Asl Enterprises Ltd vs Adi Ispat Pvt Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1294 of 2024
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An order of the Adjudicating Authority passed without hearing a party who was not before it when the matter was reserved, and without regard to an earlier subsisting order between the same parties on the same subject, is liable to be set aside on that ground alone.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: ASL Enterprises Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present:
For Appellant : Mr. A.K. Shrivastava, Mr. akash Sharma and Mr. Rishav Ranjan, Advocates
For Respondent : Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, Mr. Parthvi Ahuja and Mr. Prapti Singh, Advocates for Liquidator.
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode)
02.09.2024 Heard Counsel for the Appellant and Learned Counsel for
the Liquidator Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi.
This Appal has been filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating
Authority dated 18.06.2024 in I.A. (IBC) (Dis) No.1687/KB/2023 filed by the
Liquidator.
The brief facts of the case are that in the liquidation proceeding of the
Corporate Debtor, the Appellant was declared as Successful bidder in
response to the public announcement dated 29.09.2022 issued by the
Liquidator. After the Appellant was declared as Successful bidder an I.A. was
filed by the Appellant being I.A. No.240/KB/2024 praying for reliefs and
concession, the said I.A. was allowed by order dated 10.05.2024 passed by
the Adjudicating Authority granting various reliefs and concessions. Copy of
the order has been brought on the record at page 164 of the Appeal at
Annexure A-3.
It appears that Liquidator has filed the I.A. for dissolution of the
Corporate Debtor being I.A. No.1687/KB/2023. It is submitted that the
Appellant has deposited the entire sale consideration and the possession
letter was also issued by the Liquidator on 04.02.2023 and sale agreement
was executed on 20.03.2023. The order on the application for dissolution was
reserved by the Adjudicating Authority on 04.01.2024 which was allowed by
the Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order dated 18.06.2024. The
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in the application filed by
dissolution, the Appellant was not made a party and Appellant was not heard
when the Adjudicating Authority allowed the dissolution. It is submitted that
Appellants could not bring into notice of the Adjudicating Authority of the
earlier order dated 10.05.2024 by which order several reliefs and concession
were granted and the order dated 18.06.2024 was passed in ignorance of the
order dated 10.05.2024 which needs to be set aside.
Learned Counsel for the Liquidator submitted that the sale was not as
going concern sale and it was a sale of assets. The Learned Counsel for the
Liquidator has referred to the reply, which has been filed by the Liquidator in
the present appeal, he has referred to the sale notice dated 20.10.2022 which
accorded to the Appellant was sale as 'as is what is basis, whatever there is
basis and no recourse basis''.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that Liquidator has also
filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority for recall of the order
dated 10.05.2024, which is pending for consideration and listed for
04.09.2024.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 1596 & 1297 of 2024 2 of 3 We have heard the Learned Counsel for the parties, and perused the
record.
From the facts which have been brought on record, it does appear that
the Adjudicating Authority has passed the impugned order dated 18.06.2024
in ignorance of the earlier order dated 10.05.2024. Appellant being not before
the Adjudicating Authority at the time of reserving the order on dissolution
Application, the facts could not be noticed by the Adjudicating Authority. The
Adjudicating Authority have already granted reliefs and concession by order
dated 10.05.2024, the order impugned is passed ignorance of the order dated
10.05.2024, which order deserves to be set aside on this ground alone. We
thus, allow the Appeal. Set aside the order dated 18.06.2024.
The application for recall of order dated 10.05.2024 is still pending
before the Adjudicating Authority. We direct that application for dissolution
be also be listed before the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority
may pass an order after hearing both the parties.
The Appeal is disposed of.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) pks/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 1596 & 1297 of 2024 3 of 3
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free