Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Approval of Resolution Plan - J - Marks Exim (India) Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal19 April 2023

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that a resolution plan has been approved by the Committee of Creditors by the requisite majority, that it meets the requirements of section 30(2) of the Code, and that no opposition has been raised against it, the plan is to be approved under section 31(1) and becomes binding on the corporate debtor, its creditors (including the Central Government, any State Government or local authority) and other stakeholders. Upon approval of a resolution plan under section 31(1), the claims as provided in the plan stand frozen, and all claims not forming part of the plan stand extinguished, such that no person may initiate or continue proceedings in respect of a claim not part of the plan, including statutory dues owed to any government or local authority for the period prior to approval. Time spent under the moratorium period, where the Adjudicating Authority has ordered its exclusion in open court on account of the COVID-19 lockdown, is excluded from the computation of the CIRP period under section 12, and the resolution plan is to be assessed against the CIRP period so computed.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALMUMBAI BENCH, C-IVIA No. 1576 of 2021andIA No. 333 of 2021INCP No. (IB) 2176/ (MB)/ C-IV/ 2019In the matter of Application under section 30(6) forapproval of Resolution Plan under section 31(1) of theInsolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.In the matter of :Mr. Mukesh VermaResolution Professionalof the Corporate DebtorIn the matter of :Punjab National Bank... Financial CreditorVersusJ-Marks Exim (India) Private Limited…Corporate DebtorOrder delivered on 19.04.2023Coram:Shri Prabhat Kumar Shri Kishore VemulapalliHon’ble Member (Technical) Hon'ble Member (Judicial)Appearances (via videoconferencing)For the Applicant : Mr. Sarosh E. Bharocha for theResolution Professional/ Applicant.MUMBAI BENCH, C-IVIA No. 1576 of 2021ANDIA No. 333 of 2021INCP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019ORDERPer: Prabhat Kumar, Member (Technical)1. The Bench is convened by videoconference today.

2. This Application under Section 30(6), 31 and 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) seeks the approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant.

2.1 The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the Corporate Debtor was initiated by this Bench by an order dated 25.05.2020 under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) (Admission Order) and Mr. Mukesh Verma, was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional, who was appointed as Resolution Professional (RP) of the Corporate Debtor vide resolution passed by CoC in its 2nd meeting held on 11.07.2020.

2.2 It is submitted that the period of CIRP was extended by 90 days upto 20.02.2021 vide order dated 25.01.2021. It was further extended vide order dated 01.03.2021 for a period of 158 days wherein the period from 26.05.2020 to 30.10.2020 was excluded on account of the Covid Lockdown as stated in form H.

2.3 The IRP published a public announcement as per Section 13 & 15 of the Code, inviting claims from the creditors of the Corporate Debtor.

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 The RP issued Form-A under Regulation 6 dated 08.06.2020 calling the creditors to submit their claims. The last date for submission of proof of claim was 19.06.2022.

2.4 Furthermore, the Applicant after approval from the CoC in the 3rd CoC Meeting held on 08.08.2020 published Form G dated 09.08.2020 inviting Expression of Interest from Prospective Resolution Applicants.

2.5 As the said form G did not elicit any response, the Applicant published another Form G dated 03.09.2020. However, the said invitation for expression of interest also did not elicit any response, thus, the Applicant, after instruction from the CoC in its 8th CoC Meeting held on 12.11.2020 again published Form G dated 21.11.2020 wherein the last date for receipt of Expression of Interest was 06.12.2020 which was further extended by 02 days by the CoC till 08.12.2020 and the last date for submission of Resolution Plan was 01.02.2021.

2.6 In pursuance to the publication of Form G dated 21.11.2020, the provisional list of Prospective Resolution applicants was issued on 16.12.2020 and the Final list of Prospective Resolution Applicants was issued on 27.12.2020.

2.7 The applicant further states that, the Applicant had received two Resolution Plan namely from Steel Line (India) and M/s Puneet Alag; and the financial offers submitted by Both the Resolution Applicants were further revised and enhanced, and subsequently deliberated by MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 the CoC in the meetings held on 08.02.202, 10.02.2021 and 12.02.2021.

2.8 At the 12th CoC meeting held on 26.02.2021, the Resolution Plans received by the Applicant was to put forth for voting. The Applicant sought vote of the CoC members by electronic voting means, which was kept open for at least 24 hours, in accordance with the Regulation 26 of the CIRP Regulations on 01.03.2021. The said voting window was closed on 30.04.2021 after Multiple extensions.

