Approval of Resolution Plan - Viola Resorts Private Limited
- CitationI.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 in C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under Section 30(6) of the Code, the Adjudicating Authority must satisfy itself that a resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors by the requisite voting share meets the requirements of Section 30(2); its role is limited to that scrutiny and it cannot modify a plan the CoC has approved in its commercial wisdom, so that the grounds for rejection are confined to non-conformity with Section 30(2). A resolution plan which provides for payment of insolvency resolution process costs, payment of operational creditors' debts, management of the corporate debtor's affairs after approval, and implementation and supervision of the plan by the resolution professional and the CoC, as contemplated by Section 30(2)(a) to (d), and which is supported by a compliance certificate in Form H under Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations, satisfies Section 30(2) and the CIRP Regulations and is therefore to be approved. Upon approval, under the principle applied by the Tribunal from the Supreme Court's decision in Ghanshyam Mishra, all claims not part of the approved plan stand extinguished, and no person may initiate or continue proceedings in respect of such claims. Reliefs, concessions and dispensations falling within the domain of other government departments or authorities are not granted by the Tribunal under the plan; they are to be sought from the competent authorities, and a plan waiver of future statutory obligations is not effective as such against those authorities.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. The instant application bearing I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 has been filed by Mr. Anil Kashi Drolia, the Applicant/Resolution Professional (RP) of Viola Resorts Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code/IBC) on behalf of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of the Corporate Debtor, seeking approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Consortium of Mr. Ashish Agarwal along with Anantham Hospitality Private Limited (Successful Resolution Applicant / SRA) and approved by 100% of the voting share of the members of the CoC.
2. Background
2.1 The Corporate Debtor is a private limited company incorporated on 07.04.2010 with its registered office at 9B, Dhaval Ganga, 1, Carter Road Bandra (West), Mumbai-400050. The Corporate Debtor has a sizeable presence in the hospitality industry and was engaged in the business of providing hotel services prior to the commencement of its Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
2.2 Pursuant to the C.P.(IB)No.61/MB/2023 filed by Small Industries Development Bank of India, viz., the Financial Creditor (FC) under Section 7 of the IBC, this Adjudicating Authority (AA) initiated CIRP of the Corporate Debtor vide Order dated 06.06.2023. Mr. Anil Kashi Drolia was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and was subsequently confirmed by the CoC as the Resolution Professional (RP).
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 3. Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
3.1 The IRP made public announcement in Form A on 09.06.2023, informing the commencement of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor and inviting claims from creditors of the Corporate Debtor to enable the constitution of CoC. Following the publication of Form-A and receipt of claims received from the creditors, the RP constituted the CoC of the Corporate Debtor, and an I.A. 3436 of 2023 certifying the same was disposed of as allowed by this AA vide Order dated 08.08.2023.
3.2 The 1st CoC meeting was convened on 05.07.2023, wherein the IRP was confirmed as the RP, and the members were apprised about the process of appointment of valuer, publication of Form G, and preparation of Information Memorandum (IM). The 2nd CoC meeting was convened on 03.08.2023, wherein the RP, inter alia, apprised the CoC that he is carrying on the business of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern and managing its day-to-day operations. The Applicant RP further circulated the draft Form G, Evaluation Matrix, and eligibility criteria to the CoC for deliberation, and following certain discussions, the CoC approved them at the meeting. The RP thereafter published Form G on 05.08.2023, inviting Expression of Interest (EOI) for the resolution of the Corporate Debtor.
3.3 Based on the information and documents available with the Applicant RP, he prepared the IM and circulated the same with the CoC on 09.09.2023 after obtaining the requisite undertaking from the CoC member. Further, based on nineteen EOIs received, the Applicant RP issued the provisional list of Prospective Resolution Applicants (PRAs) on 10.09.2023. The same was duly apprised to the CoC members in the 3rd meeting of CoC, which was convened on 11.09.2023. The Applicant RP further circulated the draft of the Request for Resolution Plans (RFRP), Evaluation Matrix, and Eligibility Criteria to the CoC, and, following certain discussions, the CoC resolved to approve the same.
