Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Ashok Kriplani vs Itender Pal Singh

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal10 February 2023Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A contempt proceeding cannot be founded on an order that records no direction or undertaking capable of breach; where a prior order merely notes a party's submission that payments will be made and lists the matter for a later date, there is no mandate of the court whose non-observance could constitute contempt, and the application must be dismissed.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHIContempt Case (AT) No. 10 of 2023 inCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 488 of 2022IN THE MATTER OF:

Ashok Kriplani Resolution Professional of Nibula Print & Pack Pvt. Ltd. ...Applicant

Versus

Itenderpal Singh & Anr. ...Respondents

Present: For Applicant: Ms. Shweta Mahajan, Advocate.

For Respondents: Mr. P. Nagesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shivam Shukla, Ms. Geetika Sharma and Mr. Prabhav Vir, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Ahsan Ahmad and Mr. Rachit Ranjan, Advocates for R-2.

ORDER

10.02.2023: This application has been filed for initiating contempt

proceeding against the Respondents for violating order of this Tribunal passed

on 28.11.2022. Order dated 28.11.2022 read as follows:

"O R D E R

28.11.2022: Resolution Professional appearing in person submits that instalments are being paid irregularly. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that amounts will be paid this month.

List this Appeal on 10th February, 2023."

Cont'd.../ 2

2. By order dated 28.11.2022, this Tribunal did not issue any direction

breach of which can be alleged nor any undertaking has been recorded.

3. We are of the view that contempt proceeding cannot be initiated.

Contempt Application is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Archana/nn

Contempt Case (AT) No. 10 of 2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 488 of 2022

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free