2.9 Pursuant to this, the Resolution plan submitted by the M/s Steel Line (India) Private Limited was approved unanimously by the CoC as per Voting results of the CoC Members and was declared as Successful Resolution Applicant. The other plan submitted by M/s Puneet Alag was rejected by 100% vote.

2.10 The result of e-voting conducted was as follows:

Sr. Details of Financial Voting Percentage No. Creditors Preference of Vote 1. IDBI Bank Ltd Assent 35.09% 2. PNB Assent 37.16% 3. Edelweiss ARC Ltd Assent 27.73% 4. Jeenal R Shah Assent 0.02

3. The salient features of the approved Resolution Plan of Successful Resolution Applicant are as follows: i. The summary of payments proposed to be made under the plan are as follows :

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 Sr. Description Amount No. 1. At actuals CIRP Cost 8,67,28,414 2. (less CIRP Secured Financial Creditors cost) 3. Unsecured Financial Creditors 5,00,000 4. Operational Creditors including Statutory 18,71,586 Liabilities (Income Tax + Service Tax & Others) and other Creditors 5. Workmen & Employees dues including 0.00 gratuity 6. Any other Liability, incl – contingent liabilities 0.00 TOTAL OUTLAY UNDER THE 8,91,00,000 RESOLUTION PLAN Clause 4.5: Summary Proposal of Resolution Applicant Sr. Particulars Amount No. 1. At actuals – within 15 days from the Effective date Payment towards CIRP Cost 2. Upfront payment to Operational Creditors INR 18,71,586 (Within 15 days Settlement amount including statutory and from the effective Date) other creditors i. INR 6,34,867/- towards Earth Castle Premises Cooperative Society Ltd. ii. INR 12,36,719/- towards The Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking.

3. Upfront cash recovery to Secured Financial INR 2,50,00,000/- less CIRP Creditors Cost at actuals. 4. Proposed Deferred P ayment for Secured Financial Creditors Financial Creditors. i. INR 68,64,427/- less CIRP Cost at actuals (within 15 days from the Effective date). ii. INR 1,81,35,573/- (within 30 days from the Effective date).

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 iii. INR 1,37,00,000/- (within 45 days from the Effective date). iv. INR 1,37,00,000/- (within 60 days from the Effective date). v. INR 1,37,00,000/- (within 75 days from the Effective date). vi. INR 2,06,28,414/- (within 90 days from the Effective date). 5. Upfront cash recovery t o Unsecured Financial Unsecured Financial Creditors Creditors (Ms. Jeenal R Shah) i. INR 5,00,000/- (within 15 days from the Effective date) 6. Payment towards Adm itted claim of State Tax Nil Department 7. Payment towards outs tanding employee and NA workmen dues including Gratuity 8. Equity upside to Finan cial Creditors NA 9. Provident Fund for Wo rkmen & Employees NA

Clause 4.6 Details of Settlement Plan to various Creditors

Sr. Parameters Amount Payable Sources of Description of No. Funds Proposal 1. Upfront Cash INR 2,50,00,000/- Please refer Please refer Recovery for Secured less CIRP Cost at Clause 7 Clause 5.3.4 (a) Financial Creditors. actuals 2. Upfront Cash INR 5,00,000/- Please refer Please refer Recovery for Clause 7 Clause 5.3.4 (b) Unsecured Financial Creditors (Ms. Jeenal Shah) 3. NPV of Payment to INR 8,64,36,901/- NA NA Financial Creditors 4. Equity allotment to NA NA NA Financial Creditors 5. Treatment of Other St akeholders (other than Financial Creditors) Operational Creditors INR 18,71,586/- Please refer Please refer 4a including Statutory Clause 7 Clause 5.3.3 Liabilities 4b Employees and NA NA Please refer Workmen dues Clause 5.3.5 including gratuity & EPF.

