Approval of Resolution Plan- Samson And Sons Builders And Developers Private Limited

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. … Corporate Debtor. Order delivered on: 14.08.2024 Coram: Hon’ble Member (Judicial) : TMT. Justice T Krishna Valli. Hon’ble Member (Technical) : Shri. Ravichandran Ramasamy. Appearances: For the Applicant : Mr. Vinod P.V., Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Liju V Stephen, Adv.

Per: Coram 1. The application has been filed under Sections 30(6) and 31(1) of the IBC, 2016 read with Regulation 37(m) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 by the Resolution Professional in the matter of the. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. seeking the approval of the Resolution Plan submitted for the Project Angel Woods by the Angel Wood Apartments Allottees Association. 2. The Company Petition CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 was filed by M/s Vijayakumaran J, VJ Constructions against M/s. Samson and Sons Builders and Developers Pvt Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) which was admitted vide Order dated 03.11.2021. Accordingly, Mr.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. Muhammed Davood K. having Registration No. IBBI/lPA-OO1/IP- P02357/2020-2021/13499 was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professorial (“IRP”) from the Panel of IPs. It is stated that Mr. Muhammed Davood K. vide letter dated 07.11.2021 informed the Registry about his inability to continue as IRP due to his poor health and hence aide Order dated 09.11.2022, this Tribunal replaced the IRP with Mr. Lukose Joseph as an IRP from the panel of IPs. The order was issued on 12.11.2022. In the 2nd meeting of the CoC held on 10.01.2022, Mr. K Parameswaran Nair was appointed as the Resolution Professional (“RP”) and this Tribunal confirmed the appointment of RP aide Order dated 16.03.2022 in IA(IBC)/14/KOB/2022. 3. It is stated that the IRP made a public announcement inviting claim on 15.11.2021 in Form-A in two newspapers, viz, Deshabhimani and Business Line and a supplement to the Paper publication on 21.11.2021 and 22.11.2021 with the name of representatives for Class of Creditors. Based on the updated claims received, the COC of the Corporate Debtor consists of the following members and their voting shares as follows: Sl Name of Financial Creditor Voting Percentage No. (Secured/Unsecured) 1. Kerala Financial Corporation 19.51% (Secured FC) 2. State Bank of India (Secured FC) 9.06%

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. 3. Unsecured Financial Creditors 68.25% belonging to Class of Creditors Home Buyers 4. Unsecured Financial Creditors 3.01% belonging to Class of Creditors Deposit Holders. 5. Toyota Financial Services India Ltd- 0.17% Secured Financial Creditor. Total 100%

4. It is stated that the total claims received and admitted by IRP/ RP as on 05.04.2023 are as follows: Sl No. Category of Creditor Claim received Claim admitted (provisionally) 1. Financial Creditor (Secured) ➢ SBI ➢ KFC 14,94,01,359 14,94,01,359 ➢ Toyota Financial 32,16,57,547 32,16,57,547 Services India 28,11,083 28,11,083 Ltd. 2 Unsecured Financial 3,00,00,000 - Creditors (other than Financial Creditors

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. belonging to any class of creditors) 3. Class of Creditors- 7,94,18,576 4,95,60,620 Deposit Holders 4. Class of Creditors- 144,67,67,669 1,13,21,75,476 Home Buyers 5. Operational Creditors - - (Employees and Workmen) 6. Operational Creditors 13,45,77,264 13,45,77,264 (Govt. dues) 7. Operational Creditors 1,57,43,558 1,43,03,886 (Others) 8. Other Creditors 8,70,57,485 8,67,76,287 Total 2,26,74,34,541 1,89,12,63,522 5. It is stated that the Corporate Debtor was incorporated on 27.07.2009 and was engaged in the business of real estate development. Before the commencement of CIRP, there were ten projects under construction, which are at different stages of development. Out of ten projects, in four projects no construction ever commenced. The last AGM of the Corporate Debtor was held on 30.09.2014 and the balance sheet was filed before the ROC only up to 31.03.2014. The last audited balance sheet was available till 31.03.2015. No books of account of the Corporate Debtor were available. RP had filed an application for non-cooperation against