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 3.4 Pursuant to the issuance of the provisional list of PRAs, a few PRAs approached the Applicant for a refund of their EMD, and thereafter, upon verification of the documents of the interested PRAs, the Applicant shared the final list of PRAs on 14.09.2023 with the CoC. The 4th Meeting of CoC was convened on 06.10.2023, wherein, inter alia, it was apprised to the members that, pursuant to CoC’s approval, the Applicant had issued the RFRP, Evaluation Matrix, and IM to the PRAs on 15.09.2023. The 5th Meeting of the CoC was convened on 27.10.2023, during which the Applicant apprised the CoC that he had received seven resolution plans from the PRAs and opened all seven for discussions.
3.5 The CoC resolved to file for extension of 90 days at the end of 180 days in the CIRP period in its 6th Meeting convened on 28.11.2023, and an I.A. 5563/2023 was filed for the same, which was allowed by this AA vide Order dated 08.12.2023, thereby extending the CIRP period till 02.03.2024, i.e., expiry of 270 days. The Applicant/RP convened the 7th CoC meeting on 11.12.2023, wherein the Applicant apprised the members of the updated resolution plan received from only one of the PRAs, i.e., RVS Global Solution Private Limited, and informed them that the same had been submitted to the consultant for vetting.
3.6 The 8th CoC Meeting was convened on 25.01.2024, wherein the Applicant/RP apprised the CoC that he had received the final vetting reports of the resolution plans and Section 29A compliance reports. The Applicant indicated to the CoC that one of the PRAs, i.e., Mr. Nitin Tulsidas Chimbaikar, again sought an additional 15 days to submit his modified/ revised resolution plan to which the Applicant apprised the CoC that 270 days of CIRP are expiring on 02.03.2024 and requested the CoC as well as PRAs to expedite the process. As a result, the CoC members allowed the PRA to submit his revised plan by 02.02.2024.
3.7 The Applicant conducted the 9th CoC Meeting on 12.02.2024, wherein Mr. Nitin Tulsidas Chimbaikar, again sought time till 14.02.2024 to submit his
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 revised plan with an increased financial bid, which was approved by the CoC. The Applicant also apprised the members that the 270-day CIRP period would expire on 02.03.2024 and requested the PRA to submit the revised financial bid on or before 14.02.2024. Since 270 days of the CIRP period had expired on 02.03.2024, in view of maximizing the value of assets and with the objective of achieving the resolution of the Corporate Debtor, the CoC resolved to extend the CIRP period by 60 days from the expiry of 270 days. Accordingly, an I.A. 1260/2024 was filed, and the same was allowed by this AA vide Order dated 22.03.2024, thereby extending the CIRP period till 01.05.2024, i.e., expiry of 330 days.
3.8 The Applicant RP conducted the 10th CoC meeting on 20.02.2024, wherein the CoC discussed the plan with revised financial bid received from Mr. Nitin Tulsidas Chimbaikar, and after concluding the discussion, the members suggested to call him to disclose the source of funding and to improve the financial proposal by the next CoC meeting. The 11th CoC Meeting was convened on 26.02.2024, during which discussions were initiated with all the PRAs regarding their sources of funds in their proposed resolution plans. Consequently, the PRAs apprised the CoC and the Applicant/RP of their sources of funds; however, due to the unavailability of certain supporting documents, all the PRAs sought time to provide the same. The Applicant/RP also confirmed the appointment of the valuers who had submitted their valuation reports with the CoC on 13.03.2024 after obtaining the requisite undertaking.
3.9 The Applicant/RP thereafter convened various CoC meetings, i.e., 12th CoC meeting on 04.03.2024, 13th CoC meeting on 20.03.2024, 14th CoC meeting on 05.04.2024, and 15th CoC meeting on 19.04.2024, wherein the PRAs submitted their revised resolution plans/addendum to the resolution plans, and the same were extensively discussed by the CoC. Subsequently, the 16th CoC Meeting was convened on 22.04.2024, during which the Applicant/RP put the agenda item for approval of the resolution plan to a vote. Pursuant to which, the CoC resolved to approve the Resolution Plan
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 submitted by the consortium of Mr. Ashish Agarwal, along with Anantham Hospitality Private Limited, with 100% voting share. Consequently, the said PRA consortium was declared the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA).