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 4c Any other liabilities NA NA Please refer and Contingent Clause 5.3.6 Liabilities

Clause 4.7 Details of Fresh Capital Infusion

Sr. Parameters Amounts Payable Sources of Funds No 1. Fresh Capital Infusion Equity Contribution of In the form of the INR 1,00,00,000/- shall equity/other sources be brought up-front. from promoters/ investor/ shareholders/ contribution/ Subordinate Debt Unsecured Loan/ Quasi Equity of INR 7,91,00,000/- Crores out of which INR 1,73,71,586/- shall be brought up-front (the same shall be subordinated to bank debt)

*This timeline is indicative, and the duration may be less or more. In case the aforementioned timelines are not met then the CoC and the Resolution Applicant will mutually decide the extended timeline for payment in terms of the Schedule 4. This may also be subject to Business Day conventions. 4. The Applicant states and submits that i. the Resolution Plan is in due compliance with the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code read with Regulation 38 of the CIRP Regulations and the Resolution Applicant is eligible to submit resolution plan and it does not fall under any of the category as mentioned in Section 29A of the Code;

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 ii. the Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC by 100% vote in their commercial wisdom as they have found the plan to be viable and feasible;

iii. he has filed IA no.1148/2021 in relation to Avoidance Transaction u/s 44 & 66 of the Code, which is pending before Adjudicating Authority; and iv. The Resolution Plan is not subject to any contingency and is filed 25 days before the expiry of the period of CIRP provided in section 12 of the Code.

5. The details of Creditor’s claims admitted by the Resolution Professional claims and the amount provided against such claims in the plan are as follows:

Sr. Nature of Amount Amount Amount Amount No. Creditors Claimed Admitted provided provided to the (In Lakhs) (In Lakhs) in the Plan amount claimed (In Lakhs) (In Lakhs) 1 Secured 53,48,42,502 53,48,42,502 53,48,42,502 53,48,42,502 Financial Creditor (who voted in favor of the Resolution Plan) 2 Unsecured - - - - Financial Creditor 3 Operational 1,07,156 1,07,156 1,07,156 1,07,156 Creditors 4 Other Creditors - - - 5 Workmen and - - - Employees 6 Statutory Dues - - - 7 Other Debts - - -and Dues Grand Total 53,48,42,502 53,48,42,502 53,48,42,502 53,48,42,502

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019

6. The Applicant has filed application along with Form ‘H’ prescribed under Regulation 39(4) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 and has appended a tabular summary of Applicant's determination of compliance of the Resolution Plan with various provisions and regulations under the Code and CIRP Regulations and has declared that- a. The Resolution Applicant meets the criteria approved by the CoC having regard to the complexity and scale of Operations; b. The Resolution Applicant is eligible to submit resolution plan as per the final list of Resolution Professional; c. The Resolution Applicant has submitted an Affidavit stating that it is eligible; d. The Resolution Plan- i. provides for the payment of insolvency resolution process costs; ii. provides for the payment to the operational creditors; iii. provides for the payment to the financial creditors who did not vote in favour of the resolution plan. iv. provides for the management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor. v. provides for the implementation and supervision of the resolution plan. vi. Contravenes any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force.

e. The Resolution Plan- i. is feasible and viable according to the CoC, and ii. has been approved by the CoC with 66% voting share; f. The Resolution plan has provisions for its effective implementation plan, according to the CoC;

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 g. The amount due to the operational creditors under the resolution plan has been given priority over financial creditors; h. The Resolution Plan includes a statement as to how it has dealt with the interests of all stakeholders; i. The Resolution Applicant or any of its related parties has failed to implement or contributed to the failure of implementation of any resolution plan approved under the Code; j. The Resolution Applicant has submitted the statement giving details of such non-implementation; k. The Resolution Plan provides- i. the term of the plan and its implementation schedule; ii. the management and control of the business of the Corporate Debtor during its term; iii. Adequate means for supervising its implementation. l. The Resolution Plan demonstrates that- i. it addresses the cause of default; ii. it is feasible and viable; iii. it has provisions for its effective implementation; iv. it has provisions for approvals required and the timeline for the same; v. the resolution applicant has the capability to implement the resolution plan. m. The RP has not filed applications in respect of transactions observed, found or determined by him; n. The RP has provided details of performance security received as referred to in sub-regulation (4A) of regulation 36B.

