Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ... vs Gpt Steel Industries Ltd

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal15 February 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not a recovery proceeding, and the Adjudicating Authority must adhere strictly to the procedure and timelines prescribed by the Code when considering an application under Section 7, confining pre-admission proceedings to a limited enquiry and not permitting them to be converted into a full-dressed trial or to be protracted by repeated adjournments.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 151 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. ...Appellant

Vs

GPT Steel Industries Ltd. ....Respondent

Present: For Appellant: Mr. Dinkar Singh, Advocate. For Respondent:

ORDER

15.02.2019: Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that application of Appellant - Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the I&B Code is pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad at the pre-admission stage since 1st March, 2018 and the matter has been adjourned time and again.

2. From the perusal of impugned order it appears that both the parties are represented before the Adjudicating Authority and the matter has been adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the Respondent- Corporate Debtor to 18th February, 2019.

3. I am dismayed to notice that a limited enquiry has been converted into a full dressed trial. Pre-admission proceedings cannot be permitted to protract. This Appellate Tribunal has observed in a recent judgment that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is not a recovery proceeding and the Adjudicating Authority has to strictly adhere to the rules of procedure and the timelines set out in the I&B Code. The Adjudicating Authority should be alive to the object sought to be achieved by the I&B Code and ensure that all efforts to derail the process are frustrated.

-2- 4. After hearing learned counsel for Appellant for a while I am of the opinion that this appeal can be disposed of at the very threshold stage by directing the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench Ahmedabad to expedite the disposal of application under Section 7 of the I&B Code and pass an appropriate order preferably within two weeks failing which this Appellate Tribunal may send for the record of Adjudicating Authority and pass appropriate order.

5. A copy of this order be provided to learned counsel for the Appellant for placing the same before the Adjudicating Authority.

6. The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions.

[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial) am/sk

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 151 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free