Approval of Resolution Plan - Rite Builtec Private Limited
- CitationI.A. No. 91 of 2024 in C.P. (IB) No. 1023-MB-2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority's power under Section 31(1) read with Section 30(6) is confined to scrutinising whether the Resolution Plan, as approved by the Committee of Creditors by the requisite voting share, meets the requirements of Section 30(2); it has no power to modify a plan that the Committee has approved in its commercial wisdom. Where the Resolution Professional has certified compliance and the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that the plan meets the Section 30(2) requirements and the Regulations, and that it does not contravene Section 29A, the plan is to be approved. A plan that is silent on a condition imposed by a third-party authority may be cured by a later addendum approved by the Committee of Creditors with the requisite voting share, where the addendum is placed before the Adjudicating Authority by additional affidavit and the Committee's approval is itself a matter of commercial decision within Section 30(4) and (6). On approval, the moratorium under Section 14 ceases, and claims not forming part of the approved plan stand extinguished, so that no person may initiate or continue proceedings in respect of such claims.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 ORDER 1. The instant application has been filed on 23.10.2024 by Mr. Amit Karia, the Applicant Resolution Professional (“RP”) Rite Builtec Private Limited. (“Corporate Debtor”), under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “IBC, 2016”) on behalf of the Committee of Creditors seeking approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited (the “SRA / Successful Resolution Applicant”) and approved by 100% of the voting share of the members of the Committee of Creditors (hereinafter referred to as “CoC”) of the Corporate Debtor herein.
2. The brief facts of the Application are as follows: 2.1 Pursuant to the captioned petition bearing C.P. (IB) No. 1023/MB/2022 filed by Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited (“Financial Creditor”) u/s. 7 of IBC, 2016, this Tribunal was pleased to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) of the Corporate Debtor herein vide Order dated 25.08.2023. In furtherance thereof, Mr. Amit Karia (IBBI Reg. No.: IBBI/IPA-001/IP- P02600/2021-22/13969) was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional (“IRP”).
2.2 Applicant RP submits that the suspended directors of the Corporate Debtor initiated an appeal before the Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal challenging the admission of the present petition. By an order dated 14.09.2023, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal issued a stay order on the constitution of the Committee of Creditors (hereinafter referred to as the "CoC"). The appeal was dismissed by an order dated 06.11.2023. However, the stay order issued by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal resulted in a delay
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 of 54 (Fifty-Four) days in the constitution of the CoC of the Corporate Debtor. Subsequently, the said IRP made a public announcement, informing the commencement of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor, and thereby invited claims from stakeholders of the Corporate Debtor, and the CoC was constituted accordingly.
2.3 The First Meeting of the CoC was held on 17.11.2023, wherein CoC resolved to appoint the Applicant as the Resolution Professional. On 10.01.2024, Applicant published the invitation for expression of interest in Form G in two newspapers and the last day for submission was 25.01.2024. However, the CoC had directed to extend the date till 16.03.2024. Pursuant to this, a modified Form G in the form of addendum was published on 01.03.2024. In response to these advertisements, 9(Nine) EoIs were received, out of which 7(Seven) could be accepted since the remaining 2 (Two) failed to pay the process participation fees.
2.4 On 26th of February, 2024, the Applicant RP had been informed over email that the Original Petitioner had assigned its debt/ claim against the Corporate Debtor to "Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt Ltd" by way of an assignment agreement dated 13.02.2024. Pursuant to this assignment, the Applicant had filed an application before this Tribunal for modification / reconstitution of the COC.
2.5 As per the time schedule set out in the final revised Form G, the prospective resolution applicants were to submit the resolution plans before the 15.05.2024. Two of the resolution applicants sought an extension to submit the resolution plans, and the COC directed the Applicant to extend the time till the 31.05.2024. This was done at the 5th (Fifth) meeting of the COC held on the 14.05.2024.
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022
2.6 The Applicant RP submits that only two resolution plans were received. During the 7th CoC meeting on 24.06.2024, resolution applicants presented their plans and discussed them with the CoC. However, both plans were rejected at the subsequent 8th CoC meeting. Consequently, the CoC directed the Applicant to publish a new Form-G on 10.07.2024, inviting fresh expressions of interest. This resulted in the receipt of five resolution plans.