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. the suspended directors. However, suspended directors filed a reply stating that creditors ransacked them and the public and police put them in jail during 2016-2017. When they returned, many of the documents were either destroyed and ransacked or missing. After hearing the aforesaid applications, this Tribunal passed an order dated 22.12.2022 directing the suspended directors to cooperate. The RP and COC have conducted the verification of claims and proceeded with the conduct of CIRP with only the available information with the Corporate Debtor. It is further stated that the registered office was closed and the Corporate Debtor has not been operational since 2016 and has been in a defunct status since then. 6. It is stated that in terms of the provisions of Section 25(2)(h) of the Code read with Regulation 36A (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (“CIRP Regulations”), invitations in Form ‘G’ for Expression of Interest (“EOI”) from potential resolution applicants (PRA’S) were issued on 09.06.2022, however, the Applicant did not receive any Resolution Plan.

7. Hence, the CoC in its meeting held on 08.11.2022 decided to invite both holistic and project-wise resolution plans for the Corporate Debtor because of the amendment to the Regulation by which the IBBI has inserted a new Regulation 37(m) with effect from 16.09.2022 to the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons] Regulation, 2016 (“Regulation”) enabling the KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. PRAs to submit project wise/asset wise Resolution Plan to the Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, the Applicant published the EOI on 12.11.2022 in two newspapers i.e., Business Line (English) and Deshabhimani (Malayalam). The last date for submission of EOI was 07.01.2023 The eligibility criteria for submission of the Resolution Plan were as follows: a) Minimum net worth of Rs. 3 Crores as investment in the Project. b) Home Buyers Association of Allottees were excluded from EMD and reduced the Performance Guarantee to Rs. 15 lakhs due to substantial investment as Home Buyer Allottees.

8. It is stated that in response to the second EOI, the Applicant received EOI from 8 PRAs. The final list of PRAs, in accordance with Regulation 36A (12) of CIRP Regulation was issued on 18.12.2022. The last date for submission of the Resolution Plan was 07.01.2023. 9. It is stated that out of the 8 PRAs, 6 PRAs submitted the Project Resolution Plan as follows: Sl No. Project Name Name of PRA 1. Angel Woods JDA Angel Wood Apartment Allottees Association 2. Orchid Valley Orchid Valley Apartment Buyers Association 3. Pearl Crest-JDA Pearl Crest Apartment Buyers Association

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. 4. Sanctuary Sanctuary Apartment Owners Association 5. Nova Castle Nova Castle Apartment Owners Association 6. Sharon 1 Sharon Hill Residents Association.

10. It is stated that out of the six Resolution Plans thus received, three Resolution Plans submitted by Angel Wood Apartment Allotees Association, Orchid Valley Apartment Buyers Association and Pearl Crest Apartment Buyers Association were found compliant per the provisions of the IBC, 2016. The Applicant has placed all the Resolution Plans before the CoC at its 10th meeting held on 27.01.2023 and 02.02.2023 along with the preliminary report of RP on the Plans after circulating the copy to all the members of the CoC, who have submitted the confidentiality agreement. 11. It is stated that IBBI has amended the Regulation permitting project-wise Resolution Plans for the revival of the Corporate Debtor, it does require the approval of all numbers of CoC including approval of home buyers in other projects for its approval. There are 10 Projects in the Corporate Debtor and only in 6 Projects, RP has received the Resolution Plans and out of 6 Resolution Plans thus received, 3 Resolution Plans were non-compliant with the IBC, 2016 and IBBI Regulations. It is stated that since Regulation 37(m) provides for the asset-wise sale of the Corporate Debtor, the compliance report was also made in pursuance of the Liquidation