3.10 The CoC in its 17th Meeting held on 29.04.2024, resolved to extend the CIRP period for another 30 days at the expiration of 330 days. Accordingly, an I.A. 2491/2024 was filed, which was allowed by this AA vide Order dated 21.05.2024. It is further seen that the Resolution Plan dated 20.10.2023 was amended by two Addenda to the Resolution Plan dated 27.11.2023 (1st Addendum) and 18.02.2025 (2nd Addendum). The Applicant/RP has thus approached this Tribunal seeking approval of the updated Resolution Plan dated 25.04.2024 read with the Addenda to the Resolution Plan dated 18.02.2025. During the pendency of the Application, the SRA, in response to the queries raised by the Bench, filed additional affidavits dated 14.04.2026 and 20.04.2026, clarifying certain clauses of the Resolution Plan, which are taken on record.
4. Background of SRA
It is submitted that the SRA is a consortium of two members, viz., Mr. Ashish Agarwal along with Anantham Hospitality Private Limited. The lead consortium member, viz., Mr. Ashish Agarwal (RA1), is engaged in the business of the hospitality industry, real estate construction, and power generation. The other consortium member, viz., Anantham Hospitality Private Limited (RA2), is a company limited by shares incorporated on 03.03.2023 and is a holding company of Agarwal Hospitality Private Limited, a well-known group with a sizeable presence in the construction industry for the last six decades. RA1 is one of the promoters/directors of RA2 w.e.f. 03.03.2023. Both members of the SRA consortium have indicated that they have no relationship with the Corporate Debtor.
5. Salient features of the Resolution Plan
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 The SRA states that out of the total claims filed by the relevant stakeholders, claims amounting to Rs. 16,91,71,844/- have been admitted by the Applicant RP as follows:
(Amount Rs.)
Sr. Name of the creditors Amount claimed Amount of claim No. admitted 1 Secured Financial Creditor SIDBI 16,62,40,954 16,57,40,954 Total (1) 16,62,40,954 16,57,40,954 2. Operational Creditors 30,03,932 28,10,212 Staah Hotel Software Pvt Ltd 17,700 10,620 Maharashtra Electricity Distribution 4,16,410 4,16,410 Company Limited Finwill Crop 43,500 43,500 Parin Pramodrai Thakkar 65,500 65,500 Tarun P Jain & Associates 64,400 64,400 Dev Consultancy 94,750 94,750 Aparna Chetan Dagli 63,000 63,000 Otis Elevator Company (India) Ltd 94,990 73,156 Sai Audio 92,700 92,700 Phoenix 2,28,090 1,13,296 ESIC Sub Reginal office Pune 4,14,651 4,14,651 Income tax officer TDS 2(3)(3) 1,53,630 1,53,630 Employees Provident Fund 2,36,974 2,36,974 organisation Lonaval Security Force 2,98,540 2,64,673 Aroma Theraophy International 99,712 83,822 Limited Concept Hospility Private Limited 2,10,192 2,10,192 Lucky Traders 53,980 53,980 Lucky Traxdelink 82,416 82,416 Climax Enterprises 65,568 65,313 Kohli Gas services 49,376 49,376 Jai Malhar Mutton Shop 1,58,253 1,58,253 Total (2) 30,03,932 28,10,212 3. Employees Authorised Representative -Mr. 6,20,678 6,20,678 Tanaji Bondre Total (3) 6,20,678 6,20,678 Total 16,98,65,564 16,91,71,844
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 6. Source of Funds
6.1. As per Section 4 of the proposed Resolution Plan, the SRA states that the total amount and any subsequent working capital infusion shall be brought in by the RA/ Nominees and shall be contributed to the Corporate Debtor as a mix of equity capital and debt/loans by the SRA/ its Nominees/its Affiliates and/or as otherwise provided in the Resolution Plan, in the following manner:
4.2 INFUSION /SOURCE OF FUNDS: (Amount Rs.) Sr. Nature Upfront Payment T to90 Days Total No. (T+29 days) 1. Owned Funds / 9,00,00,000 7,91,71,844 16,91,71,844 Borrowed Funds
4.3 UTILISATION OF FUNDS: (Amount Rs.) Sr. Particulars Upfront T to90 Total No. Payment (T+29 Days days) 1. Financial Creditors 8,65,69,110 7,91,71,844 16,57,40,954 2. Operational Creditors 28,10,212 0 28,10,212 3. Employees 6,20,678 0 6,20,678 Total 9,00,00,000 7,91,71,844 16,91,71,844
6.2. Accordingly, the SRA proposes an Equity Infusion of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- in the form of equity share capital in the Corporate Debtor out of the total Upfront Payment amounting to Rs. 9,00,00,000/-. The remaining amount of Rs. 7,00,00,000/- as the balance of the total Upfront Payment amounting to Rs. 9,00,00,000/- and Rs. 7,91,71,844/- (Seven Crore Ninety-One Lakh Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty-Four Rupees) shall be infused by the SRA as debt in Corporate Debtor out of the owned/borrowed funds of the RA.