2.7 The Applicant RP submits that at the 13th CoC meeting held on 03.10.2024, the presentation of the resolution plans was done by the 5 Resolution Applicants. Upon examination of the Resolution Plan submitted pursuant to the same, and after being duly satisfied with the requisite compliances thereof during the 14th CoC meeting dated 16.10.2024; The Resolution Plan submitted by Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited stood approved with 100% of the voting share and it was thus declared as the Successful Resolution Applicant (“SRA”) for the Corporate Debtor.
Salient features of the Resolution Plan 3. The Applicant RP submits that the Resolution Plan on behalf of the Successful Resolution Applicant viz. Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited has proposed a payment of INR 37 Crores in the manner as encapsulated hereunder: “The Resolution Applicant proposes to make payment to the stakeholders of the Corporate Debtor under this Resolution Plan in respect of insolvency resolution of the Corporate Debtor, The Resolution Applicant, as part of the Resolution Plan, proposes to make a total payment of an amount not exceeding INR 37,00,00,000 Crore (INR Thirty-Seven Crore Only) ("Total Resolution Amount") for resolution of the Corporate Debtor in terms of the provisions of the Code.”
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Sr. Category of Claimed Verified Proposed Payment no. Claims Amount Amount out of the Total Resolution Amount A Insolvency and Resolution At actual 1,00,00,000 Process Cost B Payment to stakeholders 1 Secured 105,36,59,153 105,36,59,153 36,00,00,000 Financial Creditors (SFC) 2 Unsecured - - - Financial Creditors 3 Operational 5,62,80,240 5,62,80,240 Nil Creditors 4. Other 61,00,00,000 42,16,39,419 Nil Creditors Total 171,99,39,393 153,15,78,814 37,00,00,000
4. The Successful Resolution Applicant has proposed Implementation of Resolution Plan timeline(s), via Item {9.1}, in the manner as extracted hereunder:
# Action Indicative Timeline 1 Approval of NCLT for the Plan T 2 Formation of the Monitoring Committee 3 Handling over the operations of the Corporate Debtor by the Resolution Professional to the Monitoring Committee. 4 Upfront payment infusion by the Resolution Applicant T+15 days 5 Selective reduction of capital of Corporate Debtor 6 Infusion of the Upfront Amount into the Corporate Debtor 7 Reconstruction of the Board of the Corporate Debtor 8 Payment towards the CIRP Costs 9 Payment towards the Secured Financial Creditor
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 5. The Successful Resolution Applicant viz. Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited, has further confirmed that it is eligible to submit the Resolution Plan in consonance with Section 29A of IBC, 2016.
Viability of the Resolution Plan 6. The Applicant RP hereby submits that the Resolution Plan approved by the CoC is in compliance with the legal requirements as mandated under IBC, 2016.
7. At this juncture, we find it germane to draw reference to the extensions and/or exclusions sought during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor, and the same have been tabulated hereunder for ready reference:
I.A. Filed On Relief Sought Status No. 1227 of 24.01.2024 Exclusion of 54 days from Allowed vide 2024 calculating CIRP Period. Order dated 21.03.2024. 2872 of 17.04.2024 Extension of 90d beyond 180d Allowed vide 2024 w.e.f. 15.04.2024 Order dated 06.06.2024. 3523 of 27.06.2024 Extension of 60d beyond 270d Allowed vide 2024 w.e.f. 15.07.2024 Order dated 09.07.2024. 5030 of 11.09.2024 Extension of 60d beyond 330d Allowed vide 2024 w.e.f. 12.09.2024 Order dated 21.03.2024.
