Apramey Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Registrar Of Companies & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) No. 341 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal will not interfere with a penalty that has been reduced to one-fifth of the statutory maximum and is found proportionate to the level of statutory non-compliance and other contraventions; a prayer for imposition of a "notional penalty" is therefore rejected. An arithmetical error in computing a penalty imposed by the Tribunal is open to correction by the Tribunal on a rectification application, without any interference on the merits of the penalty, provided the application is made within the time fixed by the order.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Abhi-Asmi International Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Appellants
Vs
Registrar of Companies & Anr. ....Respondents
With
Company Appeal (AT) No. 342 of 2019
IN THE MATTER OF:
Apramey Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Appellants
Vs
Registrar of Companies & Anr. ....Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Present but appearance not marked. For Respondent:
ORDER
21.11.2019: After hearing learned counsel for the Appellants for a while
we are of the considered opinion that having regard to the circumstances
brought to the notice of the National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench,
New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') warranting remission in penalty
and culminating in imposing only 1/5th of the maximum penalty prescribed by
the statute as compounded penalty which was proportionate to the level of
contravention in the form of statutory non-compliance and other
contraventions attracting penalty, there is no scope for intervention in this
appeal. Prayer for imposition of 'notional penalty' is accordingly rejected. -2-
2. However, without interfering on the merit, we take notice of the
submission made on behalf of the Appellants that in computing the amount of
penalty levied upon the Appellants, the Tribunal has erred in calculating it
properly. If it be so, the Appellants shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal
for seeking rectification. Any mathematical error in computing the penalty
imposed can be corrected by the Tribunal provided the Appellants approach
the Tribunal within one week of passing of this order. In order to enable the
Appellants to seek such rectification, the time provided for compliance of the
direction of the Tribunal shall stand extended by two weeks.
3. With these observations both the appeals are disposed of.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial) am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) No. 341 of 2019 and 342 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free