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 7. Implementation Schedule
The SRA has proposed to implement the Resolution Plan in consonance with Table 1 at Section 5 of the Resolution Plan, titled ‘Term and Implementation Schedule’ as extracted hereunder: INDICATIVE ACTIVITY SCHEDULE Sr. No. Activity Timeline 1. Presentation of Proposed Plan to the CoC 2. Approval of Proposed Plan by CoC X 3. RA to give Performance Guarantee Within 3 days from LOI receipt by the RA 4. Application to NCLT X+30 Days 5. Approval by NCLT T 6. Notice on the CD’s Website, if any 7. Intimation to the IBBI, MCA, Tax authorities, GST Authorities and various other Statutory Authorities (as T+15 Days applicable) 8. Intimation to all creditors, existing shareholders and other stakeholders of the Company INDICATIVE ACTIVITY SCHEDULE Sr. No. Activity Timeline 9. Upfront of Rs. 8,65,69,110/- to the SFC T+29 Days 10. Upfront of Rs. 28,10,212/- to the Operational Creditor T+29 Days 11. Upfront of Rs. 6,20,678/- towards the Employees claims T+29 Days 12. Determination of record date for extinguishment of capital On Upfront Payment and allotment of fresh shares to the RA/its nominees 13. To handover the peaceful and vacant possession of all T+29 Days assets of the CD to the RA 14. To open an escrow account and deposit all the T+49 Days original/clear title deeds and other related documents of all the assets of the CD with third party as per Paragraph 3 of Resolution Plan 15. Balance payment of Rs. 7,91,71,844/- to SFC as within 60 Days from envisaged in the Resolution Plan as per Paragraph 3 of the Upfront Payment Resolution Plan 16. On the date of the Final Consideration, the escrow agent shall release and then transfer all the original/clear documents, deeds including inter alia, title deeds, lease deeds and such other identified document to the RA with free and marketable title, without any encumbrance from On the date of Final the SFC with the requisite NOC from the SFC who has Consideration. any charge on the property by the RP and CoC respectively on the compliance of Paragraph 3 of the Resolution Plan 17. Reconstitution of the Board On or before T+75 Days
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 18. Closing Date T+89 19. Filing of all the requisite forms with ROC, if any and On or before T+160 appointment of IMC and other terms for implementation Days of the approved Resolution Plan Other approvals and filings required under the plan - RBI (if any) - Income-tax Act 20 - Filing of various documents with MCA. T+180 Days - Other Governmental Authorities as mentioned in the definitions above (within one year from the approval of the Resolution Plan by the AA). 21. Issue of new share certificates On or before T+220 Days INDICATIVE ACTIVITY SCHEDULE Sr. No. Activity Timeline 22. Payment of OTS amount Rs. 22,50,000/- (Rupees Forty- Within 30 days of Two Lakh Fifty Thousand only (including Rs. 10,00,000/- successful Rupees Ten Lakh only) already available with SIDBI in implementation of the form of FD in the name of the personal guarantors. resolution plan and payment of Plan amount 23. Conveyance of Land payment of compromise settlement amount & Plan amount
8. Treatment of Claims
8.1. As per Section 5 of the Resolution Plan titled ‘Mandatory Contents of the Resolution Plan’, the SRA proposes a total allocated amount of Rs.18,41,71,844/- towards settlement of Insolvency Resolution Cost, and claims of other stakeholders in the following manner:
As a % Proposed Claims of Total Payments % of Stakeholders Admitted* Liability as per the Admitted Tenure (Days) Resolution Claims from Trigger (i) (ii) Plan* Date CIRP Cost 0 0 0 0 - Employees 6,20,678 0.36 6,20,678 100 Upfront payment Operational 28,10,212 1.66 28,10,212 100 Upfront payment Creditors Secured Upfront payment Financial 8,65,69,110 Creditors
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 Secured Within 60 Days Financial 7,91,71,844 97.98 16,57,40,954 100 from the Upfront Creditor payment Total 16,91,71,844 100 16,91,71,844 100 Working Within 2 years of Capital to be the NCLT Order contributed/ -- -- 1,50,00,000 --arranged by the RA in the CD Total 18,41,71,844
8.2. CIRP Cost: The SRA states that NIL value has been allocated against CIRP costs in the Resolution Plan as the same is fully paid. In the event, the Corporate Debtor/SRA discovers or becomes liable to pay any other CIRP Cost at any time in future over and above the amounts provided in the Resolution Plan, the amount of such liability will be adjusted from the amount payable to the Secured Financial Creditors under this Resolution Plan and shall stand reduced by such amounts.