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 8. As per the Applicant RP the averages of the Fair Value and Liquidation Value have been determined by the Registered Valuer(S). The averages of the said determination of the requisite Fair Value and Liquidation Value are as hereunder: Fair Value: INR 38,89,13,360.00 /- (Rupees Thirty-eight crores, eighty-nine lakhs, thirty thousand, three hundred and sixty only) Liquidation Value: INR 24,42,43,360.00 /- (Rupees Twenty-four crores, forty-two lakhs, forty-three thousand, three hundred and sixty only)
9. The Ld. Counsel for the Resolution Professional Applicant has annexed a certificate of the Form-H to the Application, under Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to certify that the Resolution Plan has approved by the CoC meets all the requirements of the IBC and its Regulations, as extracted hereto:
FORM H COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE (Under Regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 I, Amit Vijay Karia, an insolvency professional enrolled with IIIPICAI and registered with the Board with registration number IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P02600/2021-2022/13969, am the resolution professional for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Rite Builtec Private Limited.
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 2. The details of the CIRP are as under: Sr Particulars Description 1 Name of the CD Rite Builtec Private Limited 2 Date of Initiation of CIRP August 25, 2023 3 Date of Appointment of IRP August 25, 2023 4 Date of Publication of Public Announcement August 27, 2023 Stay imposed by NCLAT & subsequently excluded from the 5 54 days CIRP period Date of resumption of CIRP after removal of stay on 6 November 7, 2023 06.11.2023 7 Date of Constitution of CoC November 8, 2023 8 Date of First Meeting of CoC November 17, 2023 9 Date of Appointment of RP November 23, 2023 Date of Appointment of Registered Valuers: • KKCA Valuers LLP [Land and Building] December 3, 2023 10 • iVAS Partners [Land and Building] December 4, 2023 • Pravin Navandar [Securities or Financial Assets] December 3, 2023 • Manish Jaju [Securities or Financial Assets] December 3, 2023 Date of Issue of Invitation for EoI • Original Publication January 10, 2024 11 • 1st addendum January 29, 2024 • 2nd addendum March 1, 2024 • 3rd addendum July 10, 2024 Date of Final List of Eligible Prospective Resolution 12 Applicants August 4, 2024 (in IEOI dated July 10, 2024) 13 Date of Invitation of Resolution Plan August 7, 2024 14 Last Date of Submission of Resolution Plan September 6, 2024 15 Date of Approval of Resolution Plan by CoC October 21, 2024 Date of Filing of Resolution Plan with Adjudicating 16 October 22, 2024 Authority 17 Date of Expiry of 180 days of CIRP April 15, 2024 Date of Order extending the period of CIRP • 90 days extension (180-270 days) June 6, 2024 18 • 60 days extension (270-330 days) July 9, 2024 • 60 days extension (beyond 330 days) October 22, 2024 19 Date of Expiry of Extended Period of CIRP November 11, 2024 Rs.38,89,13,360/- 20 Fair Value [INR 38.89 crores] Rs.24,42,43,360/- 21 Liquidation value [INR 24.42 crores] 22 Number of Meetings of CoC held 14 (Fourteen)
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 3. I have examined the Resolution Plan received from the Resolution Applicant ‘Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited’ and approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Rite Builtec Private Limited with 100% voting share.
