Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ... vs Corporation Ltd. & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 418 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
No party has a right to dictate whether the Adjudicating Authority must undertake a further valuation before deciding on a resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors; it is within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion, in considering whether to approve the plan under Section 31 of the I&B Code, to satisfy itself of the plan and, where it considers fit, to call for fresh valuation.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. ....Appellant
Vs.
Corporation Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents
Present: Appellant: Mr. Pranav Vyas and Mr. Shashank Agarwal, Advocates. Respondents: Mr. Alok Kumar, Ms. Somya Yadava and Mr. Ketul Hansraj, Advocates for R-1
ORDER
13.03.2020: From the record we find that in the Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process against 'Unimark Remedies Limited' (Corporate Debtor) the
resolution plan submitted by the Appellant - 'Asset Reconstruction Company
(India) Ltd.' has been approved by the Committee of Creditors. However, the
matter is pending since long and the Adjudicating Authority (National Company
Law Tribunal), Court No. 5, Mumbai Bench has not passed any order under
Section 31 of the I&B Code approving or rejecting the resolution plan, as it has
already called for fresh valuation.
2. The Appellant has challenged the decision for fresh valuation as made by
the Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 20th January, 2020 on the ground
that it is not permissible.
3. Having heard Mr. Pranav Vyas, learned counsel for the Appellant and
Mr. Alok Kumar, learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 - Corporation Bank
(applicant who asked for fresh valuation), we are not inclined to interfere with -2-
the impugned order as no party has a right to say whether the Adjudicating
Authority should go for further valuation before approval of the plan or not and
it is open to the Adjudicating Authority to satisfy itself of the plan approved by
the Committee of Creditors, to ascertain whether to approve the plan under
Section 31 of the I&B Code or not. As the matter is pending since long, we hope
that the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai
Bench will pass appropriate order under Section 31 in the application taking into
consideration the valuation and the plan as approved by the Committee of
Creditors. The delay of 12 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. The appeal
stands disposed of with aforesaid observation.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
[Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 418 of 2020
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free