8.3. Secured Financial Creditors: The SRA states that towards the admitted claim of the secured financial creditors amounting to Rs. 16,91,71,844/-, it proposes an upfront payment of Rs. 8,65,69,110/- to be payable by the SRA/ Nominees on or before the Trigger Date. The balance amount of Rs.7,91,71,844/- shall be paid by the RA within 60 days from the Upfront Payment.
8.4. Operational Creditors (Workmen and Employees): The SRA states that towards the admitted claim of the Employees amounting to Rs. 6,20,678/-, it proposes the payment in full and final settlement thereof.
8.5. Operational Creditors (Statutory Authorities): The SRA proposes an upfront payment of Rs. 28,10,212/- towards discharge of their Operational Debt in full and final settlement thereof.
9. PUFE Transactions
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 The Applicant RP has categorically affirmed that there are no transactions under Sections 43, 44, 45, or 66, and hence, an avoidance application relating to the Corporate Debtor has not been filed by the Applicant. Notwithstanding the same, the SRA has stated in Section 6.5 of the Resolution Plan that if any amounts or benefits or favourable order received by the Corporate Debtor on account of the preferential and other transactions, only the FC shall have the right to the benefits of such reversal transactions or Order even if the same is made after the Effective Date without any recourse to the Corporate Debtor or SRA.
10. Performance Security
The Applicant RP submits that the SRA has also provided a Performance Bank Guarantee dated 15.05.2024 amounting to Rs. 1,78,16,820/-, i.e., 10% of the total claims admitted by the Applicant, in compliance with the provisions of the Code.
11. Capital Reduction and Issuance of New Shares
The SRA has proposed Capital Reduction and Issuance of New Shares in accordance with Regulation 37 r/w. Regulation 31 of the CIRP Regulations, under Section 6.3 of the Resolution Plan titled ‘CAPITAL REDUCTION, TREATMENT TO THE EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS AND ISSUANCE OF NEW EQUITY SHARES TO RA/ ITS NOMINEES’, in the manner as extracted hereunder:
• Simultaneously with the subscription of the equity shares by the SRA and its Nominees, the entire shares held by the existing shareholders shall stand fully extinguished as a part of this Resolution Plan ("Standalone Capital Reduction”). The face value of the Equity so cancelled shall stand transferred to the capital reserve/ retained earnings of the Corporate Debtor, and such amount shall be appropriated at the sole discretion of the RA. No amount shall be paid/payable towards the extinguishment of the existing share capital to such existing shareholders.
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 • The RA shall not be required to make any separate application before the Hon'ble NCLT for the standalone capital reduction and for other matters set out herein, under the provisions of the CA 2013/Code and that the approval of this Resolution Plan by the Hon'ble NCLT shall be treated as if the necessary approvals required to have been obtained under the CA 2013 or any other applicable law, including consent of shareholders or creditors of the Corporate Debtor and applications to any other appropriate authority, as required under the CA, 2013 together with the process laid down under the CA, have been obtained and duly complied with.
• No further approval of the Hon'ble NCLT will be required to give effect to the standalone capital reduction under the CA 2013 and there shall be no requirement to add "and reduced" in the name of the Corporate Debtor as the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Hon'ble NCLT shall be deemed to be an order under Section 66 of the CA 2013 along with other applicable provisions of the CA 2013, sanctioning and approving the standalone capital reduction and all matters hereto. No further approval of the Hon'ble NCLT shall be required for utilization of capital reserve as stated in clause (a) above.