4. I hereby certify that: (i) the said Resolution Plan complies with all the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (Code), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations) and does not contravene any of the provisions of law for the time being in force. (ii) the Resolution Applicant ‘Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited’ has submitted an affidavit pursuant to Section 30(1) of the Code confirming its eligibility under Section 29A of the Code to submit resolution plan. The contents of the said affidavit are in order. (iii) the said Resolution Plan has been unanimously approved by the CoC in accordance with the provisions of the Code and CIRP Regulations made thereunder. The Resolution Plan has been approved by 100% of voting share of the financial creditors after considering its feasibility and viability and other requirements specified in the CIRP Regulations. (iv) The voting of the members of the COC was conducted by electronic voting system which was kept open for atleast 24 hours as per the requirement of Regulation 26. 5. The list of financial creditors of the CD, Rite Builtec Private Limited, being members of the CoC and distribution of voting share among them is as under: Voting for Resolution Plan (Voted Sr Name of Creditor Voting Share (%) for / Dissented / Abstained) Omkara Assets 1 Reconstruction Private 100% VOTED FOR / ASSENTED Limited Total 100% 6. The Resolution Plan includes a statement under Regulation 38(1A) of the CIRP Regulations as to how it has dealt with the interests of all stakeholders in compliance with the Code and regulations made thereunder. 7. The amounts provided for the stakeholders under the Resolution Plan is as under:
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Amount Provided Amount Category of to the Sub-Category Amount Amount Provided SN Stakeholde Amount of Stakeholder Claimed Admitted under the r* Claimed Plan# (%) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Secured (a) Creditors not Financial having a right to Creditors vote under sub- - - - -section (2) of section 21 (b) Other than (a) above: (i) who did not NA NA NA NA vote in favour of 1 the resolution Plan (ii) who voted in favour of the 105,36,59,153 105,36,59,153 36,00,00,000 34.17% resolution plan
Total [(a) + (b)] 105,36,59,153 105,36,59,153 36,00,00,000 34.17%
Unsecured (a) Creditors not Financial having a right to Creditors vote under sub- NA NA NA NA section (2) of section 21 (b) Other than (a) above: 2 (i) who did not NA NA NA NA vote in favour of the resolution Plan (ii) who voted in favor of the NA NA NA NA resolution plan Total[(a) + (b)] - - - -
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Amount Provided Amount Category of to the Sub-Category Amount Amount Provided SN Stakeholde Amount of Stakeholder Claimed Admitted under the r* Claimed Plan# (%) Operational (a) Related Creditors Party of - - - - Corporate Debtor (b) Government 5,62,80,240 5,62,80,240 NIL 0% Dues (c) Employees & 3 NA NA NA NA workmen (d) Other than workmen & Employees & NA NA NA NA Government Dues Total[(a)+(b)+( 5,62,80,240 5,62,80,240 NIL - c)+(d)] Other debts 4 61,00,00,000 42,16,39,419 NIL 0% and dues Grand Total - INR 171,99,39,393 153,15,78,812 36,00,00,000 20.93%
8. The interests of existing partners have been altered by the Resolution plan as under: No. of Shares No. of Shares Voting Share Sl. Category of Share Voting Share (%) held before held after (%) held No Holder held after CIRP CIRP the CIRP before CIRP 1 Equity 10,000 0 100% 0% 2 Preference NA NA NA NA 9. The compliance of the Resolution Plan is as under: Section of the Code / Requirement with respect to Clause of Compliance Regulation Resolution Plan Resolution Plan (Yes / No) No. Requisite details / Whether the Resolution Applicant Information / Documents meets the criteria approved by pertaining to eligibility / 25(2)(h) the CoC having regard to the capability of the YES complexity and scale of Resolution Applicant has operations of business of the CD? been provided by the MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Section of the Code / Requirement with respect to Clause of Compliance Regulation Resolution Plan Resolution Plan (Yes / No) No. Resolution Applicant as part of the Resolution Plan / expression of interest and / or as part of the supporting documents with the Resolution Plan / expression of interest. Chapter 3.1 & 3.2 on Page 14 of the resolution plan Requisite details / Information / Documents pertaining to compliance with Section 29A of the Code have been provided Whether the Resolution Applicant by the Resolution is eligible to submit resolution Applicant as part of the Section 29A plan as per final list of Resolution Resolution Plan/ Professional or Order, if any, of YES expression of interest and the Adjudicating Authority? / or as part of the supporting documents with the Resolution Plan / expression of interest
Provided separately along Section Whether the Resolution Applicant with the documents has submitted an affidavit stating 30(1) that it is eligible? relating to the Resolution YES Plan
Whether the Resolution Plan- Chapter 5.1 on Section (a) provides for the payment of YES 30(2) insolvency resolution process Page 20 of the plan costs?
Chapter 4 on Page 16 (b) provides for the payment to read with Chapter 5.2 on the operational creditors? YES Page 20 of the plan (b) provides for the payment to the financial creditors who did not vote in favor of the resolution YES Chapter 4 on Page 18 and plan?