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. Value about the said assets. Because of the non-compliant nature of the Resolution Plans for three of the Projects, the members of the CoC in its 11th meeting held on 04.04.2023 resolved not to put all the Resolution Plans for voting until and unless all the Plans were found compliant and further resolved by 77.31% voting Rights to seek an extension of 90 days from this Tribunal. 12. In the meantime, the home buyer’s association of three projects, viz, Angel Wood Apartment Allottees Association, Orchid Valley Apartment Buyers Association, Pearl Crest Apartment Buyers Association whose plans were compliant under the provisions of IBC, 2016 and Regulations convinced the other associations of home buyers and requested the RP to put their plans for voting because the CIRP period was ending on 16.04.2023. Accordingly, three compliant resolution plans were put for voting in the 12th meeting of the COC held on 14.04.2023, according to which the COC has approved the three Resolution Plans with more than 66% voting rights as follows: - Sl no. Name of Projects Resolution Applicant Voting Rights 1. Pearl Crest Pearl Crest 80.32% Apartment Buyers Association 2. Angel Woods Angel Wood 71.26% Apartment Owners Association

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. 3. Orchid Valley Orchid Valley 80.32% Apartment Buyers Association 13. It is stated that since the Applicant has received project-wise Resolution Plans, the present application is filed for approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant, Angel woods Apartment Owners Association for the Angel Woods project of the Corporate Debtor. It is further stated that according to the approval of the Resolution Plan, the Applicant has issued the Compliance Certificate in Form ‘H’ in compliance with Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP IBBI (CIRP) Regulations It is stated that the Resolution Applicant has confirmed in its Declaration/ Affidavit dated 07th January 2023 and Undertaking dated 07th January 2023 that they are eligible under Section 29A of the Code to submit Resolution Plan. Further, the Resolution Applicant also meets the eligibility criteria of PRA’s for submitting the Resolution Plan as decided by the CoC in its meeting held on 08.11.2022. 14. It is stated that the Applicant issued the Letter of Intent to the Resolution Applicant on 20.04.2023. According to the issue of Letter of Intent, the Successful Resolution Applicant has remitted Rs.15,00,000 Lakhs to the current account No. 41085054510 with SBI on. 24.04.2023, the Corporate Debtor maintained by the Applicant at SBI in lieu of the Performance Guarantee. 15. It is stated that the details of various compliance as envisaged within the Code and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (“CIRP Regulations”) that the Resolution Plan is required to adhere to which is reproduced hereunder: - SUBMISSION OF RESOLUTION PLAN IN TERMS OF SUB- SECTION (2) OF THE CODE Section/Regulation Requirement Clause of the Resolution Plan/Additional Documents. Section 30(2)(a) of The Resolution Plan Clause No. 5.2.1, of the Code provides for the page no. 14 of the payment of Resolution Plan Insolvency provides for the Resolution Process proportionate share costs in a manner of the CIRP cost for specified by the the Project Angel Board in priority to Woods Project the repayment of either Rs. 6,00,000 other debts of the of the shares of the Corporate Debtor. actual CIRP cost. Section 30(2)(b) of The Resolution Plan Schedule 2, clause d the Code provides for the & e of page no. 48. debts of the Operational Creditors in such

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. manner as may be specified by the Board which shall not be less than the amount to be paid to the Operational Creditors in the event of Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 53 or less than the amount payable to the Operational Creditors if the Resolution proceeds were to be distributed by the priority under Section 53, whichever is higher. Section 30(2)(b) of The Resolution Plan NA since no secured the Code provides for the Financial Creditor. payment of liquidation value to KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. the dissenting Financial Creditors. Section 30(2)(c) of The Resolution Plan Clause 9 on page no. the Code provides for the 30 of the plan. management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor after approval of the Resolution Plan Section 30(2)(d) of The Resolution Plan Clause 10 on page the Code provides for the no. 32. implementation and supervision of the Resolution Plan. Section 30(2)(e) of The Resolution Plan Clause 11 on page the Code does not no. 32. contravene any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force.