• The standalone capital reduction shall be approved · and implemented pursuant to the provisions of the Code, specifically, Regulation 37 of the CIRP Regulations read with Section 31 of the Code. The compliance with the provisions of the Resolution Plan in relation to the standalone capital reduction shall be deemed to be in accordance with and constitute compliance with any and all provisions of the Applicable Law that would have otherwise applied to a similar reduction of capital under the CA 2013 and / or under rules/ circulars / regulations issued thereunder.
12. Monitoring Committee
12.1. Section 5.3 of the Resolution Plan titled ‘MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF AFFAIRS OF THE CORPORATE DEBTOR’ envisages constitution and COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 supervision by a Monitoring Committee (MC) upon approval of this Plan to oversee its implementation, which shall comprise one representative each from the SRA and SFC, along with the RP. In this regard, the SRA proposes as follows:
1. In order to ensure that the Resolution Plan is implemented in accordance hereof and that the obligations undertaken herein are adhered to in letter and spirit and for smooth transition, an appropriate Implementation and Monitoring Committee may be constituted (''IMC") on the Hon'ble NCLT Approval Date.
2. During the period from the Hon'ble NCLT Approval Date and up to the Trigger Date, the Corporate Debtor shall be managed by the IMC as set out in this Resolution Plan, which shall be immediately appointed as per the terms hereof upon sanction of the Resolution Plan by the Hon'ble NCLT to monitor the Implementation of the approved Resolution Plan.
3. The IMC shall be formed with the members of the SFC having One Representative, RA having one Representative and Resolution Professional will also be one of the members of the IMC. The IMC so formed shall supervise effective implementation and execution of the approved Resolution Plan.
4. The excess of liabilities written back shall be taken to capital reserves or general reserve as the RA decides and shall be available to RA for adjusting against accumulated losses, or declaration of dividend or issue of bonus shares etc as the RA wishes to use.
5. The signing authority for IMC shall be vested with any member of the IMC.
6. The power and functions of the IMC will, inter-alia, be as follows: (a) ensure and supervise the implementation of the approved Resolution
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 Plan as approved by the Hon’ble NCLT; (b) provide updates to the IBBI as and when required; (c) Inform the applications for regulatory and third-party approvals to be filed by the RA for implementation and consummation of the transactions contemplated in the Resolution Plan in a form and manner agreed with the RA. (d) To ensure utilization of Corporate Debtor’s funds and payment of dues in accordance with the terms of this Resolution Plan; (e) Use of any legal counsel or any such professional as required for advice that it may need in relation to this Resolution Plan or the transactions contemplated herein; and (f) At all times, be empowered to do all such acts, deeds or things and exercise all rights and privileges and perform all duties, which now or hereafter, may pertain to the IMC in order to accomplish the purpose of the Resolution Plan.
13. The SRA has further confirmed that it is eligible to submit the Resolution Plan in consonance with Section 29A of IBC, 2016. An Affidavit-cum-Undertaking dated 16.05.2024 has been submitted to that effect.
14. Addenda to the Resolution Plan
14.1. The Applicant RP states that the Resolution Plan dated 25.04.2024 submitted by the SRA contemplated the transfer of the land i.e., Gat No. 216, Hissa No. 2, Wakasi Village, Maval, Pune, Maharashtra - 410405 upon which, Mr. Nitin Chimbaikar i.e., the suspended director of the Corporate Debtor, has freehold rights, and the Corporate Debtor was holding leasehold rights in its name. An I.A. 4542/2024 was filed by Mr. Nitin Chimbaikar, wherein the approval of the said Resolution Plan was challenged, and, further, the extinguishment of the personal guarantees was sought.
14.2. The Applicant RP states that in order to achieve maximization of value of assets of the Corporate Debtor, the CoC comprising of Small Industries Development Bank of India i.e. FC, had entered into a Compromise Settlement with the suspended director in terms of OTS Letter dated
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 03.02.2025, as per which Mr. Nitin Chimbaikar communicated his no objection towards transfer of the Land to the SRA under the Resolution Plan.
14.3. Accordingly, I.A. 4542/2024 was withdrawn by Mr. Nitin Chimbaikar, as recorded by this AA vide Order dated 04.02.2025, and consequent effect of the said compromise/ settlement by way of the addendum dated 18.02.2025 to the Resolution Plan dated 25.04.2024 was placed before the CoC for its consideration and voting. The addendum dated 18.02.2025 was accordingly voted upon at the 22nd CoC meeting dated 19.02.2025 and approved with a 100% voting share. Accordingly, the Resolution Plan dated 25.04.2024 is amended by Addenda to the Resolution Plan dated 18.02.2025. Some of the clauses of the Resolution Plan were modified/clarified by SRA vide additional affidavits dated 14.04.2026 and 20.04.2026.