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Section of the Code / Requirement with respect to Clause of Compliance Regulation Resolution Plan Resolution Plan (Yes / No) No. Chapter 6 on the plan (c) provides for the management Chapter 8 on of the affairs of the corporate Page 41 of the plan debtor? YES (d) provides for the implementation and supervision Chapter 9 on of the resolution plan? YES Page 46 of the plan
Chapter 11 on (e) contravenes any of the the plan. provisions of the law for the time Does not contravene any YES being in force? of the provisions of law for the time being in force
Whether the Resolution Plan YES, the resolution plan is YES (a) is feasible and viable, feasible and viable according to the CoC? according to the COC. Section 30(4)
(b) has been approved by the CoC YES, the resolution plan with 66% voting share? has been approved by the CoC with 100% voting YES share Whether the Resolution Plan has Chapter 9 on Section provisions for its effective 31(1) implementation plan, according YES Page 46 of the plan to the CoC? Where the resolution professional made a determination if the Yes, there are Regulation corporate debtor has been transactions covered 35A subjected to any transaction of under Sections 43, 45, 50 YES the nature covered under sections or 66. 43, 45, 50 or 66, before the one
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Section of the Code / Requirement with respect to Clause of Compliance Regulation Resolution Plan Resolution Plan (Yes / No) No. hundred and fifteenth day of the An application has been insolvency commencement date, filed with the Hon’ble NCLT numbered IA 3706 of under intimation to the Board? 2024, in relation to fraudulent transactions to the tune of INR 63,92,97,000 /- Whether the amount due to the operational creditors under the Regulation resolution plan has been given Chapter 4.6 on page 19 YES 38 (1) priority in payment over financial creditors? Whether the resolution plan Chapter 4 on page 16 includes a statement as to how it and has dealt with the interests of all Regulation stakeholders? Chapter 5 on (1A) YES the plan (i) Whether the Resolution Applicant or any of its related Chapter 10.1 on page 48 parties has failed to implement or of the plan contributed to the failure of Regulation implementation of any resolution NO 38(1B) plan approved under the Code. (ii) If so, whether the Resolution Applicant has submitted the (ii) NA statement giving details of such non-implementation? (a) (b) Whether the Resolution Plan provides: (a) the term of the plan and its (a) Chapter 9 on page 46 implementation schedule? of the plan
Regulation (b) for the management and (b) Chapter 8 on page 41 38(2) control of the business of the YES of the plan corporate debtor during its term?
(c) adequate means for (c) Chapter 8.4 on page 41 supervising its implementation? of the plan
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Section of the Code / Requirement with respect to Clause of Compliance Regulation Resolution Plan Resolution Plan (Yes / No) No. Whether the resolution plan demonstrates that: (a) it addresses the cause of (a) Chapter 2.6 on page 12 default?
(b) Chapter 2.6 on page 12 (b) it is feasible and viable? & 13
Regulation (c) it has provisions for its (c) Chapter 8 on page 41 38(3) YES effective implementation? and Chapter 9 on page 46 & 47 of the plan (d) it has provisions for approvals (d) Chapter 7 on page 31 required and the timeline for the of the plan same? (e) the resolution applicant has (e) Chapter 3 on page 14 the capability to implement the of the plan with resolution plan? annexures An application has been filed with the Hon’ble (c) Whether the RP has filed NCLT numbered IA 3706 of Regulation applications in respect of 2024, in relation to YES 39(2) transactions observed, found, or fraudulent transactions to determined by him? the tune of INR 63,92,97,000 /- (d) As per the terms of the (e) RFRP, Performance (f) Provide details of performance Security of INR 50 lakhs security received, as referred to (Indian Rupees Fifty Lakhs Regulation in sub-regulation (4A) of Only) has been provided 39(4) regulation 36B] by the SRA by way of YES direct transfer in the process specific bank account, pursuant to the issue of Letter of Intent (LOI) by the RP.