MANDATORY CONTENTS OF RESOLUTION PAN IN TERMS OF REGULATION 38 OF THE CIRP REGULATIONS Regulation Requirement Provision in Resolution Plan

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. Regulation 38(1) The amount due to Schedule 2 of Clause the Operational d & e of page no. 48. Creditors under a Resolution Plan shall be given priority in payment over Financial Creditors Regulation The Resolution Plan Clause 12 of page 38(1)(A) shall include a nos. 33 & 34 of the statement as to how plan. it has dealt with the interests of all the stakeholders, including Financial Creditors and Operational Creditors of the Corporate Debtor. Regulation The Resolution Plan NIL 38(1)(B) shall include a statement giving details of the Resolution Applicant or any of KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. its related parties has failed to implement or contribute to the failure of implementation of any other resolution plan approved by the AA at any time in the past Regulation 38(2)(a) The Resolution Plan Clause 3.1.1 of page shall provide the nos. 56-58. term of the Plan and its implementation schedule Regulation 38(2)(b) The Resolution Plan Clause 9 of page no. should state the 30. management and control of the business of the Corporate Debtor during its term. Regulation 38(2)(c) The Resolution Plan Clause 10 of page should have no. 32. adequate means for KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. supervising its implementation. Regulation 38(2)(e) The Resolution Plan Yes, clause 11 of should be in page no. 32. compliance with the provisions of the law for the time being in force Regulation 38(3) The Resolution Plan Clause 3.1 of page shall demonstrate no. 11. that it addresses the Clause 3.3 of page cause of default, no. 12. it is feasible and Clause 10 of page viable, it has no. 32. provisions for its Schedule-2 of effective Clause 3.1.1. implementation, it Page no. 56 has provisions for Part C, Stage II of the approvals required page no. 57. and the timeline Clause 4.2 of page for the same and the no. 13. RA has the capability to implement the Resolution Plan.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd.

16. It is stated that pursuant to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2022, and subsequent addition of Regulation 38(2)(d) concerning avoidance transactions, the Resolution Plan at clause 5.2.3.2 provides that “Any proceeds accruing to the Corporate Debtor in terms of any order of the Adjudicating Authority on the applications for the avoidance of transactions under Sections 43, 45, 50 and 66 (as applicable) of the Code filed / to be filed by the Resolution Professional/lenders before the Adjudicating Authority shall be in favour of the secured financial creditors on proportional basis up to the maximum claim as on insolvency commencement date and thereafter to other creditors as under section 53 (1) of the IBC. The applicant hereby assigns such claims to the secured financial creditors for further initiating/proceeding with the steps for recovery. Accordingly secured financial creditors will be responsible for pursuing such matters at their cost”. 17. It is stated that the Successful Resolution Applicant has submitted an Undertaking/ Declaration /Affidavit under Section 29A. The Successful Resolution Applicant has also given an undertaking as provided under Regulation 39(1)(c) of CIRP Regulation. 18. The relevant information concerning the total financial proposal under the Resolution Plan is tabulated as under: - Particulars Amount in Lakhs

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. Payment towards CIRP Estimated Cost Rs. 6 Lakhs Payment to Operational Rs. 10.74 Lakhs Creditors, excluding employees and workmen along with statutory dues. Payment to employees and 0.00 workmen. Payment to Secured Financial 0.00 Creditors in multiple installments. Payment to Unsecured Rs. 1239.65 Lakhs to HB & DH Financial Creditors. Payment to Related Party dues NIL Payment to Equity NIL Shareholders. Payment towards Working Rs. 27.84 Lakhs Capital. Payment towards Capital Rs. 1055.82 Lakhs Expenditure. Total Rs. 3453.13 Lakhs.