15. Viability of Resolution Plan
15.1. The Applicant/RP submits that the Resolution Plan approved by the CoC is in compliance with the legal requirements as mandated under the IBC. The Applicant has annexed a certificate under FORM H to the Application, in terms of Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations, certifying that the Resolution Plan approved by the CoC meets all the requirements of the IBC, and the same forms part of the records.
15.2. The Applicant RP has further placed the requisite valuation reports issued by independent valuers for (i) Land and Building, (ii) Plant and machinery, and (iii) Securities and Financial Assets, in compliance with this AA’s Order dated 07.10.2024.
16. Analysis and Findings
16.1. Upon perusal of the Resolution Plan, it is observed that the Resolution Plan provides for the following:
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 i. Payment of CIRP Cost as specified under Section 30(2)(a) of the Code;
ii. Repayment of Debts of Operational Creditors as specified under Section 30(2)(b) of the Code;
iii. For management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, after the approval of the Resolution Plan, as specified under Section 30(2)(c) of the Code; and iv. The implementation and supervision of the Resolution Plan by the RP and the CoC as specified under Section 30(2)(d) of the Code.
16.2. The Applicant RP submits that the Resolution Plan approved by the CoC complies with the legal requirements mandated under IBC, viz., Sections 30(1), 30(2)(a), 30(2)(b), 30(2)(c), 30(2)(d), 30(2)(e), 30(2)(f) of the IBC, read with Regulations 37 and 38 of the CIRP Regulations. The RP has annexed Certificate in Form H to the Application under Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations, certifying that the Resolution Plan, as approved by the CoC, meets all the requirements of the IBC and the Regulations.
16.3. The Applicant/RP has filed the Compliance Certificate in the FORM H dated 16.05.2024 along with the plan. Upon perusal, the same is found to be in order. The Resolution Plan has been approved by the members of CoC in the Sixteenth meeting dated 22.04.2024, with a voting percentage of 100%.
17. Reliefs/ Concessions
The SRA has additionally sought certain Waivers, Reliefs, and Concessions, as per Sections 6, 7, and 8 of the Resolution Plan. We make it expressly clear that no reliefs, concessions, and dispensations that fall within the domain of other Government departments/authorities are granted hereto, and the same shall be dealt with by the respective competent authorities/fora/offices, Government (State or Central), with regard to the respective reliefs, if any. Be that as it may, the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant RP has categorically affirmed that the implementation of the Resolution Plan is not conditional or contingent upon the COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 grant of any or all of such reliefs, concessions, and dispensations by this Tribunal.
18. In the case of K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank & Others [(2019) ibclaw.in 08 SC], the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that if the CoC approves the Resolution Plan by the requisite percent of voting share, then, as per section 30(6) of the Code, it is imperative for the resolution professional to submit the same to the Adjudicating Authority. On receipt of the plan approved by the CoC, the Adjudicating Authority is required to satisfy itself that the resolution plan, as approved by the CoC, meets the requirements specified in Section 30(2) of the IBC. The Hon’ble Court observed that the role of the NCLT is ‘no more and no less’. It further held that the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority is circumscribed by Section 31 of the IBC and is limited to scrutiny of the Resolution Plan “as approved” by the requisite percent of voting share of financial creditors. Even in that enquiry, the grounds on which the Adjudicating Authority can reject the resolution plan are in reference to matters specified in Section 30(2) of the Code when the resolution plan does not conform to the stated requirements.
19. In Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta and Ors [(2020) 8 SCC 531], the Hon’ble Apex Court clearly laid down that the Adjudicating Authority would not have the power to modify the Resolution Plan, which the CoC, in their commercial wisdom, had approved. In para 42, the Hon’ble Court observed as under:
“Thus, it is clear that the limited judicial review available, which can in no circumstance trespass upon a business decision of the majority of the Committee of Creditors, has to be within the four corners of section 30(2) of the Code, insofar as the Adjudicating Authority is concerned, and section 32 read with section 61(3) of the Code, insofar as the Appellate Tribunal is concerned, the parameters of such review having been clearly laid down in K. Sashidhar (supra).”