10. The CIRP has been conducted as per the timeline indicated as under:
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Section of the Latest Timeline Code / Description of Activity under Actual Date Regulation No. regulation 40A Commencement of CIRP and Appointment of Section 16(1) T 25.08.2023 IRP Regulation 6(1) Publication of Public Announcement T+3 27.08.2023 Section 15(1)(c) / Submission of Claims T+14 07.11.2023 Regulation 12 (1) (NCLAT stay involved) Verification of Claims Regulation 13(1) T+21 08.11.2023 (NCLAT stay involved) Filing of Report Certifying Constitution of Regulation 17(1) CoC T+23 09.11.2023 (NCLAT stay involved) Section 22(1) and regulation First Meeting of the CoC T+30 17.11.2023 17(2) Determination of fraudulent and other Regulation 35A T+115 21.05.2024 transactions 03.12.2023 & Regulation 27 Appointment of two Registered Valuers T+47 04.12.2023 Submission of Information Memorandum to Regulation 36 CoC (NCLAT stay involved & Delayed T+95 04.04.2024 (1) confidentiality undertaking from COC) Invitation of EoI T+75 10.07.2024 Publication of Form G T+75 10.07.2024 Regulation 36A Provisional List of Resolution Applicants T+100 29.07.2024 Final List of Resolution Applicants T+115 04.08.2024 Issue of Request for Resolution Plan, which Regulation 36B includes Evaluation Matrix and Information T+105 07.08.2024 Memorandum to Resolution Applicants Section 30(6) / Submission of CoC approved Resolution Plan T+165 22.10.2024 Regulation 39(4) Section 31(1) Approval of Resolution Plan T+180 -
11. The time frame proposed for obtaining relevant approvals is as under: Name of Authority Name of When to be Sr Nature of Approval who will applicable Law obtained grant Approval 1. - - - - Further, the Resolution Applicant undertakes that they will implement this Resolution Plan, whether the reliefs and concessions are granted or not.
12. The Resolution Plan is not subject to any contingency - Yes
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 or The Resolution Plan is subject to the following contingencies (Elaborate the contingencies): Not Applicable
13. Following are the deviations / non-compliances of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, regulations made or circulars issued thereunder (If any deviation/ non-compliances were observed, please state the details and reasons for the same): Deviation S e c t ion of the Code / Whether rectified or Sr / Non-compliance Regulation No. / Reasons not observed Circular No. Not 1 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Applicable
14. The Resolution Plan is being filed 20 days before the expiry of the period of CIRP provided in Section 12 of the Code, as extended by the Hon’ble NCLT, Mumbai. 14A. Whether the resolution professional has, in accordance with Regulation 35A: (a) applied to the Adjudicating Authority on or before the one hundred and thirty-fifth day of the insolvency commencement date: Yes, applied on July 4, 2024 (b) filed Form CIRP 8 with the Board on or before the one hundred and fortieth day of the insolvency commencement date: Yes, filed on July 9, 2024 (265th day of the ICD)
15. Provide details of Section 66 or avoidance application filed / pending: Date of Filing Date of Order of with Sr Type of Transaction the Adjudicating Brief of the Order Adjudicating Authority Authority Preferential 1 transactions under - - - Section 43 Undervalued 2 transactions under - - - Section 45 3 Extortionate credit transactions under - - - Section 50
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Date of Filing Date of Order of with Sr Type of Transaction the Adjudicating Brief of the Order Adjudicating Authority Authority 4 Fraudulent transactions under July 4, 2024 Awaited NA Section 66
15A. The Committee has approved a plan providing for contribution under Regulation 39B as under: a. Estimated liquidation cost: NA b. Estimated liquid assets available: NA c. Contributions required to be made: NA d. Financial creditor wise contribution is as under: NA 15B. The committee has recommended under Regulation 39C as under: a. Sale of corporate debtor as a going concern: NO b. Sale of business of corporate debtor as a going concern: NO 15C. The committee has fixed, in consultation with the Resolution Professional, the fee payable to the liquidator during the liquidation period under Regulation 39D: NO 16. I, Amit Vijay Karia, certify that the contents of this certificate are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
Amit Vijay Karia Resolution Professional | Rite Builtec Private Limited Contact: +91 9029210069 IBBI Registration no. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P02600/2021-2022/13969 IBBI Registered Email: ipamitkaria@gmail.com IBBI Registered Address: 405, Hind Rajasthan Building, Dadasaheb Phalke Road, Gautam Nagar, Dadar (East), Mumbai - 400014 Date: October 22, 2024 Place: Mumbai
Findings of this Tribunal 10. In the circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the Applicant Resolution Professional has filed this Application seeking approval of this Tribunal on the Resolution Plan, submitted by the Resolution Applicant viz. Aspect
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Global Ventures Private Limited stating that the plan is in accordance with Section 30(2) of IBC, 2016, and other provisions laid thereunder.