19. We have heard the submissions made by the counsel for all the parties and perused the materials available on record. It is emphasized that upon approval of a resolution plan by the CoC the Adjudicating Authority's obligation under Section 31 of the Code is KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. to confirm that the plan fulfills the requirements outlined in subsections (2) and (4) of Section 30. Additionally, the Adjudicating Authority is barred from interfering with the commercial wisdom of the CoC. The Hon’ble Apex Court has consistently upheld that the CoC's commercial wisdom should be given paramount importance, without any judicial interference, to ensure the timely completion of the prescribed processes under the IBC. 20. Hence, when evaluated with the aforementioned facts, we believe that the CoC has duly considered the feasibility and viability of the Plan, and other compliance under Section 30(2) of the Code. Consequently, the Resolution Plan meets the stipulated requirements of the Code and relevant regulations. Moreover, the Resolution Plan conforms with the law and does not violate any provisions of Section 29A of the Code. 21. This Tribunal notes that the Resolution Plan submitted the Resolution Applicant per Sections 30 and 31 of the Code and also complies with Regulations 38 and 39 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. No circumstances exist that militate against the grant of approval for the Resolution Plan. Thus, the Application filed by the Resolution Professional is hereby approved. 22. We are further relying on Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v/s Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. (2021 SCC online SC 313) where the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims which are not a part of Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not a part of the Resolution Plan. 23. We are particularly emphasizing judicial precedent where the Apex Court had already taken a view that no claims can be entertained after the approval of the resolution plan by the CoC. 24. The Resolution Applicant prays for the following reliefs and concessions to be granted to the Corporate Debtor and/or the Resolution Applicant, the orders thereon are indicated against each. Sl. Relief/Concessions/Waivers Orders thereon no 1. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Granted in the NCLT shall permit the terms of IBC, extinguishment of whatsoever rights 2016 and interests of the corporate debtor in the Angel Woods Project in the manner contemplated in this Plan and for the release of the Angel Woods Project to the Resolution Applicant as contemplated under the Resolution Plan.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. 2. All governmental authorities shall grant It is for the any relief, concession or dispensation as Appropriate may be required for the implementation Authorities to of the transactions contemplated under consider the Plan in accordance with its terms and conditions. including any stamp duty payable with respect to any documents executed in relation to such transactions. 3. The CBDT/DOR shall grant the It is for the following exemptions/waivers: (i) from Appropriate the applicability of Section 281 of the Authorities to Income Tax Act, 1961, including consider obtaining a no-objection certificate from income tax authorities in respect of all the pending proceedings and dues (including interest and penalty) of the Corporate Debtor arising for periods up to the NCLT Approval Date (including such proceedings and dues for periods prior to the NCLT Approval Date that may crystallize subsequent to the NCLT Approval Date). Further, CBDT/DOR shall restrict/restrain from treating any transactions contemplated in this Plan as being void or non-compliant with any provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961; and (ii) from all tax liabilities (including interest and penalty) and tax proceedings arising in respect of periods up to the NCLT Approval Date, including such liabilities/proceedings

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. for periods up to the NCLT Approval Date that may crystallize subsequent to the NCLT Approval Date in respect of on-going or potential income Tax litigations at all levels. 4. That all existing legal proceedings and Granted in the right to extinguish any such terms of IBC, proceedings for the period prior to the 2016. NCLT Approval Date in relation to land of the JV partner shall stand extinguished from and on the NCLT Approval Date. 5. To declare that the Plan is approved and Granted in binding on the Corporate Debtor and its terms of IBC, employees. members, all creditors, 2016. including the Central Government, any State Government, or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force. such as authorities to whom statutory dues are owed, guarantors, and other stakeholders involved in the Plan, pursuant to section 31 of the Code. 6. All creditors (including the Financial Granted Creditors) of the Corporate Debtor shall subject to the withdraw all legal proceedings provisions of commenced against the project/land of IBC, 2016 and JV partners involved in the Projects other including ongoing litigations in relation applicable to their claims, including proceedings laws. under the Securitization and KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and shall quash all criminal proceedings including proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, if any, immediately after the NCLT Approval Date.

7. A direction be issued to the Resolution Granted Professional/Monitoring Agent to, (i) subject to IBC, write back all the liabilities attributable 2016 and other to the project, including creditors, term applicable laws loans, working capital loans, tax and as per liabilities, other statutory liabilities, etc. Ghanshyam which are not payable and reflect the Mishra and total liabilities at the amount of the Sons Private consideration (as reduced by the Limited vs amount of insolvency resolution Edelweiss process costs) determined during CIRP; Asset and (ii) the assets which are not Reconstruction recoverable (debtors, inventories and Company loans and advances, etc.) should be Limited written down to their realizable value. 2021 SCC The Resolution OnLine SC 313 Professional/Monitoring Agent shall complete all the statutory processes and hand over the Angelwoods project of the Corporate Debtor in a clean slate to the Resolution Applicant. The financial statement and returns filed shall be final