20. In view of the afore-stated discussions and the law thus settled, the instant Resolution Plan meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code and COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 Regulations 37, 38, 38 (1A) and 39 (4) of the CIRP Regulations. The Resolution Plan is thus not in contravention with any of the provisions of the Code, and is in accordance with law. The same deserves to be approved.
ORDER
In view of the above, I.A.(IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 in C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 is hereby allowed. The Resolution Plan dated 25.04.2024, as modified by the Addenda dated 18.02.2025 and read with Additional Affidavits dated 14.04.2026 and 20.04.2026, is hereby approved. It shall become effective from this date and shall form part of this Order.
I. The Resolution Plan, as approved by this Tribunal, shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government, or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force is due, guarantors, and other stakeholders involved in the Resolution Plan.
II. Further, in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ghanshyam Mishra And Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited [(2021) ibclaw.in 54 SC] on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims which are not a part of the plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not a part of the plan. Accordingly, no person, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders, will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect of a claim prior to CIRP which is not part of the Resolution Plan.
III. The approval of this Resolution Plan shall not be construed as a waiver of any future statutory obligations/liabilities of the Corporate Debtor, and the same shall be dealt with by the appropriate authorities in accordance with COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 law. Any waiver sought in the Resolution Plan relating to the period after the date of this order, more particularly licences and approvals for keeping the Corporate Debtor, shall be subject to approval by the authorities concerned, and this Tribunal will not deter such authorities from dealing with any of the issues arising after effecting the Resolution Plan. This Tribunal, however, recommends that due consideration be given to the revival of the Corporate Debtor.
IV. The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) of the Corporate Debtor shall accordingly be amended and filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), Mumbai, Maharashtra, for information and record. However, if any approval of shareholders is required under the Companies Act, 2013, or any other law for the time being in force for the implementation of actions under the Resolution Plan, such approval shall be deemed to have been given, and it shall not be a contravention of that Act or law.
V. The Successful Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan, shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being in force, within such period as may be prescribed. Any benefit that arises from statutes other than the Code is subject to approval by the respective authorities under that statute.
VI. The concessions sought in relation to the stamp duty, taxes, registration charges, etc., for implementation of the approved Resolution Plan are not granted. However, the Resolution Applicant is at liberty to approach the competent authorities for exemptions, if permitted by law.
VII. The reliefs sought in the Resolution Plan that are not explicitly granted are considered rejected, with liberty to the Resolution Applicant to approach the concerned authorities, without prejudice to this rejection.
VIII. In accordance with Section 32A of the Code, the liability of the Corporate Debtor for an offence committed prior to the commencement of the COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process shall cease, and the Corporate Debtor shall not be prosecuted for such an offence committed prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process from the date of this order.
IX. The SRA is at liberty to approach competent Authorities for any exemption as sought in relation to Income Tax Returns, waivers from the applicability of any section under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and other indirect taxes arising out of the implementation of the Resolution Plan.
X. The moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC shall cease to have effect from the date of this Order.
XI. The RP shall supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan and file status of its implementation before this Authority from time to time, preferably every quarter.
XII. The Applicant/RP shall forward all records relating to the conduct of the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the IBBI, along with a copy of this Order for information.
XIII. The Applicant/RP is further directed to hand over all records, documents, and properties of the Corporate Debtor to the SRA to enable it to carry on the business of the Corporate Debtor.
XIV. A certified copy of the Resolution Plan as modified by the Addenda dated 18.02.2025 and read with Additional Affidavits dated 14.04.2026 and 20.04.2026 shall be provided by the Designated Registrar, as downloaded from the Data Management System of NCLT, on an application by the Applicant/RP.
XV. The Applicant shall forthwith send a certified copy of this Order to the CoC and the SRA, respectively, for necessary compliance.
COURT – IV I.A. (IBC)(Plan) No. 40 of 2024 IN C.P. (IB) No. 61/MB/2023 21. The I.A.(IBC)(Plan) No. 40/2024 in CP (IB) No.61/MB/2023, having the Plan Value of Rs.18,41,71,844/- is approved and disposed of in terms of the above.
Sd/- Sd/- ANIL RAJ CHELLAN K. R. SAJI KUMAR MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Aditya, LRA
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free