11. The Resolution Applicant has additionally sought certain Waivers, Concessions and Relief per Section {7} of the Resolution Plan. We make it expressly clear that no reliefs, concessions and dispensations that fall within the domain of other government department/authorities are granted hereto, and the same shall be dealt with by the respective competent authorities/fora/offices, Government (State or Central) with regard to the respective reliefs, if any.
12. On perusal of the Resolution Plan, it is observed that the Resolution Plan provides for the following: i. Payment of CIRP Cost as specified u/s 30(2)(a) of the Code. ii. Repayment of Debts of Operational Creditors as specified u/s 30(2)(b) of the Code. iii. For management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, after the approval of Resolution Plan, as specified U/s 30(2)(c) of the Code. iv. The implementation and supervision of Resolution Plan by the RP and the CoC as specified u/s 30(2)(d) of the Code.
13. The RP has complied with the requirements of the Code in terms of Section 30(2)(a) to 30(2)(f) of IBC, 2016, and Regulations 38(1), 38(1)(a), 38(2)(a), 38(2)(b), 38(2)(c) & 38(3) of CIRP Regulations.
14. The RP has filed Compliance Certificate in Form-H along with the plan. On perusal the same is found to be in order. The Resolution Plan has been approved by the members of CoC in the (Adjourned) 14th Meeting held on 16.10.2024, with a voting percentage of 100% (One hundred percent).
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 15. Further it can be seen from Form – H that the Application under PUFE transaction IA 3706 of 2024 is pending. The clause 5.7 of Resolution Plan deals with Treatment of PUFE transaction which is reproduced as follows: “5.7 Treatment or Reversal of preferential transactions, undervalued transactions, extortionate transactions, and fraudulent trading: The Resolution Professional shall submit, to the CoC, the details of the following transactions, if any, observed, found or determined by him: Preferential transactions under section 43 of IBC. Undervalued transactions under section 45 of IBC, Extortionate credit transactions under section 50 of IBC and fraudulent/ wrongful trading transactions under section 63 or 66 of IBC and the orders, if any, of the NCLT in respect of such transactions any claim from any counterparty of the PUFE transactions arising due to reversal of any such transactions shall stand extinguished. Any positive recovery as a result of reversal of PUFE transaction would accrue to the benefit of the CoC. The cost for continuing such litigations after the Transfer Date shall be borne by the CoC.”
16. Upon due perusal of the Resolution Plan, this Bench deemed it fit to seek clarification in relation to the payment of rentals of the slum dwellers as the payment of rentals to the slum dwellers was a condition stipulated within the Letter of Intent ("LoI") issued by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, and the Resolution Plan was silent on this aspect. Ld. Counsel appearing at the behest of Resolution Professional was accordingly directed to file the requisite additional-affidavit explaining the same vide order dated 11.11.2024. In compliance with the afore-said directions, the Resolution Professional has sought to file its Additional Affidavit dated 29.11.2024, wherein Applicant RP submits that 15th Meeting of CoC was convened on 27.11.2024 to address outstanding rent arrears. The SRA provided an affidavit dated 27.11.2024 to unconditionally satisfy the outstanding rent arrears as determined and directed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. The specific amount of such rent arrears has not been included within the Resolution Plan as it remains currently undetermined and shall be finalized by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority upon the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Hon'ble NCLT. The Resolution Professional filed an affidavit
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 dated 08.01.2025 enclosing addendum to the Plan which is reproduced as under:
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022
During the 16th CoC meeting dated 08.01.2025, the above Addendum to the Resolution Plan was approved by the CoC with 100% voting share. The relevant extract of the Resolution is reproduced below: "RESOLVED THAT pursuant to sub-section (3), (4) and sub-section (6) of Section 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regulation 39 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons), Regulations 2016 and other applicable provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and rules and regulations made thereunder, the approval of the Committee of Creditors (COC) be and is hereby accorded to the Addendum to the Revised Resolution Plan dated January 7, 2025, submitted by the resolution applicant 'Aspect Global Ventures Private Limited', for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of 'Rite Builtec Private Limited', pursuant to the directions given by the Hon'ble NCLT, Mumbai in the hearing dated January 7, 2025.
