Arihant India Limited vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.149 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The penalty order and recovery notice are set aside because the penalty was passed against the appellant, but the notices were inadvertently sent to the address of a Kolkata company; a recovery notice founded on a penalty order not served on the person against whom it runs cannot stand, and the authority must afresh pass an order after affording the appellant an opportunity of hearing.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Date of Decision: 01/06/2018
Appeal No.149 of 2018
Arihant India Limited C/o. Khairatilal & Sons, 80, Janpath, New Delhi - 110 001. ... Appellant
Versus
1.
The Adjudicating Officer, SEBI, E.R.O., Kolkata.
Eastern Regional Office, L&T Chamber, 16, Camac Street, Kolkata - 700 017.
2. The Recovery Officer & Dy. General Manager, SEBI, E.R.O. Kolkata.
Eastern Regional Office, L&T Chamber, 16, Camac Street, Kolkata - 700 017. ... Respondents
Ms. Ishita Merchant a/w Ms. Akshaya Puthran, Advocates i/b S.K. Sanghi & Co. for the Appellant.
Mr. Chirag Bhavsar, Advocate i/b MDP & Partners for Respondents.
CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member
Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1. This appeal is basically filed to challenge the recovery notice
issued by the Recovery Officer of Securities and Exchange Board of
India ("SEBI" for short) on 8th March, 2018. 2
2. Appellant contends that the penalty order passed by the
Adjudicating Officer ("AO" for short) of SEBI is in respect of a company
situated at Kolkata whereas the impugned recovery notice is issued by
the Recovery Officer of SEBI against the appellant situated at New
Delhi.
3. Counsel for SEBI states that the penalty order was in fact passed
against the appellant, however, inadvertently notices were sent to the
address of a company situated in Kolkata.
4. In these circumstances, we set aside the penalty order dated 12th
August, 2014 and also the impugned recovery notice dated 8th March,
2018 and direct SEBI to pass fresh order in accordance with law after
giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant.
5. Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to
costs.
Sd/-
Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member 01/06/2018 prepared & compared by-dg
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free