Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Assam Company India Limited vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal21 August 2017J.P. Devadhar

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Securities and Exchange Board of India cannot, without any investigation and without hearing the company concerned, rest an ex parte order classifying a company as a suspected shell company and moving its securities to Stage VI of the Graded Surveillance Measure solely on the strength of a communication received from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs; such an order is open to stay where the company's annual turnover over the preceding three years, as shown by documents placed before the Tribunal, prima facie appears to contradict the basis of the classification. Where an order of this kind has been stayed, the Tribunal may direct the stock exchanges to reverse their implementing decision expeditiously, and the affected company retains the right to make a representation to SEBI, which SEBI must dispose of in accordance with law; the stay does not preclude SEBI or the stock exchanges from investigating the company and initiating proceedings if they deem fit.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

Date of Decision : 21.08.2017

Appeal No. 196 of 2017

Assam Company India Limited Greenwood Tea Estate, P.O., Dibrugarh, Assam. ...Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...Respondent

Mr. Mustafa Doctor, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sairam Subramanian, Mr. Vaisakh Shaji, and Mr. Akash Karmarkar, Advocates i/b Khaitan & Co. for the Appellant.

Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate with Mr. Vivek Shah, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member

Per : J.P. Devadhar (Oral)

1.

Without conducting any investigation and without hearing the

appellant, whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI" for

short), solely based on the letter dated 09.06.2017 received from the

Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), is justified in passing the ex-parte

order on 07.08.2017 and directing the stock exchanges to treat, inter alia, the

appellant company as a 'suspected shell company' and suspend the daily

trading in the securities of the appellant company on the stock exchanges by

moving the securities of the appellant company to Stage VI of Graded

Surveillance Measure ("GSM" for short) is the question raised in this

appeal.

2

2. Similar question was raised in the case of J. Kumar Infraprojects Ltd.

(Appeal No. 174 of 2017) and by our order dated 10.08.2017 we have

stayed direction 1(a) & (b) contained in the impugned communication of

SEBI dated 07.08.2017 qua the appellant therein.

3. In view of the facts set out in the Memorandum of Appeal and other

documents tendered at the time of hearing relating to annual turnover of the

appellant company for last three years, which even according to SEBI prima

facie appear to be correct, we extend the said stay to the case of the

appellant company herein and direct the stock exchanges to reverse their

decision in respect of the appellant company as expeditiously as possible.

4. Appellant company is at liberty to make a representation to SEBI

against the impugned communication of SEBI dated 07.08.2017. If

representation is made, SEBI shall dispose of the said representation in

accordance with law.

5. It is made clear that this order shall not come in the way of SEBI as

well as the stock exchanges to investigate the case of the appellant company

and initiate proceedings if deemed fit.

6. Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member

21.08.2017 Prepared and compared by:

msb

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free