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 RESOLVED FURTHER THAT the COC hereby authorizes the Resolution Professional (RP) to submit the said Addendum to the Revised Resolution Plan as approved by the COC before the Hon'ble Adjudicating Authority, by filing necessary additional affidavit under the applicable provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and further to do all acts, deeds and things as may be necessary to give effect to this resolution."
17. In the case of K Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank & Others (in Civil Appeal No.10673/2018 decided on 05.02.2019) the Hon’ble Apex Court held that if the CoC had approved the Resolution Plan by requisite percent of voting share, then as per section 30(6) of the Code, it is imperative for the Resolution Professional to submit the same to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT). On receipt of such a proposal, the Adjudicating Authority is required to satisfy itself that the Resolution Plan as approved by CoC meets the requirements specified in Section 30(2). The Hon’ble Court observed that the role of the NCLT is ‘no more and no less’. The Hon’ble Court further held that the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority is circumscribed by Section 31 and is limited to scrutiny of the Resolution Plan “as approved” by the requisite percent of voting share of financial creditors. Even in that enquiry, the grounds on which the Adjudicating Authority can reject the Resolution Plan is in reference to matters specified in Section 30(2) when the Resolution Plan does not conform to the stated requirements.
18. In CoC of Essar Steel (Civil Appeal No. 8766-67 of 2019 decided on 15.11.2019) the Hon’ble Apex Court clearly laid down that the Adjudicating Authority would not have power to modify the Resolution Plan which the CoC in their commercial wisdom have approved. In para 42 Hon’ble Court observed as under:
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 “Thus, it is clear that the limited judicial review available, which can in no circumstance trespass upon a business decision of the majority of the Committee of Creditors, has to be within the four corners of section 30(2) of the Code, insofar as the Adjudicating Authority is concerned, and section 32 read with section 61(3) of the Code, insofar as the Appellate Tribunal is concerned, the parameters of such review having been clearly laid down in K. Sashidhar (supra).”
19. In view of the discussions and the law thus settled, the instant Resolution Plan meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code and Regulations 37, 38, 38 (1A) and 39 (4) of the Regulations. The Resolution Plan is not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and is in accordance with law. The same needs to be approved. Hence ordered.
20. The present Application being I.A. No. 91 of 2024 in C.P. (IB) No. 1023/MB/2022 is Allowed. The Resolution Plan annexed to the Application is hereby approved. It shall become effective from this date and shall form part of this order.
16.1. It shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force is due, guarantors and other stakeholders involved in the Resolution Plan.
16.2. The approval of the resolution plan shall not be construed as waiver of any statutory obligations of the Corporate Debtor and shall be dealt by the appropriate authorities in accordance with law.
16.3. Further in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ghanshyam Mishra And Sons Private Limited V/S Edelweiss
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims which are not a part of the Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not a part of the Resolution Plan.
16.4. The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) shall accordingly be amended and filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), Mumbai, Maharashtra for information and record. The Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan, shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being in force, within such period as may be prescribed.
16.5. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Code shall cease to have effect from this date.
16.6. The Applicant shall supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan and file status of its implementation before this Authority from time to time, preferably every quarter.
16.7. The Applicant shall forward all records relating to the conduct of the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the IBBI along with copy of this Order for information.
16.8. The Applicant shall forthwith send a certified copy of this Order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant, respectively for necessary compliance.
MUMBAI BENCH – IV I.A. No. 91 of 2024 IN C.P (IB) 1023/MB/2022 21. The captioned Interlocutory Application bearing I.A. No. 91 of 2024 in C.P. (IB) No. 1023/MB/2022 is accordingly Allowed and Disposed-of.
Sd/- Sd/- ANU JAGMOHAN SINGH KISHORE VEMULAPALLI MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
***
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free