Ashok Kumar Malhotra, New Delhi vs Assessee
- CitationI.T.A.No.1095/Del/2013
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal may treat an appeal as un-admitted and dismiss it in limine where the assessee, having sought adjournments, fails without any request to appear at the hearing and shows no interest in prosecuting the appeal; mere issue of notice does not by itself amount to admission of the appeal, and the absence of a need or desire to prosecute is a reason the Tribunal may consider in dismissing for non-prosecution.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
The above appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of
CIT(A)-XXVIII, New Delhi dated 12.12.2012 pertaining to AY 2009-10.
2. This appeal was initially fixed for hearing on 2.1.2014 but was adjourned
to 2.6.2014 at the request of the assessee and later fixed for hearing on
23.2.2015 and both parties were informed. Today on 23.2.2015, no one was present on behalf of the assessee nor any request for adjournment was placed
before the Bench.
3. It appears that the assessee is not interested in getting the appeal
prosecuted. Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Tukojirao
Holkar Vs CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), while dismissing the reference made at
the instance of the assessee in default, made the following observations:-
"If the party at whose instance, the reference is made, fails to appear at the hearing or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference."
4. ITAT Delhi Bench 'D' in the case of CIT vs Multiplan India (P) Ltd.
38 ITD 320 observed that the provisions of Rule 19 state that mere issue of
notice could not by itself mean that the appeal had been admitted. This rule
only clarifies the position. There might be various reasons with the appellant to
remain absent at the time of hearing. One of the reasons might also be a desire
or absence of need to prosecute the appeal or liability to assist the Tribunal in a
proper manner or to take benefit of vagaries of law.
5. Respectfully following the precedents, the appeal filed by the assessee is
treated as un-admitted and dismissed in limine. We may like to clarify that
subsequently, if the assessee explains the reasons for non-appearance and if the
Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication
of the appeal.
6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Order pronounced in the open court on 02/03/2015.
Sd/- Sd/-
(N.K. SAINI) (CHANDRAMOHAN GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
DT. 2nd MARCH 2015 'GS'
Copy forwarded to:-
1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. C.I.T.(A) 4. C.I.T. 5. DR
By Order
Asstt.Registrar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free