7. We have heard the counsel(s) and perused the material on record.

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 8. During the course of hearing in the present application, we asked the Ld. Counsel to clarify whether VAT/Sales Tax dues have been treated in accordance with the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Rainbow Papers Limited; and why payment towards statutory dues and unsecured financial debt of IDBI is NIL. The Ld. Counsel filed a affidavit dated 29.01.2023 clarifying that the statutory dues pertain to demands raised by Maharashtra VAT authorities; the decision in case of Rainbow Papers Limited is distinguishable as Maharashtra VAT Act does not contemplate lien as is case under Gujarat VAT Act; and the liquidation value for these statutory dues is NIL. It was further submitted that the interest of IDBI has already been taken care under allocation of amounts payable to secured financial creditors and IDBI has voted in favour of the plan. As regards discrimination within class of Operational Debts i.e. Electricity dues claim vis a vis Statutory due claim, it was submitted that different sub-class under a class, which are separately and distinctly identifiable, cannot be said to result into discrimination. However, vide Additional Affidavit dated 10.03.2023, the applicant stated that the Successful Resolution Applicant has agreed for treating the two Operational Creditors namely Best undertaking and Earth castle Premises Cooperative Societies limited at par and proportional distribution of the amount allocated to the Operational Creditors between the two, without any change in the allocation of the amount for the Financial Creditors and COC has also approved the same with 99.98% vote. 9. This Application was reserved for orders on 13.03.2023. On perusal of the material before us, we noticed that the order dated 1.3.2021 allowing exclusion of period of 158 days on account of COVID is not on record and the file also does not contain any order fixing the hearing in any Application

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 on 1.3.2021. Accordingly, we listed this application for clarification and was told that the applicant had also not received copy of any such order, however, the said exclusion was ordered in open court. To support his contention, the applicant produced before us cause list of 1.3.2021 on 31.3.2023, where we noticed that an application no. 333/2021 was listed for hearing under CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/C-IV/2019, and said application pertain to such exclusion and is lying undisposed. In view of this, we de-reserved this matter to consider and dispose off IA No.333/2021 before proceeding to consider present application. The IA No. 333/2021 was listed on 10.04.2023 alongwith present application; Ld. Counsel was heard on that date; and both IAs were reserved for order. After considering the prayer and the fact that the Resolution Plan has already been approved by 100% vote and the is lying before us for final approval of Adjudicating Authority, we allow IA No. 333/2021 and order exclusion of 158 days(starting from the date of order passed by the Adjudicating Authority 27.05.2020 till 31.10.2020).

10. We note that no application has been filed by any person opposing the plan and IA no 1148/2021 relating to avoidance transactions is pending before us. The Resolution professional has submitted that all claims received by him have been considered and no claim has been received from any workmen or employees relating to Provident Fund, ESI or Gratuity. Accordingly, we feel that the Resolution plan meets the requirement of section 30(2) of the Code and deserve to be approved. ORDER 11. The Interlocutory Application No. 1576 of 2021 is allowed. The Resolution Plan submitted by the Steel Line (India) is hereby approved. It shall become

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 effective from this date and shall form part of this order. It shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force is due, guarantors and other stakeholders involved in the Resolution Plan.

12. The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) shall accordingly be amended and filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), concerned for information and record. The Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan, shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being in force, within such period as may be prescribed.

13. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Code shall cease to have effect from this date.

14. The Applicant and the Monitoring Committee shall supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan and the Applicant shall file status of its implementation before this Authority from time to time, preferably every quarter.

15. The pending IA no. 1148/2021 pertaining to Avoidance Transaction u/s 43 & 66 of the Code shall be pursued by the Committee of Creditors in the manner decided by them and the proceeds of recovery from such transactions if any shall be distributed among the Financial Creditors up to the settlement of their admitted claims. If any sum is left after such satisfaction, the same

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 shall be distributed amongst other creditors in accordance with 53 of the code.

16. In terms of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, “on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in, respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.”

“95. (i) Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of the resolution plan shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan; (ii) 2019 Amendment to Section 31 of the I&B Code is clarificatory and declaratory in nature and therefore will be effective from the date on which the Code has come into effect; (iii) consequently, all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings

MUMBAI BENCH, C-IV IA No. 1576 of 2021 AND IA No. 333 of 2021 IN CP No. (IB) 2176/(MB)/ C-IV/ 2019 in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 could be continued.” 17. In the view of the above judgement the applicant is entitled to waivers/ concessions/ reliefs as expressly provided under the Code and under any other law for the time being in force. Further, any application for renewal or extension or restoration of any license or approval or connection from any authority shall be subject to payment of prescribed fee and/ or deposit(s) and adherence to the procedure stipulated by such authority, however such authority shall not refuse /deny/approval/extension/restoration merely on ground of previous defaults/non-compliance of the Corporate Debtor.

18. The Applicant shall forward all records relating to the conduct of the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the IBBI along with copy of this Order for information.

19. The Applicant shall forthwith send a copy of this Order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant for necessary compliance.

20. The Interlocutory Application No. 1576/2021 and IA 333/2021 in CP No. 2176/2019 is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- PRABHAT KUMAR KISHORE VEMULAPALLI MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) 19.04.2023.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free