Asomi Industries Pvt. Ltd vs Sashi Kumar Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) No. 152 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a Board of Directors is reconstituted by the restoration of directors who were wrongfully removed, the Board meetings held in the absence of those restored directors are illegal, and resolutions passed at them are liable to be set aside as acts of mismanagement. Where the setting aside of such Board meetings and the actions taken under them would prejudice the company's interests, including the payment of wages and statutory dues to employees and workmen and the making of fixed deposits, the Tribunal should save the consequences of those meetings, so that actions taken pursuant to them before the restoration of the directors remain valid.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 152 of 2017
IN THE MATTER OF:
Asomi Industries Pvt. Ltd. .Appellant Vs Sashi Kumar Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Respondents
Present: For Appellant:- Mr. R.Jawahar Lal, Mr. Shyamal Anand and Ms. Naina Duggal, Advocates.
For Respondents:-
ORDER
30.05.2017- The Appellant has challenged the order dated 3rd
March, 2017 passed by National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter
referred to as "Tribunal"), Guwahati Bench, Guwahati in T.P.No.
19/397/398/GB/2016inC.P.No. 182 of 2014, whereby and whereunder
the Tribunal on hearing the Ld. Counsels for the parties and perusal of
the records held the removal of Respondent Nos.5 & 6 (Petitioner Nos. 1
& 2 before the Tribunal) were illegal under the resolution adopted on 19th
September, 2014, which itself is an act of mismanagement. While holding
so the Tribunal set aside the resolution dated 19th September, 2014 and
restored the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 (Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 before the
Tribunal) as Directors of the 1st Respondent Company and also held the
subsequent Board Meetings and action(s), if any, taken there-under, save
and except, the allotment of equity shares to the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5
made on 26th September 2014, in pursuance to the resolution dated 13th
September, 2014 as void and illegal and quashed the same. -2-
Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant while contended
that the Appellant has no objection with regard to the restoration of
Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 (Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 before the Tribunal) as
Directors, contended that the Tribunal ought not have set aside the
subsequent Board Meetings and its actions. According to the Ld. Counsel
for the Appellant, in the subsequent Board Meetings various decisions
were taken in relation to payment of salary and wages to the workmen,
statutory dues, dues which were payable to the concerned parties and
fixed deposits of certain amount, but in view of the impugned order they
will stand annulled. According to him, it will not only affect the
employees and workmen in some cases statutory authorities may be
affected.
In spite of notice and its service, the respondents have not
appeared to oppose the appeal.
Having heard the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant and on perusal of
the impugned order, we find no illegality in declaring the subsequent
Board Meetings illegal the subsequent Board Meetings were held in
absence of the Respondent Nos.5 & 6 (Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2) who have
been restored as directors. However, taking into consideration the fact
that various actions were taken pursuant to the Boards' Meeting held
subsequent to 19th September, 2014 and before restoration of
Respondent Nos.5 & 6 as directors, including the wages paid to the
employees, workmen and statutory dues were paid and fixed deposits
have been made by the company, we are of the view that in the interest -3-
of the company the Tribunal should have saved the consequences effect
of holding the subsequent Boards' meetings. In the circumstances, we
modify the part of the impugned order dated 3rd March, 2017 passed by
Tribunal in CP No. 182/2014 by saving all the actions taken by the
company pursuant to Board Meetings held after 19th September, 2014 till
the date of the impugned judgment, which relates to employees-
workmen, payment of wages, payment of dues, fixed deposits etc.
The impugned order dated 3rd March, 2017 passed by Tribunal is
modified to the extent above. The appeal stands disposed of with
aforesaid observations and directions. However, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Mr. Balvinder Singh) Member(Technical) Ar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free