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. and binding and shall be treated as conclusive. 8. A direction be issued to the Registrar of Granted Companies and/or any Governmental subject to IBC, Authorities to permit to update 2016 and other statutory filings by the Resolution applicable laws Professional/Monitoring Agent immediately after the NCLT Approval Date without any fines or penalties as such statutory dues are completely waived by operation of this Plan for releasing charges if any created on the JV project. 9. All assets including properties (whether Granted in freehold, leasehold or license basis), terms of IBC, awards, judgments, decrees, orders, and 2016 and other all other actionable claims, rights, applicable laws entitlements, benefits of the Corporate Debtor (whether reflected in the books or not) with regard to the Angel Woods Project shall continue to remain vested in the Corporate Debtor free and clear from all encumbrances. 10. A direction be issued that all permits, It is for the granted in favour of the Corporate Appropriate Debtor/land of JV partners (whether Authorities to expired, cancelled, terminated, or consider withdrawn) be renewed/granted or be deemed to continue without disruption, for the benefit of the Resolution Applicant, and all additional Permits required by the RA be made available

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. immediately from the Record Date. All statutory approvals required to the RA to operate its assets (including that for electricity, fire, municipal authorities, building permits. environmental approvals. and licenses) and other permits issued by authorities including but not limited to Airport Authority of India, Indian Navy, Coastal Zone Management Authorities, semi-government authorities shall continue without any additional payments other than as contemplated in the Plan. 25. Regarding the reliefs/waivers pertaining to the domain of various departments/governmental authorities, it is further clarified that this Adjudicating Authority has no power to sanction these waivers, etc. and the Successful Resolution Applicant is at liberty to approach the competent authorities/courts/legal forums/office(s) Government or Semi-Government/State or Central Government for appropriate relief(s) sought in the plan. Approval of the Resolution Plan does not mean automatic waivers. 26. It is directed that any relief sought in the resolution plan, where the contract/agreement/understanding/proceedings/actions/notice etc. is not specifically identified or is for future and contingent liability, is at this moment not acceded to 27. Therefore, subject to the observations made, this Resolution Plan shall form part of this Order.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. 28. The Resolution Plan attached with this order shall become effective from the date of this order and shall form part of this order. The Resolution Plan as approved is binding on the Corporate Debtor, Creditors and others involved so that the revival of the Corporate Debtor can come into force with immediate effect. 29. The Moratorium imposed under section 14 shall cease to have effect from the date of this order. 30. In case of non-compliance of this order or withdrawal of the Resolution Plan, the CoC shall forfeit the Performance Guarantee amount already paid by the Resolution Applicant. 31. The RP shall stand discharged from his duties with effect from the date of this Order. He shall, however, perform his duties in terms of the Resolution Plan as approved by this Adjudicating Authority. 32. The Monitoring Committee shall take charge of the implementation of the Resolution Plan of the Angel Wood Project of the Corporate Debtor with effect from the date of this Order. 33. The Monitoring Committee shall endeavour to complete the plan implementation within 18 months after a pre-construction period of 90 days from the date of this Order. 34. The Resolution Applicant shall have access to all the Corporate Debtor’s records, documents, assets and premises with effect from the date of this Order, to finalize the further line of action required for starting the business operations of the Corporate Debtor.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 In re: - Mr. Vijayakumaran J. Vs. M/s. Samson and Sons Builders Developers Pvt. Ltd. 35. The Resolution Applicant shall file a copy of this Order with the Registrar of Companies, Kochi, inter alia for updating the status of the Corporate Debtor. 36. Accordingly, this Application being IA (IBC)/216/KOB/2023 IN CP(IB)/05/KOB/2021 is allowed. 37. The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties and their Learned Counsel for information and for taking necessary steps. 38. Additionally, the Registry shall send a copy of this order to the Registrar of Companies, Ernakulam, Kerala. 39. A Certified Copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance with all requisite formalities 40. File be consigned to records. Sd/ Sd/- RAVICHANDRAN RAMASAMY T KRISHNA VALLI (MEMBER TECHNICAL) (MEMBER JUDICIAL) Dated this the 14th day of August, 2024. Rajasree R. Nair/LRA.