Ayush Negi, Advocates for R-2. ORDER
(Virtual Mode) 24.03.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Learned Counsel for
the Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 are also present.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 18th February, 2022
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Court-
5, Mumbai Bench) in CP No. 1258/MB/I&B/2020. By which Order, Application
being CP No. 1258/MB/I&B/2020 filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC in short) by the Respondent No. 1 has been
admitted as well within time.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that in Part-IV of the Section
7 Application, the 'Date of Default' was mentioned as 25th August, 2017 and from
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 303 of 2022 2
25th August, 2017, the Application was barred by time since it was filed on 28th
August, 2020. He further submitted that Adjudicating Authority even after
noticing the aforesaid fact has not adverted to and held that Application is not
barred by time.
4. We have considered the submissions of Learned Counsel for the Parties
and perused the record.
5. The Adjudicating Authority in Paragraph 6 of the Order has made following
observations:
"6. The Petitioner has also filed record of default by the information utility (NESL). The statement of account produced by the Petitioner shows that the last repayment of Rs. 2 Lakhs was made by the Corporate Debtor on 31.07.2018."
6. When the last payment was made on 31st July, 2018, the Application filed
on 28th August, 2020 was well within three years from the last payment. The
submission of the Appellant that Application was barred by time cannot be
accepted. The payment details regarding the payment was already the part of the
Application which has been brought on record along with the Application and
from such details regarding the payment when the Adjudicating Authority has
noticed the submissions that last payment was made on 31st July, 2018, the
Application cannot be said to be barred by time. The default and debt were
proved, on that basis the Application was admitted. We do not agree with the
submissions of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant that Application was
barred by time.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 303 of 2022 3
7. Learned Counsel for the Appellant has placed reliance on a Judgment of
Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2020 (15) SCC 1 in the matter of 'Babulal
Vardharji Gurjar Vs. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.' and
submitted that Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the date of default has to be
ascertained on the basis of pleadings in Section 7 Application of the IBC. In the
present case, Part-IV of the Section 7 Application of the IBC, 'Date of Default' is
dated 25th August, 2017 there is no dispute regarding that but along with the
Application the relevant documents including ledger account of the payment
were also brought on record where the last payment made by the Corporate
Debtor has been mentioned on 31.07.2018 and the same has been noticed by
the Adjudicating Authority. In view of the last payment made on 31.07.2018 as
noted above, the Application was well within time and the Financial Creditor
entitled for taking benefit of 3 years period of limitation from the date of last
payment. The Judgment relied on by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant does
not come to any aid to the Appellant in the present case.
In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any merit in the Appeal, the Appeal
is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical)
[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical) Basant/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 303 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free